일본인의 조선여행기록에 비친 조선의 표상 -『大役小志』를 중심으로-
The Representation of Korea reflected in the travel reports of the Japanese -on the focus of Daiyakushosi(大役小志)-
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this thesis, I researched the describing method on watching Korea from a standpoint of the travel with the travel reports of Korea, Daiyakushosi. Especially, I would keep my eyes on the following three points. Firstly, after the war of Russia-Japan, what the Japanese travelled over Korea for, through these travels, what Japanese turned their attention on. Secondly, what image of Korea was represented through travels, and how it was spread and accepted abroad. Lastly, by which representing method, Korea was regarded as a represented space of colony. By studying these points, I tried to find out the imperial mind of Japanese which travels involved at that time. With the Japan’s victory in the war of Russia-Japan, the colonization of Korea was accepted as an already-determined fact. At that time, in Japan a lot of researching reports were issued for the purpose of ruling Korea effectively. Daiyakushosi was written as a link of these atmosphere too. The image of Korea represented in the Daiyakushosi is Korea worshipping the powerful countries, Korea suffered for the extortion of heavy taxes and corruption of public officers, and Korea impossible to be independent. In a word, Korea was regarded as a weak woman, Japan as a powerful man. Japanese used this image of Korea as a means or a theory of admiring the victory of Japan in the war of Russia-Japan, and justifying the domination over Korea by Japan. The travel reports of Korea were issued by each local government and economic associations as well as central government like the department of ministry or the department of agriculture and commercial in Japan. All contents of them was to agitate to progress into Korea with unlimited economic value. Mostly, in the researching reports, they emphasized backward and undeveloped state of Korea, and thus Japan was thought to develop Korea directly. Japan established dominating strategy through detailed examination in the colonizing process of Korea. The travel reports of Korea did much for this purpose. The travel reports of Korea, Daiyakushosi was not a book for the intellectual inquiry, but the expression of imperial Japan’s ‘Colonialism’.
Abstract
In this thesis, I researched the describing method on watching Korea from a standpoint of the travel with the travel reports of Korea, Daiyakushosi. Especially, I would keep my eyes on the following three points. Firstly, after the war of Russia-Japan, what the Japanese travelled over Korea for, through these travels, what Japanese turned their attention on. Secondly, what image of Korea was represented through travels, and how it was spread and accepted abroad. Lastly, by which representing method, Korea was regarded as a represented space of colony. By studying these points, I tried to find out the imperial mind of Japanese which travels involved at that time. With the Japan’s victory in the war of Russia-Japan, the colonization of Korea was accepted as an already-determined fact. At that time, in Japan a lot of researching reports were issued for the purpose of ruling Korea effectively. Daiyakushosi was written as a link of these atmosphere too. The image of Korea represented in the Daiyakushosi is Korea worshipping the powerful countries, Korea suffered for the extortion of heavy taxes and corruption of public officers, and Korea impossible to be independent. In a word, Korea was regarded as a weak woman, Japan as a powerful man. Japanese used this image of Korea as a means or a theory of admiring the victory of Japan in the war of Russia-Japan, and justifying the domination over Korea by Japan. The travel reports of Korea were issued by each local government and economic associations as well as central government like the department of ministry or the department of agriculture and commercial in Japan. All contents of them was to agitate to progress into Korea with unlimited economic value. Mostly, in the researching reports, they emphasized backward and undeveloped state of Korea, and thus Japan was thought to develop Korea directly. Japan established dominating strategy through detailed examination in the colonizing process of Korea. The travel reports of Korea did much for this purpose. The travel reports of Korea, Daiyakushosi was not a book for the intellectual inquiry, but the expression of imperial Japan’s ‘Colonialism’.
