본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사과표현에서의 남녀 차이

A Study on the Differences in Men’s and Women’s Expressions of Apology

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze differences in expressions of apology between men and wemen. The main data is conclusions of survey for five situations of apology. The subject of investigation that was enforced two times is 316 persons in all. In chapter two, it were analysed that the use of emotional expressions and names of men and wemen in five apology situations. Wemen use exclamation “어머/어머나” for emotional expression and men use exclamation “이런/어라” more than wemen. Men have tendency to call “야”, wemen use “친구야” much more than men. In chapter three, we have studied about devices of reducing distance through use “죄송해요” and “-을게요” that are informal style and difference of both sexes. Wemen use much informal style “죄송해요” than man about an unrelated person. And wemen use expression “-을게요” more than “-겠습니다” for expression of intention. On the other side men use “-겠습니다” more than “-을게요”. Informal style “해요” decrease distance and increase intimacy between speaker and hearer. In chapter four, we analyzed focus of expressions where are speaker’s position and interlocutor’s place. We came to a conclusion that generally men express their personal opinion strongly by using declarative sentences in situation that are in confronted with problem. On the other hand wemen usally depend upon hearer for help and express their opinion weekly using interrogative sentence. Interrogative sentence is expression of heare’s point. Interrogative sentence that contains “어떡하다/어떻게” express speaker’s confusion. In chapter five, we considered the tendency of keep speaker’s face. Men want to keep their face-want between friends. In order to continue their face men select expressions of speaker’s point and use several strategies to reduce face-threatening when they are late for appointment with friends. It covers expressions using word {늦다}, undergrader “좀/조금”, informal style ending “-다”. Wemen usally stand by interlocutor’s place and express cocern for hearer in situation of apology. It contains expressions to select word {기다리다}, intensifier “많이/오래”, ending “-지”

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze differences in expressions of apology between men and wemen. The main data is conclusions of survey for five situations of apology. The subject of investigation that was enforced two times is 316 persons in all. In chapter two, it were analysed that the use of emotional expressions and names of men and wemen in five apology situations. Wemen use exclamation “어머/어머나” for emotional expression and men use exclamation “이런/어라” more than wemen. Men have tendency to call “야”, wemen use “친구야” much more than men. In chapter three, we have studied about devices of reducing distance through use “죄송해요” and “-을게요” that are informal style and difference of both sexes. Wemen use much informal style “죄송해요” than man about an unrelated person. And wemen use expression “-을게요” more than “-겠습니다” for expression of intention. On the other side men use “-겠습니다” more than “-을게요”. Informal style “해요” decrease distance and increase intimacy between speaker and hearer. In chapter four, we analyzed focus of expressions where are speaker’s position and interlocutor’s place. We came to a conclusion that generally men express their personal opinion strongly by using declarative sentences in situation that are in confronted with problem. On the other hand wemen usally depend upon hearer for help and express their opinion weekly using interrogative sentence. Interrogative sentence is expression of heare’s point. Interrogative sentence that contains “어떡하다/어떻게” express speaker’s confusion. In chapter five, we considered the tendency of keep speaker’s face. Men want to keep their face-want between friends. In order to continue their face men select expressions of speaker’s point and use several strategies to reduce face-threatening when they are late for appointment with friends. It covers expressions using word {늦다}, undergrader “좀/조금”, informal style ending “-다”. Wemen usally stand by interlocutor’s place and express cocern for hearer in situation of apology. It contains expressions to select word {기다리다}, intensifier “많이/오래”, ending “-지”

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 구현정, "대화의 기법" (1997), 한국문화사
  2. 권순구, "언어 표현과 인식에 있어서의 남녀 차이 -보조용언의 사용을 중심으로", 인문학연구, 34(3), pp.7~30 (2007), 인문과학연구소
  3. 김경석, "요청, 거부, 사과 발화 행위의 전략", 사회언어학, 4(2), pp.143~169 (1996), 사회언어학회
  4. 김경석, "모국어 화자와 학습자의 발화행위 전략 비교:요청, 거절, 사과 발화행위를 중심으로", 응용언어학, 15(1), pp.79~105 (1999), 한국응용언어학회
  5. 김귀순, "사과표현의 화용론적 이해-젠더와 문화차이를 중심으로", 외대논총, 35, pp.49~63 (2009)
  6. 김선희, "우리 사회 속의 우리말" (2001), 한국문화사
  7. 김인규, "대학사회에서의 한국어 사과 화행 연구", 한국언어문화학, 5(1), pp.195~234 (2008), 국제한국언어문화학회
  8. 김정호, "국어 높임법에 대한 체계적인 사회언어학적 접근", 겨레어문학, 33, pp.31~53 (2004), 겨레어문학회
  9. 김정호, "국어 청자 높임의 변화에 관한사회언어학적 연구", 한말연구, (16), pp.43~74 (2005), 한말연구학회
  10. 김진무, "사과화행의 화용론적 분석", 프랑스문화예술연구, 37, pp.59~94 (2011)
  11. 김혜영, "사적대화에서 성별에 다른 의문형 발화 분석", 화법연구, (18), pp.189~214 (2011), 한국화법학회
  12. Jennifer Coats, "‘성’과 언어" (1998), 청주대학교 출판부
  13. 문금현, "한국어의 고정적인 화용 표현 연구", 국어국문학, (152), pp.181~217 (2009), 국어국문학회
  14. 박영순, "한국어의 사회언어학" (2001), 한국문화사
  15. 서정수, "국어문법론" (1987), 프린트물
  16. 서정수, "현대 국어문법론" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
  17. 손세모돌, "“좀”의 상황적 의미", 한국학논집, 14, pp.477~508 (1998), 한양대학교한국학연구소
  18. 손세모돌, "한국어와 중국어의 사과표현 대조 연구", 국제어문, (55), pp.183~249 (2012), 국제어문학회
  19. 유정정, "대학가 여학생들이 사용하는 호칭어에 관한 고찰", 언어사실과 관점, 37, pp.267~285 (2010), 연세대학교 언어정보연구원
  20. 이우석, "문말표현에서의 여성어에 대한 고찰-한․일어의 남성어와의 대조에서", 일어일문학연구, 27, pp.81~118 (1995), 한국일어일문학회
  21. 이정복, "한국어 경어법, 힘과 거리의 미학" (2008), 소통
  22. 이주행, "한국어 사회방언과 지역방언의 이해" (2005), 한국문화사
  23. 전은주, "인간 관계와 의사소통" (2005), 한국문화사
  24. 전정미, "사과행위의 표현 양상", 담화와 인지, 13(3), pp.167~188 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
  25. 홍민표, "감사와 사죄표현의 한일대조", 일본학연보, 7, pp.65~86 (1998), 일본연구학회
  26. Peter Trudgill, "사회언어학 입문" (1998), 문창사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)