郭璞의 晉代 漢語 入聲韻 음운체계
Guo Pu’s Rusheng Phonology of the Jin Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is designed to reconstruct phonology of Rusheng[入聲] as reflected in the Guo Pu[郭璞]’s glosses and rimes, which will be employed as main clues to set up his phonological system. Guo Pu(AD 276—324) has left a massive number of sound glosses to some exegetic and literary works, and a handful of rimes in his extant verses. His glosses include the fanqie spellings[反切法] and the direct phonetic notaions[直音法] which, along with his rimes, are claimed to signal a certain phonology of Jin Dynasty[晉代], halfway between Old Chinese[OC] and Middle Chinese[MC]. For our discussion, we take up Zheng-Zhang’s OC and MC systems as reference with minor modification to his MC medials. The conclusions are stated as follows: MC 1st div. Wu Rime[屋₁韻] stays as it was in OC, while the other rimes from OC Wu Group[屋部] and Jiao Group[覺部] are on the way toward MC. The formation of Duo Rime[鐸韻] and Yao Rime[藥韻], both of which will belong to Dang Rime Group[宕攝] in Late Middle Chinese, has been completed. Mo Rime[陌韻] of Geng Rime Group[梗攝] does not appear to have progressed much out of OC as of the Guo’s period. MC Xi Rime[昔韻] has two different OC Duo Group[鐸部] origins, one of which had a long vowel *–aa-, the other of which had a short *–a-. In Guo’s phonology, the former is postulated to retain –aa-, while the latter is assumed to be in the transitional phase making its way toward –e- which is believed to be occasioned by the 3rd div. medial. Mai Rime[麥韻] and Xi Rime[錫韻] have retained their vowel as –e- without changing its sound value throughout the periods from OC to MC. It is entirely possible that MC Zhen Rime Group[臻攝] and Shan Rime Group[山攝] have been formed. Xian Rime Group[咸攝] does not seem to have been fully formed, while the formation of Qin Rime Group[侵攝] may have been almost completed in the Guo’s system.
Abstract
This study is designed to reconstruct phonology of Rusheng[入聲] as reflected in the Guo Pu[郭璞]’s glosses and rimes, which will be employed as main clues to set up his phonological system. Guo Pu(AD 276—324) has left a massive number of sound glosses to some exegetic and literary works, and a handful of rimes in his extant verses. His glosses include the fanqie spellings[反切法] and the direct phonetic notaions[直音法] which, along with his rimes, are claimed to signal a certain phonology of Jin Dynasty[晉代], halfway between Old Chinese[OC] and Middle Chinese[MC]. For our discussion, we take up Zheng-Zhang’s OC and MC systems as reference with minor modification to his MC medials. The conclusions are stated as follows: MC 1st div. Wu Rime[屋₁韻] stays as it was in OC, while the other rimes from OC Wu Group[屋部] and Jiao Group[覺部] are on the way toward MC. The formation of Duo Rime[鐸韻] and Yao Rime[藥韻], both of which will belong to Dang Rime Group[宕攝] in Late Middle Chinese, has been completed. Mo Rime[陌韻] of Geng Rime Group[梗攝] does not appear to have progressed much out of OC as of the Guo’s period. MC Xi Rime[昔韻] has two different OC Duo Group[鐸部] origins, one of which had a long vowel *–aa-, the other of which had a short *–a-. In Guo’s phonology, the former is postulated to retain –aa-, while the latter is assumed to be in the transitional phase making its way toward –e- which is believed to be occasioned by the 3rd div. medial. Mai Rime[麥韻] and Xi Rime[錫韻] have retained their vowel as –e- without changing its sound value throughout the periods from OC to MC. It is entirely possible that MC Zhen Rime Group[臻攝] and Shan Rime Group[山攝] have been formed. Xian Rime Group[咸攝] does not seem to have been fully formed, while the formation of Qin Rime Group[侵攝] may have been almost completed in the Guo’s system.
