臺灣 歷史 敎科書의 韓國 認識 - 開港期 부분을 중심으로

Abstract

Overall, the history textbooks in Korea, China, and Taiwan have tendency to describe their own viewpoints rather than by each mutual relationship. In case of Twain, the textbook is involved in the Sinicism and is depicted in the central of influence to Joseon. Japan also has been rationalized the invasion of Joseon. Korea has an attitude for the theory of successful war. To begin with, China considers the neighborhood countries to the dependency of China. Joseon was the first one of dependencies. The viewpoint of the subordinate relationship has China threatened by many of revels and aggression of vassal under the Western World Powers. Japan expressed by Chinese textbook had a national strength after the MyungChi Reform, and developed the Western civilization which was positive in expansion. China on the sovereign authority of Joseon was threaten in the process of that. In particular, Taiwanese textbook is focusing on the perpetual coalition between Japan and Taiwan. Second, As the process that Japan invaded Joseon was weakened by Kanhwa-do Treaty, the history textbook described, Qing Dynasty strengthened the perpetual domination with the official ties of Joseon and Western Powers. After the Imho Army Rebellion, the political intervention of Qing government was omitted. The Treaty Act that Qing notified the dispatch of troops in Chunjin Treaty played the mischief with a suzerain state Qing. As the result, that made the origin of Sino-Japanese War. At this juncture, the textbook depicted that Japan planned to have the naval supremacy and launching warship to hold the north=-sea fleet. Third, Taiwanese textbook has argued that the causes of Sino-Japanese War was the Donghak Farmers Movement. the viewpoints of the history textbooks in Korea, China, and Japan have difference in the aspect of the term and religious characteristic of it. But the Gyeongbokgung occupation and aggression of Qing troops have common statement. With the defeat of the war after the Makyan Treaty the book mainly deals with the loss of the perpetual authority in Joseon involving the contents of activities of islands in Yodong, Taiwan, Peongho. Viewed from the perspective, the distorted attitude in Taiwanese textbook is rooted from the fact that Taiwanese still considers Joseon Dynast as the one the important subordinate nation of China.