15세기 관형형어미 ㄹ 결합형의 출현 배경에 대한 검토
Background of appearance of the combination Korean adnominal ending -l and its following constituent in the 15th century
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
During the creation of Hunminjeongeum in 15th-century Korea, two writing forms emerged that combined the adnominal ending -l with its following constituent, necessitating an investigation into their relationship. When a constituent with strong combination constraints is followed by the former adnominal ending -ls, the initial sound of the following constituent of ㄽ is reconstructed, resulting in the formation of '-l+S-Habyongbyeongseo(doubled consonant letters starting with s)'. Meanwhile, the -l from -ls and the initial sound of the following constituent are newly analyzed as fortis [s͈]. This is because the morphological awareness of -ls is weakened due to competition with other adnominal endings like -n and -ls. The analysis and subsequent analogy led to a change to fortis [s͈] when the initial sound of the following constituent was a plosive. Korean language users with a transparent inherent grammar of [ʔ] had two options. If the following constituent was used independently, they chose -lʔ for the adnominal ending. However, even though they had a transparent inherent grammar of [ʔ], if the following constituent was restricted by its preceding constituent, users had to choose '-l+Gakjabyeongseo(doubled consonant letters)' forms. Consequently, there was no phonological relationship between these two forms of adnominal endings and their following constituent combinations.
Abstract
During the creation of Hunminjeongeum in 15th-century Korea, two writing forms emerged that combined the adnominal ending -l with its following constituent, necessitating an investigation into their relationship. When a constituent with strong combination constraints is followed by the former adnominal ending -ls, the initial sound of the following constituent of ㄽ is reconstructed, resulting in the formation of '-l+S-Habyongbyeongseo(doubled consonant letters starting with s)'. Meanwhile, the -l from -ls and the initial sound of the following constituent are newly analyzed as fortis [s͈]. This is because the morphological awareness of -ls is weakened due to competition with other adnominal endings like -n and -ls. The analysis and subsequent analogy led to a change to fortis [s͈] when the initial sound of the following constituent was a plosive. Korean language users with a transparent inherent grammar of [ʔ] had two options. If the following constituent was used independently, they chose -lʔ for the adnominal ending. However, even though they had a transparent inherent grammar of [ʔ], if the following constituent was restricted by its preceding constituent, users had to choose '-l+Gakjabyeongseo(doubled consonant letters)' forms. Consequently, there was no phonological relationship between these two forms of adnominal endings and their following constituent combinations.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김경아, "국어의 음운표시와 음운과정" (2000), 태학사
- 김완진, "鄕歌解讀法硏究" (1980), 서울대학교출판부
- 김유범, "관형사형어미 ‘-ㄹ’ 뒤의 경음화 현상에 대한 통시적 고찰", 한국어학, 10, pp.5~25 (1999), 한국어학회
- 김유범, "『훈민정음』의 각자병서자와 전탁음의 음가에 대한 재론", 우리말연구, 59, pp.5~45 (2019), 우리말학회
- 김정인, "15세기 ㅅ계 합용병서의 음가에 대한 재검토", 한말연구, 64(50), pp.1~22 (2023), 한말연구학회
- 박창원, "중세국어 자음연구" (1996), 한국출판사
- 신승용, "‘-ㅭ+평음’과 ‘-ㄹ+각자병서’, ‘-ㄹ+평음’ 재론", 동아인문학, 12, pp.411~438 (2007), 동아인문학회
- 심소희, "동아시아 지역의 언어관 –정음 사상의 연구", 중국언어연구, 10, pp.1~30 (2000), 학고방
- 이경희, "한국어 평마찰음과 경마찰음의 음향적 특징과 지각 단서", 한국음향학회지, 19, pp.95~100 (2000), 한국음향학회
- 이기문, "國語史槪說" (1998), 태학사
- 이익섭, "國語表記法硏究" (1992), 서울대학교출판부
- 장윤희, "석독구결의 속격 –시(尸)의 문제 해결을 위하여", 구결연구, 27, pp.11~144 (2012), 구결학회
- 차익종, "以影補來표기의 동기와 ㅭ 종성 음절의 음운론적 성격에 대하여", 인문학연구, 61, pp.169~198 (2021), 조선대학교 인문학연구원
- 최준호, "한국어 어미 ‘-을’의 역사적 연구", 석사, pp.2019
- 황선엽, "석독구결 ‘尸’의 해독에 대하여", 한국문학논총, 26, pp.255~280 (2000), 한국문학회
- 허웅, "국어음운학" (1985), 샘문화사
- Bybee, J., "Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically-conditioned sound change", Language Variation and Change, 14, pp.261~290 (2002)
- Hopper, Joan Bybee., "Current progress in historical linguistics", pp.96~105 (1976), North Holland
