15세기 ㅅ계 합용병서의 음가에 대한 재검토
The phonetic value of ㅅ-clusters in 15th century
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the early stages of the creation of Hunminjeongeum, the ㅅ-clusters within morphemes can be considered as consonant clusters. However, in the late 15th century, examples of ㅅ appearing before the ㅅ-clusters ('봇ᄭᅡ',etc) suggest that the preceding ㅅ was redundant, indicating that the ㅅ-clusters in this context was a fortis [s’]. Ultimately, within morphemes, the ㅅ-clusters transitioned from consonant clusters to [s’]. In the 16th century, there is an increase in the usage of ㅅ+ㅅ-clusters which seemed not renovated form, and this increase, may be attributed to non-phonological motivation influencing the pronunciation shift of the ㅅ-clusters. Among the various instances of the s-clusters of anlaut, those changed from the forms pronounced as lenis [s] are considered fortis [s’]. In contrast, those consistently appearing as the ㅅ-clusters since the early stages of Hunminjeongeum creation are considered consonant clusters. Treating the same character in the same period as having two different underlying phonemes is cumbersome. Furthermore, assuming that these characters originally represented fortis, it is implausible that the Hunminjeongeum creator assigned the characters which included ㅅ that had not even been realized. However, if we were to consider the pronunciation of the ㅅ-clusters of anlaut from the beginning as consonant clusters, it is difficult to establish a motivation for the change. Therefore, we suggest that the change of the pronunciation of the ㅅ-clusters of anlaut can also be attributed to the influence of non-phonological motivation.
Abstract
In the early stages of the creation of Hunminjeongeum, the ㅅ-clusters within morphemes can be considered as consonant clusters. However, in the late 15th century, examples of ㅅ appearing before the ㅅ-clusters ('봇ᄭᅡ',etc) suggest that the preceding ㅅ was redundant, indicating that the ㅅ-clusters in this context was a fortis [s’]. Ultimately, within morphemes, the ㅅ-clusters transitioned from consonant clusters to [s’]. In the 16th century, there is an increase in the usage of ㅅ+ㅅ-clusters which seemed not renovated form, and this increase, may be attributed to non-phonological motivation influencing the pronunciation shift of the ㅅ-clusters. Among the various instances of the s-clusters of anlaut, those changed from the forms pronounced as lenis [s] are considered fortis [s’]. In contrast, those consistently appearing as the ㅅ-clusters since the early stages of Hunminjeongeum creation are considered consonant clusters. Treating the same character in the same period as having two different underlying phonemes is cumbersome. Furthermore, assuming that these characters originally represented fortis, it is implausible that the Hunminjeongeum creator assigned the characters which included ㅅ that had not even been realized. However, if we were to consider the pronunciation of the ㅅ-clusters of anlaut from the beginning as consonant clusters, it is difficult to establish a motivation for the change. Therefore, we suggest that the change of the pronunciation of the ㅅ-clusters of anlaut can also be attributed to the influence of non-phonological motivation.
참고문헌 (24)
- 고광모, "된소리의 발달", 언어학, (95), pp.3~30 (2023), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 권재선, "합용병서의 음가고", 영남어문학, 95, pp.43~68 (1977), 영남어문학회
- 김경아, "중세국어 종성표기 ‘ㅅ’에 대하여", 관악어문연구, 17, pp.113~139 (1992), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 김민수, "합용병서 음가론", 국어국문학, 13, pp.10~44 (1955), 국어국문학회
- 김창섭, "국어의 단어형성과 단어구조 연구" (1996), 태학사
- 김현, "활용형의 재분석에 의한 용언 엉간 재구조화", 국어학, 37, pp.85~113 (2001), 국어학회
- 김현, "장애음 뒤 경음화에 대한 통시론적 고찰", 국어교육, (141), pp.1~29 (2013), 한국어교육학회
- 도수희, "한글학회 50돌 기념논문집", pp.69~104 (1971), 한글학회
- 문병열, "十五世紀國語‘ㅅ’系合用竝書의 音價에 대한 再論", 관악어문연구, 30, pp.27~47 (2005), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 박병채, "고대국어의 연구 음운편" (1977), 고려대학교 출판부
- 박창원, "중세국어 자음연구" (1996), 한국출판사
- 신명균, "박승빈씨의 소위 경음이란 역사상 성음상 아무 근거가 없다", 한글, 8, pp.301~308 (1933)
- 이기문, "어두 자음군의 생성 및 발달에 대하여", 진단학보, 17, pp.187~258 (1955), 진단학회
- 이기문, "국어음운사 연구" (1972), 태학사
- 이남덕, "이숭녕박사송수기념논총", pp.403~417 (1968), 을유문화사
- 정승철, "국어사연구", pp.424~455 (1997), 태학사
- 정승철, "語頭子音群의 硬音化와 激音化", 한국문화, (32), pp.31~48 (2003), 규장각한국학연구원
- 최현배, "한글갈" (1942), 정음사
- 허웅, "국어음운학" (1985), 샘문화사
- Blevins, J., "Evolutionay Phonology" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Bloomfield, "Language" (1933), The University of Chicago Press
- Bybee, J., "Phonology and Language Use" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Detges, U., "Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: a Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar", Zeitschift für Sprachwissenschaft, 21(2), pp.151~195 (2001), Walter De Gruyter
- Hopper, P. J., "Grammaticalization" (1993), Cambridge University Press
