본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대 일본의 수로지에 나타난 울릉도․독도 인식

The Japanese Recognition on Ulleungdo․Dokdo in Modern Pilot

1

조회

0

다운로드

23

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Geographical recognition is very important for Dokdo sovereignty dispute. This is related to the recognition on Ulleungdo․Dokdo which reveals in every geographical records. This paper will review the Japanese Ulleungdo․Dokdo recognition after Meiji(1868) until Japanese coercive merge of Korea in modern geography records. Especially this paper focused on 『pilot』 which was published by Japan Ministry of Marine Department of Marine Sea etc. Because those facts could suggest a logical base if the foundation of Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs for Dokdo sovereignty by ‘historical recognition’ and ‘Terra Nulius’ would establish. We can point out three issues in the analysis for the pilot. First, the Japanese fisherman around Sanin(山陰) shore and Japanese Dajokan(太政官) and Ministry of Foreign Affairs consistently have recognised 「Ulleungdo=Takeshima, Dokdo=Matsushima」 until late of 19C but Japan navy have recognised 「Ulleungdo=Matsushima, Dokdo=Liancourt」 as different island. This kind of false recognition have induced the intentional annexation of Dokdo as Liancourt to Japan. This could be a same context with the past intention of Ulleungdo annexation by Tsushima province and the Takeshima one event. Second, the pilot read Ulleungdo and Dokdo as one set of geographical item in Ulleungdo until 1905 Dokdo annexation by Japan and from 1910 coercive merge of Korean peninsular by Japan to Korean liberation year. This view proves Japan have recognized Dokdo(Matsushima) as one of attached island of Ulleungdo (Takeshima) or neighbor island from Bafuku era. Third, modern Japan navy publish pilot shows obvious differentiation of territory. After 1895, Taiwan was included in Japanese territory in the 『Japan Pilot』 but others were included in 『Choseon Pilot』, which showed obvious view of the pilot recognizing the territorial sea and land in unit. So, the fact Dokdo․Ulleungdo was included in 『Choseon Pilot』 obviously proved the islands were belong to Choseon territory.

Abstract

Geographical recognition is very important for Dokdo sovereignty dispute. This is related to the recognition on Ulleungdo․Dokdo which reveals in every geographical records. This paper will review the Japanese Ulleungdo․Dokdo recognition after Meiji(1868) until Japanese coercive merge of Korea in modern geography records. Especially this paper focused on 『pilot』 which was published by Japan Ministry of Marine Department of Marine Sea etc. Because those facts could suggest a logical base if the foundation of Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs for Dokdo sovereignty by ‘historical recognition’ and ‘Terra Nulius’ would establish. We can point out three issues in the analysis for the pilot. First, the Japanese fisherman around Sanin(山陰) shore and Japanese Dajokan(太政官) and Ministry of Foreign Affairs consistently have recognised 「Ulleungdo=Takeshima, Dokdo=Matsushima」 until late of 19C but Japan navy have recognised 「Ulleungdo=Matsushima, Dokdo=Liancourt」 as different island. This kind of false recognition have induced the intentional annexation of Dokdo as Liancourt to Japan. This could be a same context with the past intention of Ulleungdo annexation by Tsushima province and the Takeshima one event. Second, the pilot read Ulleungdo and Dokdo as one set of geographical item in Ulleungdo until 1905 Dokdo annexation by Japan and from 1910 coercive merge of Korean peninsular by Japan to Korean liberation year. This view proves Japan have recognized Dokdo(Matsushima) as one of attached island of Ulleungdo (Takeshima) or neighbor island from Bafuku era. Third, modern Japan navy publish pilot shows obvious differentiation of territory. After 1895, Taiwan was included in Japanese territory in the 『Japan Pilot』 but others were included in 『Choseon Pilot』, which showed obvious view of the pilot recognizing the territorial sea and land in unit. So, the fact Dokdo․Ulleungdo was included in 『Choseon Pilot』 obviously proved the islands were belong to Choseon territory.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 일본 해군성, "수로잡지", ~
  2. 일본 해군성, "환영수로지", ~
  3. 일본 해군성, "조선수로지", ~
  4. 일본 해군성, "일본수로지", ~
  5. "죽도문제"[URL]
  6. 朴炳涉, "島根県 「竹島固有領土」 論とらず", 半月城通信, (134,) (2008)
  7. 山邊健太郞, "竹島問題の歴史的考察", コリア評論, 7(2), pp.4~14 (1965)
  8. 川上健三, "竹島の歴史地理学的研究" (1966), 古今書院
  9. 이케우치 사토시, "일본 에도시대의 다케시마-마츠시마 인식", 獨島硏究, (6), pp.199~221 (2009), 영남대학교 독도연구소
  10. 朴炳涉, "明治政府の竹島=独島認識", 北東アジア文化研究, (8), pp.33~49 (2008), 鳥取短期大学
  11. 신용하, "독도의 민족영토사 연구" (1996), 지식산업사
  12. 朴炳涉, "明治時代の水路誌と国境策定", ~
  13. 内藤正中, "竹島=独島論争", pp.96~104 (2007), 新刊社
  14. 유미림, "지리지 안의 울릉도․독도 인식의 추이, In 근대 일본의 지리지에 나타난 울릉도․독도 인식", pp.136~161 (2010), 한국수산개발원
  15. 川上健三, "竹島の歴史地理学的研究", pp.11~20 (1966), 古今書院
  16. 海軍水路局, "水路雜誌 第一六號", pp.24~25 (1883)
  17. 야마스미 나오기요, "水路雜誌", pp.1~2
  18. 竹内猛, "竹島=獨島問題 固有の領土論の歴史的検討", pp.71~72 (2010), 報光社
  19. 김수희, "개척령기 울릉도와 독도로 건너간 거문도 사람들", 한일관계사연구, (38), pp.197~229 (2011), 한일관계사학회
  20. 水路部, "朝鮮水路誌 全", pp.255~256 (1894)
  21. 水路部, "日本水路誌 第四巻, 第一改版" (1907)
  22. 水路部, "朝鮮沿岸水路誌 第一巻", pp.86~87 (1933)
  23. 사다 하쿠보, "조선국교제시말내탐서", ~ (1870)
  24. 정영미, "죽도고증(竹島考證) 하", pp.476~ (2006), 바른역사정립기획단
  25. 繪圖․地圖からみる竹島(Ⅱ)」, In 竹島問題に関する調査研究」 最終報告書, "船杉力修", 竹島問題 研究会, 155~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)