본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국환경범죄의 형사법적 대처

Criminal Law against Environmental Crime in China

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In order to control environmental crimes followed by industrialization and urbanization international community has started to share an idea: use of criminal law for environment protection. In comparison with 1979 Chinese present criminal law extensively regulates environmental crimes in order to handle environmental problems, which become more serious, and demands for protection of environment. There is, however, a big cognitive gap between economic development and environment protection. There also lacks judicial precedents related to environmental criminal law. In this perspective, it is difficult for criminal law itself to solve environmental issues. In conclusion, crimes against environment should be considered as endangering offenses (Gefahrdungsdelikt) with establishing a professional judicial agency against environmental crime. It is also needed to adopt “presumption” and “burden of proof” in the course of criminal suit to handle the complexity and casual relationship of environmental crimes.

Abstract

In order to control environmental crimes followed by industrialization and urbanization international community has started to share an idea: use of criminal law for environment protection. In comparison with 1979 Chinese present criminal law extensively regulates environmental crimes in order to handle environmental problems, which become more serious, and demands for protection of environment. There is, however, a big cognitive gap between economic development and environment protection. There also lacks judicial precedents related to environmental criminal law. In this perspective, it is difficult for criminal law itself to solve environmental issues. In conclusion, crimes against environment should be considered as endangering offenses (Gefahrdungsdelikt) with establishing a professional judicial agency against environmental crime. It is also needed to adopt “presumption” and “burden of proof” in the course of criminal suit to handle the complexity and casual relationship of environmental crimes.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 고명훤, "개혁개방이래 우리나라 환경형사입법의 회고 및 전망", 조화로운 사회의 언어환경하에 환경형법, 연구토론회의논문집
  2. 곽건안, "우리나라 환경형법입법을 개혁하고 완선하는 견의에 대하여", 중국검찰출판사
  3. 산구후, "위험법총론" (2006), 길림대학교 출판사
  4. 서평, "환경형법연구" (2007), 중국법제출판사
  5. 소동매, "환경형법행정적 부차적인 사법해결"
  6. 유원, "범죄와 행정위법행위의 한계 및 처벌제도의 조화" (2008), 배경대학교 출판사
  7. 유지홍, "환경형법의 전체적인 사고방식 및 제도의 설계", 조화로운 사회의 언어환경하에 환경형법, 연구토론회의논문집
  8. 채암홍, "수천 해양위법사건에 모두 형사 처벌을 받지 않았다", 법제일보, ~ (2007)
  9. 초염봉, "형법생태법익론", 중국정법대학교 출판사
  10. 한덕배, "환경보호법교본" (2003), 법률출판사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)