참고문헌 (42)
- 權赫埈, "古今韻會擧要에 반영된 重紐 현상 및 그 상관 문제", 中國語文論叢, 19, pp.154~190 (2000), 중국어문연구회
- 權赫埈, "後期中古漢語의 음운체계", 중국어문논총, 22, pp.1~28 (2002), 중국어문연구회
- 권혁준, "郭璞의 晉代 漢語 陰聲韻 음운체계", 중국어문논총, (84), pp.1~74 (2017), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 권혁준, "晉代 郭璞의 音注와 압운에 나타난 개음 체계", 중국어문논총, (89), pp.91~133 (2018), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 권혁준, "晉代 郭璞의 音注에 나타난 성모 체계", 중국어문논총, (95), pp.1~58 (2019), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 권혁준, "郭璞의 晉代 漢語 陽聲韻 음운체계", 중국어문논총, (101), pp.1~55 (2020), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 양 웅, "방언소증" (2012), 소명출판
- 丁 一, "郭璞音 語音系統의 연구", 박사, pp.1993
- "爾雅校箋" (2004), 雲南人民出版社
- 揚 雄, "方言", 國際文化出版公司影印(≪字典彙編≫ 編委會編輯), ~
- "山海經, 四部叢刊⋅子部", ~
- 郭 璞, "穆天子傳" (1967), 中華書局
- 陸德明, "經典釋文" (1991), 山東友誼出版社
- 陳彭年, "宋本廣韻" (1987), 黎明文化事業公司
- 张 溥, "汉魏六朝百三家集題辭注⋅郭弘农集" (1963), 人民文學出版社
- 張 燮, "≪七十二家輯⋅郭弘农集≫≪續修四庫全書集部≫", 北京圖書館藏明末刻本影印, ~
- 戴 震, "方言疏證" (1974), 臺灣中華書局
- 坂井健一, "魏晉南北朝字音硏究" (1975), 汲古書院
- 陳亞川, "≪方言≫郭璞注的反切上字＞", 中國語文, (2), pp.125~131 (1981)
- 陳亞川, "≪方言≫郭璞注的反切下字＞", 中國語文, (6), pp.451~456 (1983)
- 董同龢, "漢語音韻學" (1983), 文史哲出版社
- 黃笑山, "切韻和中唐五代音位系統" (1995), 文津出版社
- 簡啓賢, "郭璞音", 雲南敎育學院學報, (3), pp.74~82 (1990)
- 李方桂, "上古音硏究", 淸華學報, 9(1-2), pp.1~61 (1971)
- 李 榮, "切韻音系" (1973), 鼎文書局
- 李維一, "初唐四傑詩韻", 語言學論叢, 9, pp.258~287 (1982)
- 羅常培, "漢魏晉南北朝韻部演變硏究" (1958), 科學出版社
- 潘悟雲, "漢語歷史音韻學" (2000), 上海敎育出版社
- 彭輝球, "爾雅郭璞注的反切(下)", 湘潭大學學報, (2), pp.112~126 (1993)
- 邵榮芬, "切韻音系" (1982), 中國社會科學出版社
- 王 力, "龍蟲並雕齋文集", pp.1~62 (1936), 中華書局
- 鄭張尙芳, "上古韻母系統和四等、介音、聲調的發源問題", 溫州師院學報, (4), pp.67~90 (1987)
- 鄭張尙芳, "上古音系" (2003), 上海敎育出版社
- 周祖謨, "魏晉宋時期時文韻部的演變", 中國語言學報, (1), pp.91~113 (1983)
- 周祖謨, "魏晉南北朝韻部之演變" (1996), 東大圖書公司
- 周祖謨, "文字音韻訓詁論集" (2000), 北京大學出版社
- Baxter, William, "A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology" (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
- Baxter, W. H., "Old Chinese: A new reconstruction" (2014), Oxford University Press
- Coblin, South, "A Handbook of Eastern Han Sound Glosses" (1983), The Chinese University Press
- Juhl, Robert A., "Phonological Evolution of the Chinese Rhymes : Wei to Liang", Journal of the American Oriental Society, 94, pp.408~430 (1974)
- Karlgren, Bernhard, "中國音韻學硏究" (1915), 商務印書館
- Ting, Pang-hsin, "Chinese Phonology of the Wei-Chin Period : Reconstruction of the Finals as reflected in Poetry" (1975), Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica