본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

경험상 ‘過’와 ‘-은 적이 있-’, ‘-었었-’ 비교 연구

A Comparative Study on the Experiential Marker ‘guo (過)’ and ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’, ‘ess-ess (었었)’

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

When we translate the Chinese experiential aspect marker ‘guo (過)’, we often translate it as ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’ or ‘ess-ess (었었)’. And in some sentences ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’ is preferred, and in other sentences ‘ess-ess (었었)’ is preferred. We aims to explain this problem by comparing these three markers. ‘Guo (過)’ and ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’ share most features of experiential aspect markers, so we can say that both ‘guo (過)’ and ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’ are experiential markers. However ‘ess-ess (었었)’ originates from the repetition of ‘ess (었)’ which means situation time precedes reference time. Therefore ‘ess-ess (었었)’ originally means the pluperfect tense(past of past), but most sentences with ‘ess-ess (었었)’ are interpreted as past tense. Also because ‘ess-ess’ has two reference times(one is in the past and the other is in speech time), it has the meanings of recollection and discontinuity. And while ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’ represents only somewhat remote past, ‘guo (過)’ and ‘ess-ess (었었)’ can also represent near past. Lastly ‘ess-ess (었었)’ seems to have less to do with the meaning of ‘experiential’ aspect in its basic sense, but sometimes it is interpreted as ‘experiential’ due to the meanings of ‘past tense’ and ‘discontinuity of state’

Abstract

When we translate the Chinese experiential aspect marker ‘guo (過)’, we often translate it as ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’ or ‘ess-ess (었었)’. And in some sentences ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’ is preferred, and in other sentences ‘ess-ess (었었)’ is preferred. We aims to explain this problem by comparing these three markers. ‘Guo (過)’ and ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’ share most features of experiential aspect markers, so we can say that both ‘guo (過)’ and ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’ are experiential markers. However ‘ess-ess (었었)’ originates from the repetition of ‘ess (었)’ which means situation time precedes reference time. Therefore ‘ess-ess (었었)’ originally means the pluperfect tense(past of past), but most sentences with ‘ess-ess (었었)’ are interpreted as past tense. Also because ‘ess-ess’ has two reference times(one is in the past and the other is in speech time), it has the meanings of recollection and discontinuity. And while ‘un cek-i iss (은 적이 있)’ represents only somewhat remote past, ‘guo (過)’ and ‘ess-ess (었었)’ can also represent near past. Lastly ‘ess-ess (었었)’ seems to have less to do with the meaning of ‘experiential’ aspect in its basic sense, but sometimes it is interpreted as ‘experiential’ due to the meanings of ‘past tense’ and ‘discontinuity of state’

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 남기심, "‘-었었-’의 쓰임에 대하여", 한글, 162, pp.97~109 (1978)
  2. 문숙영, "한국어 시제 범주 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2005
  3. 박진호, "‘-었었-’의 단절과거 용법에 대한 재고찰 - 함축의 관습화와 유형론의 관점에서 -", 한글, (311), pp.89~121 (2016), 한글학회
  4. 신언호, "한국어 현재 시제의 다의적 현상에 대한 고찰", 한국어 의미학, 21, pp.165~181 (2006), 한국어의미학회
  5. 최규발, "한중 경험상 대조분석", 중국언어연구, (25), pp.231~260 (2007), 한국중국언어학회
  6. 한동완, "국어의 시제 연구" (1996), 태학사
  7. 劉月華, "實用現代漢語語法" (2001), 商務印書館
  8. 呂叔湘, "現代漢語八百詞" (1999), 商務印書館
  9. Comrie, Bernard, "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
  10. Comrie, Bernard, "Tense" (1985), Cambridge University Press
  11. Inoue, K., "Studies in the Perfect", Ph. D., pp.1975
  12. Kim, Nam-kil, "On Experiential Sentences", Studies in Language, 22, pp.161~204 (1998)
  13. Li, C. N., "표준중국어문법" (1989), 한울 아카데미
  14. Lin, Jo-wang, "Predicate Restriction, Discontinuity Property and the Semantics of the Perfective Marker Guo in Mandarin Chinese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 16, pp.237~257 (2007)
  15. Ma, Jing-heng S., "Some Aspects of the Teaching of ‘-Guo’ and ‘-Le’", JCLTA, 12, pp.14~26 (1977)
  16. Pan, H., "The Role of Pragmatics in Interpreting the Chinese Perfective Markers-Guo and –Le", Journal of Pragmatics, 36, pp.441~466 (2004)
  17. Smith, C. S., "The Parameter of Aspect" (1991), Kluwer
  18. Wu, Jiun-Shiung, "Terminability, Wholeness and the Semantics of the Experiential Guo", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17, pp.1~32 (2008)
  19. Yeh, Meng, "The Experiential GUO in Mandarin: A Quantificational Approach", Ph. D., pp.1993

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)