HSK코퍼스 중 한국 학생의 把字句 오류분석과 유추
An Analysis and Analogical Inference of the Incorrect Use of 'Ba'(把) Construction by Korean Students in HSK Corpus
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
By reanalyzing the typical errors of the 'ba' Construction of Korean students in HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus, it categorizes two types of error-generating mechanism: 1) Object marker, 2) the Causative structures. These errors were derived from strong interference and negative transfer of mother tongue. This paper also claims that it is possible to use the four types of errors(1. Post-posing of Negative and Auxiliary verbs, 2. Using the indefinite 'ba' Construction, 3. Verb errors, 4. Causative errors) and the analysis of the special 'ba' Construction in this essay to predict the other contemporary Chinese dialects which have closely contacted with the Altaic languages and the historical Altaic Chinese documents. From this analysis, we can find that Korean students have no avoidance about 'ba' Construction, absolutely misusing it in Second Language Acquisition, and this inter-language phenomena no reaching target language were caused by over generalization of 'ba' Construction.
Abstract
By reanalyzing the typical errors of the 'ba' Construction of Korean students in HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus, it categorizes two types of error-generating mechanism: 1) Object marker, 2) the Causative structures. These errors were derived from strong interference and negative transfer of mother tongue. This paper also claims that it is possible to use the four types of errors(1. Post-posing of Negative and Auxiliary verbs, 2. Using the indefinite 'ba' Construction, 3. Verb errors, 4. Causative errors) and the analysis of the special 'ba' Construction in this essay to predict the other contemporary Chinese dialects which have closely contacted with the Altaic languages and the historical Altaic Chinese documents. From this analysis, we can find that Korean students have no avoidance about 'ba' Construction, absolutely misusing it in Second Language Acquisition, and this inter-language phenomena no reaching target language were caused by over generalization of 'ba' Construction.
참고문헌 (21)
- 陈保亚, "语言接觸导致汉语方言分化的两種模式", 北京大学学报, (2) (2005)
- 刁晏斌, "试论近代汉语语法的特點", 辽寧師範大学学报, (1) (1991)
- 蒋绍愚, ""元曲选"中的"把"字句——把字句再论", 语言研究, (1) (1999)
- 金道榮, "論阿爾泰語法背景下的漢語把字句偏誤的生成機制與敎學對策", 박사, 中國語言文學系, pp.2010
- 李大忠, "外国人学汉语语法偏误分析" (1997), 北京语言文化大学出版社
- 力提甫, "阿尔泰语言的句法结構" (2004), 中央民族大学出版社
- 刘颂浩, "论"把"字句运用中的回避现象及"把"字句的难點", 语言教学與研究, (2) (2003)
- 沈家煊, "如何處置"處置式"?----論把字句主觀性", 中国語文, (5) (2002)
- 陶红印, "無定式把字句在近,现代漢語中的地位问题及其理论意义", 中国语文, (5) (2000)
- 吴福祥, "敦煌变文語法研究" (1996), 岳鹿书社
- 徐通鏘, "歷史語言學" (1996), 商務印書館
- 徐阳春, "複杂與特殊“把”字句语义结構及语用功能——≪金瓶梅≫≪红楼夢≫≪兒女英雄传≫“把”字句例析", 绍兴文理学院学报, (3) (2003)
- 张寶林, "回避與泛化——基于"HSK动态作文语料库"的"把"字句习得考察", 世界汉语教学, (2) (2010)
- Croft, William, "Typology and Universals" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Rod Ellis, "The Study of Second Language Acquisition" (1994), Oxford Press
- Christopher Lyons, "Definiteness" (1999), University of Cambridge
- Wen Xiao-hong, "Error and Corrective Feedback", JCLTA, 34(3) (1999)
- 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어문법1" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 趙冬梅, "母語的負遷移導致的韓國學生漢語詞語偏誤分析", 중국어문논총, (31), pp.87~104 (2006), 중국어문연구회
- 崔圭鉢, "＜把字句＞의 起源과 初期構造 試探", 圓大論文集, 24 (1990)
- 최규발, "把字句의 주관성과 주관화", 중국어문학논집, (50), pp.287~307 (2008), 중국어문학연구회