한·중 합성명사의 의미관계에 대한 비교
Comparative study on semantic relationship of Korea-China Compound nouns
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The emphasis of this study is related to Korean language learning among Chinese students in particular with reference to the creation of compound nouns, because China has been classified as a noun in the vocabulary of the components of synthesis based on semantic relationships. Korean Language Learning is for Chinese students and the educational methodology that is applied. Chapter 1 contains the objectives and needs of research, study and research methods, and by reviewing previous studies of Korean and Chinese compound nouns, compound nouns analysis between the components of the semantic relationship. Chapters 2 and 3 refer to compound nouns and the Chinese concept based on the types of compound nouns in Korean and Chinese, who form a significant relationship between the components of distinction which are presented by category and the meaning between the two systematic comparisons of compound names. Also included in this part of the final conclusions and recommendations based on the analysis, it is determined that the two languages can be applied to the common sense of the compound nouns related to the attributes explicitly described.
Abstract
The emphasis of this study is related to Korean language learning among Chinese students in particular with reference to the creation of compound nouns, because China has been classified as a noun in the vocabulary of the components of synthesis based on semantic relationships. Korean Language Learning is for Chinese students and the educational methodology that is applied. Chapter 1 contains the objectives and needs of research, study and research methods, and by reviewing previous studies of Korean and Chinese compound nouns, compound nouns analysis between the components of the semantic relationship. Chapters 2 and 3 refer to compound nouns and the Chinese concept based on the types of compound nouns in Korean and Chinese, who form a significant relationship between the components of distinction which are presented by category and the meaning between the two systematic comparisons of compound names. Also included in this part of the final conclusions and recommendations based on the analysis, it is determined that the two languages can be applied to the common sense of the compound nouns related to the attributes explicitly described.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김규선, "국어의 복합어에 대한 연구", 어문학 (1970)
- 김기혁, "언어유형론" (2010), 소통 출판사
- 김인균, "합성명사의 의미 관계와 사이시옷에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 11, pp.119~138 (2002), 한국어의미학회
- 김정은, "국어단어형성법연구" (1995), 박이정 도서출판
- 김효정, "합성명사의 유형과 의미구조", 석사, 불어불문학, pp.1999
- 손금추, "중국어권 학습자를 위한 한국어 합성명사 교육", 고황논집, 40 (2007)
- 서정수, "합성어에 관한 문제", 한글, 173, 174 (1981)
- 서정수, "국어 문법의 연구" (1990), 한국문화사
- 李顯美, "국어 합성명사에 관한 연구 : 의미 유형을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1995
- 남성옥, "영한 합성어 대비연구, In 중국 조선 어문" (2006), 中國朝鮮語文雜志社
- 정동환, "국어 복합어의 의미 연구" (1993), 서광학술자료사
- 한용수, "중국어학개론" (2004), 선학사
- 陈阿宝, "현대중국어개론" (2005), 다락원
- 許維翰, "現代韓國語語法" (2003), 北京大學出版社
- 武占坤, "現代漢語詞匯槪要" (1981), 內蒙古人民出版社
- 赵元任, "現代漢語語法" (1972), 商務印書館
- 朱德熙, "語法講義" (1983), 商務印書館
- Henzen, "Deutsche Wortbildung" (1965), Niemeyerr