다의미 형용사의 상태성(stativity)에 대하여 －세종계획 전자사전 형용사 기술에 대한 통계적 분석을 중심으로－
The stativity of multi-sense adjectives －based on the statistical analysisof the adjectives in sejong electronic dictionary－
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to examine the stativity of multi-sense adjectives based on the adjectives in sejong electronic dictionary. This study analyzes the differences of stativity between core meaning and transferred meaning of the multi-sense adjectives by the standards which show the aspectual characteristics among the classification criterion of verbs and adjectives. In the analysis result, the stativity of transferred meaning of the multi-sense adjectives is different from the stativity of core meaning of the multi-sense adjectives, so the multi-sense adjectives dominantly show the differences of stativity in the transferred meaning. Therefore we can’t raise objection to the word class, adjectives due to the aspectual difference, so called, the differences of stativity.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the stativity of multi-sense adjectives based on the adjectives in sejong electronic dictionary. This study analyzes the differences of stativity between core meaning and transferred meaning of the multi-sense adjectives by the standards which show the aspectual characteristics among the classification criterion of verbs and adjectives. In the analysis result, the stativity of transferred meaning of the multi-sense adjectives is different from the stativity of core meaning of the multi-sense adjectives, so the multi-sense adjectives dominantly show the differences of stativity in the transferred meaning. Therefore we can’t raise objection to the word class, adjectives due to the aspectual difference, so called, the differences of stativity.
참고문헌 (17)
- 권재일, "한국어 통사론" (1992), 민음사
- 김건희, "한국어 형용사의 논항 구조 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 김건희, "한국어 형용사와 비대격", 인문논총, (60), pp.207~235 (2008), 인문학연구원
- 김선영, "내부 감각 용언에 대한 연구", 진단학보, (109), pp.319~344 (2010), 진단학회
- 김현권, "설명결합사전(DEC)과 ‘시작하다’의 의미 기술", 한글, (286), pp.141~188 (2009), 한글학회
- 남기심, "어휘 의미와 문법", 동방학지, 88, pp.157~179 (1995), 연세대학교 국학연구원
- 도원영, "형용사 구문의 ‘NP가’ 논항에 나타나는 의미역 체계", 畿甸語文學, 12(13), pp.215~244 (2000)
- 도원영, "국어 형용사의 상태성에 대한 고찰", 어문논집, 45, pp.4~108 (2002), 민족어문학회
- 박철우, "형용사 논항 의미부류 표준화를 위한 기초 연구 - '크다, 작다, 많다, 적다'를 중심으로 -", 언어학, (38), pp.123~153 (2004), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 유현경, "한국어 형용사 연구" (1998), 한국문화사
- 전지은, "한국어 형용사 유형 분류와 격틀집합: 세종전자사전을 활용하여", 한국어 의미학, 25, pp.223~251 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- 황병순, "상 의미로 본 국어 동사의 갈래", 한글, 250, pp.227~265 (2000)
- Dixon,R.M.W, "Adjective classes in typological perspective in Adjective Classes: A Cross-Linguistic Typology (Explorations in Linguistic Typology)", pp.1~49 (2004)
- Dowty,David, "Thematic proto-roles and argument selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
- Smith,C, "Activities: States or Events?", Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, pp.478~509 (1999)
- Sohn,H, "The adjective classes in Korean in Adjective Classes A Cross-Linguistic Typology (Explorations in Linguistic Typology)", pp.223~241 (2004)
- Vendler,Z, "Verbs and Times", The Philosophical Review, 66, pp.143~160 (1967)