참고문헌 (49)
- 石森秀三, "觀光の2０世紀" (1996), ドメス出版
- 山路勝彦, "植民地主義と人類學" (2002), 關西學院大學出版會
- 山路勝彦, "近代日本の海外學術調査" (2006), 山川出版社
- 竹越與三郞, "南國記" (1910), 二酉社
- 木村健二, "戰前期朝鮮における日本人商工會議所の刊行圖書", 商經論集, 42 (1982)
- 鶴園裕, "調査の時代ー明治期․日本における朝鮮硏究の一点描", 千葉史學, 7 (1985)
- 角山榮, "日本領事報告の硏究" (1986), 同文館
- 기무라 겐지, "메이지 시대 일본의 조사보고서에 나타난 조선 인식, 근대교류사와 상호인식, 한일공동연구총서" (2002), 아연출판부
- 千田剛道, "植民地朝鮮の博物館-慶州古蹟保存會陳列館を中心に", 朝鮮史硏究會論文集, 35 (1997)
- 윤소영, "일본어잡지『朝鮮及滿洲』에 나타난 1910년대 경성", 지방사와 지방문화, 9(1), pp.163~201 (2006), 역사문화학회
- 윤소영, "러일전쟁 전후 일본인의 조선여행기록물에 보이는 조선인식", 한국민족운동사연구, 51(51), pp.49~94 (2007), 한국민족운동사학회
- 최석영, "식민지시대 고적보존회와 지방의 관광화-부여고적보존회를 중심으로-", 아시아문화연구, 18 (2002)
- 최석영, "일제 식민지 상황에서의 부여(扶餘) 고적에 대한 재해석과 '관광명소'화", 비교문화연구, 9(1), pp.109~137 (2003), 비교문화연구소
- 조성운, "1910년대 식민지 조선의 근대 관광의 탄생", 한국민족운동사연구, (56), pp.103~146 (2008), 한국민족운동사학회
- 조성운, "일제하 조선총독부의 관광정책", 동아시아문화연구, (46), pp.7~45 (2009), 동아시아문화연구소
- 윤소영, "식민통치 표상 공간 경주와 투어리즘 ― 1910~20년대 일본인의 여행기를 중심으로 ―", 동양학, (45), pp.159~184 (2009), 동양학연구소
- 최재철, "일본근대문학자가 본 한국", 일어일문학연구, 13, pp.14~ (1989)
- 최재철, "일본근대문학자가 본 한국", 일본연구, 4 (1989)
- 서기재, "일본근대 「여행안내서」를 통해서 본 조선과 조선관광", 日本語文學, 13(13), pp.423~440 (2002), 한국일본어문학회
- 서기재, "高浜虛子의 『朝鮮』연구--「여행안내서」로서의 의의--", 日本語文學, 16(16) (2003), 한국일본어문학회
- 中根隆行, "朝鮮 表象の文化誌" (2004), 新曜社
- 이양희, "日本植民地下の？光開？に？する？究", 일본어문학, 24(24), pp.465~488 (2004), 일본어문학회
- 우미영, "古都 여행, 과거의 발견과 영토의 소비 - 식민지 시대 경주 기행문을 중심으로 -", 동아시아문화연구, (46), pp.113~140 (2009), 동아시아문화연구소
- 나카네 다카유키, "제국 일본의 ‘만선(滿鮮)’ 관광지와 고도 경주의 표상", 한국문학연구, (36), pp.55~78 (2009), 한국문학연구소
- 이규수, "일본의 국수주의자, 시가 시게타카(志賀重昴)의 한국인식", 민족문화연구, (45), pp.413~450 (2006), 민족문화연구원
- 井上勝生, "札幌農學校と植民學の誕生, 帝國 日本の學知" (2006), 岩波書店
- 土方定一, "志賀重昻 知られざる國々", pp.22~23 (1943), 日本評論社
- 시게타카, "南洋時事(增補訂正4版)", pp.201~ (1891), 丸善商社書店
- 淸水元, "明治中期の 南進論』と 環太平洋 構想の原型-志賀重昻 南洋時事 をめぐって 1-2", アジア經濟, 32(9), pp.10~ (1991)
- 林原純生, "南洋時事』から 日本風景論』へ-初期志賀重昻における<文學>", 日本文學, 44(1) (1995)
- 水野守, "志賀重昴『南洋』巡航と『南洋時事』のあいだ-世紀轉換期日本の『帝國意識", 大阪大學日本學報, 20 (2001)
- 志賀重昻全集刊行會, "志賀重昻全集 第3卷", pp.3~4 (1927), 志賀重昂全集刊行會
- 中野目徹, "政敎社の研究" (1993), 思文閣出版
- 佐藤能丸, "明治ナショナリズムの硏究: 政敎社の成立とその周邊" (1998), 芙蓉書房出版
- 함동주, "근대일본의 서양담론과 정교사(政敎社)", 일본역사연구, 15 (2002)
- 黒岩健, "登山の黎明-「日本風景論」の謎を追って" (1979), ぺりかん社
- 山本教彦, "風景の成立-志賀重昂と, 日本風景論" (1997), 海風社
- 大室幹雄, "志賀重昂, 日本風景論 精読(岩波現代文庫)" (2003), 岩波書店
- 和田八千穗, "朝鮮の回顧", pp.371~374 (1945), 近澤書店
- 梶村秀樹, "朝鮮史と日本人(梶村秀樹著作集1)" (1992), 明石書店
- 高崎宗司, "植民地朝鮮の日本人(岩波新書790)" (2002), 岩波書店
- 이규수, "개항장 인천(1883-1910)-재조일본인과 도시의 식민지화", 인천학연구, 6 (2007)
- "大役小志", 62~
- 이규수, "후지이 간타로(藤井寬太郞)의 한국진출과 농장경영", 대동문화연구, (49), pp.267~310 (2005), 대동문화연구원
- "大役小志", 35~
- 李圭洙, "近代朝鮮における植民地地主制と農民運動" (1996), 信山社
- 李圭洙, "日本人地主の土地集積過程と群山農事組合", 一橋論叢, 116(2) (1996)
- 이규수, "후지이 간타로(藤井寬太郞)의 한국진출과 농장경영", 대동문화연구, (49), pp.267~310 (2005), 대동문화연구원
- 熊平源藏, "朝鮮同胞の光", pp.375~ (1934), 熊平商店