본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

刺客의 탄생, 능력의 발견 — ≪史記≫ <專諸傳> 깊이 읽기

The Birth of Assassin-retainer and the Discovery of Ability:A Reading of the Memoir of Zhuanzhu(專諸)

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this article is to clarify the social and cultural meaning of ‘assassin-retainer(刺客)’ newly defined by Sima Qian(司馬遷). In the Memoir of Assassin-retainers, The Grand Scribes Records, the new content of the concept of assassin-retainer is filled by describing the deeds of five figures during the Spring and Autumn Warring States Period. For this reason, if a word is copyrighted, the copyright holder of ‘assassin-retainer’ can be said to be Sima Qian. However, Sima Qian’s ‘assassin-retainer’ has a richer meaning than the modern meaning of a contract assassin. In order to understand the assassin-retainer devised by Sima Qian, it is necessary to consider the social status of assassin-retainer as much as the act of “poking and killing.” In order to reveal these characteristics, it was closely tracked how Sima Qian embodied the Zhuanzhu(專諸) that can be called the original form of assassin-retainer.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to clarify the social and cultural meaning of ‘assassin-retainer(刺客)’ newly defined by Sima Qian(司馬遷). In the Memoir of Assassin-retainers, The Grand Scribes Records, the new content of the concept of assassin-retainer is filled by describing the deeds of five figures during the Spring and Autumn Warring States Period. For this reason, if a word is copyrighted, the copyright holder of ‘assassin-retainer’ can be said to be Sima Qian. However, Sima Qian’s ‘assassin-retainer’ has a richer meaning than the modern meaning of a contract assassin. In order to understand the assassin-retainer devised by Sima Qian, it is necessary to consider the social status of assassin-retainer as much as the act of “poking and killing.” In order to reveal these characteristics, it was closely tracked how Sima Qian embodied the Zhuanzhu(專諸) that can be called the original form of assassin-retainer.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 국어사전편찬실, "한국어대사전" (2009), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원
  2. 漢語大詞典編輯委員會, "漢語大詞典" (1993), 漢語大詞典出版社
  3. 谷衍奎, "漢字源流字典" (2008), 語文出版社
  4. 赤塚忠, "漢和中辭典" (1977), 旺文社
  5. 惠宇, "新世紀漢英大詞典" (2002), 外語敎育與硏究出版社
  6. 許愼, "說文解字注" (2004), 鳳凰出版社
  7. 十三經注疏整理委員會, "尙書注疏" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  8. 十三經注疏整理委員會, "春秋左傳注疏" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  9. 十三經注疏整理委員會, "春秋公羊傳注疏" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  10. 十三經注疏整理委員會, "周禮注疏" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  11. 司馬遷, "史記" (2014), 中華書局
  12. 范曄, "後漢書" (1997), 中華書局
  13. 洪亮吉, "春秋左傳詁" (1987), 中華書局
  14. 徐元誥, "國語集解" (2002), 中華書局
  15. 范祥雍, "戰國策箋證" (2006), 上海古籍出版社
  16. 周生春, "吳越春秋輯校彙考" (2019), 中華書局
  17. 王先謙, "荀子集解" (1994), 中華書局
  18. 王先愼, "韓非子集解" (1995), 中華書局
  19. 許維遹, "呂氏春秋集釋" (2001), 中華書局
  20. 閻振益, "新書校注" (2017), 中華書局
  21. 顧起元, "說略" (1991), 中華書局
  22. 向宗魯, "說苑校證" (2014), 中華書局
  23. 歐陽詢, "藝文類聚" (2007), 中華書局
  24. 李昉, "太平御覽" (2005), 中華書局
  25. 吳兢, "貞觀政要集校" (2014), 中華書局
  26. 吉本道, "中國先秦史の硏究" (2005), 京都大學學術出版會
  27. 顧頡剛, "史林雜識初編" (1963), 中華書局
  28. Bernhard Karlgren, "On the Authenticity and Nature of the Tso Chuan", Göteborgs högskolas ȧrsskrift, 32 (1926)
  29. 이명화, "吳立國과 靑銅文化", 梨花史學硏究, 22 (1995)
  30. 이명화, "良渚문화와 神權政治의 成長", 梨花史學硏究, 23-24 (1997)
  31. 이명화, "趙曄과 ≪吳越春秋≫: 漢代知識人의 歷史認識", 中國古中世史硏究, (12) (2004)
  32. 이명화, "春秋時代吳國의 覇權에 관한 分析", 동양사학연구, 73 (2001)
  33. 김광일, "齊桓公은 왜 曹沫을 살려주었나 - 春秋時期 覇主會盟 시스템의 구축과 信의 가치", 중어중문학, (83), pp.1~29 (2021), 한국중어중문학회[DOI]
  34. 김광일, "의리의 탄생: <<史記>> <刺客.豫讓> 다시 읽기", 중국학보, (96), pp.47~73 (2021), 한국중국학회[DOI]
  35. 伊藤道治, "中國古代王朝の形成" (1975), 創文社
  36. 黃盛璋, "淮夷新考", 文物研究, (5) (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)