對動賓間“的”的若干辨析
The Differentiation on the “De” (的) between Verb and Object
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on the linguistic theory and the language facts of modern Chinese, this paper investigates and differentiates the main grammatical and semantic characteristics of the “de” (的) between verb and object in modern Chinese, differentiates the grammatical attributes of the “de” (的), and then differentiates a number of relevant views put forward by some scholars, adopts the reasonable views and criticizes the unreasonable views. Finally, the following conclusions are obtained: the “de” (的) between verb and object in modern Chinese is a temporal particle, which is not an aspectual marker, does not indicate progressive aspect or perfect aspect, but indicates the activity expressed by the verbs occurs before the speaking time, that is, it marks the absolute past tense. The “de” (的) obviously tends to emphasize the syntactic component next to the left of the verb, so it is a focus marker, and its focus field obviously tends to fall on the syntactic component next to the left of the verb. As for the verb or adverb “shi” (是) and the emphasizing stress, they are not the focus mark forms of the temporal particle “de” (的).
Abstract
Based on the linguistic theory and the language facts of modern Chinese, this paper investigates and differentiates the main grammatical and semantic characteristics of the “de” (的) between verb and object in modern Chinese, differentiates the grammatical attributes of the “de” (的), and then differentiates a number of relevant views put forward by some scholars, adopts the reasonable views and criticizes the unreasonable views. Finally, the following conclusions are obtained: the “de” (的) between verb and object in modern Chinese is a temporal particle, which is not an aspectual marker, does not indicate progressive aspect or perfect aspect, but indicates the activity expressed by the verbs occurs before the speaking time, that is, it marks the absolute past tense. The “de” (的) obviously tends to emphasize the syntactic component next to the left of the verb, so it is a focus marker, and its focus field obviously tends to fall on the syntactic component next to the left of the verb. As for the verb or adverb “shi” (是) and the emphasizing stress, they are not the focus mark forms of the temporal particle “de” (的).
참고문헌 (21)
- 刘公望, "现代汉语的时体助词“的”", 汉语学习, (4), pp.20~24 (1988)
- 刘莹, "从焦点的类型看“的”字结构的语义", 中国语文, (1), pp.28~42 (2021)
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1999), 商务印书馆
- 马学良, "说“哪儿上的”及其“的”", 语言研究, (1), pp.60~70 (1982)
- 石毓智, "论“的”的语法功能的同一性", 世界汉语教学, (1), pp.16~27 (2000)
- 史有为, "表已然义的“的b”补议", 语言研究, (1), pp.249~255 (1984)
- 史有为, "语法研究和探索(精选集)", pp.173~182 (2011), 商务印书馆
- 宋玉柱, "现代汉语语法论集", pp.113~125 (1981), 天津人民出版社
- 宋玉柱, "关于论证方法及其他——同马学良、史有为二位先生商榷", 语言研究, (1), pp.245~248 (1984)
- 完权, "事态句中的“的”", 中国语文, (1), pp.51~61 (2013)
- 汪常莉, "汉语动宾间“的”的语法研究", 硕士, pp.2012
- 王力, "现代中国语法" (1985), 商务印书馆
- 吴福祥, "重谈“动+了+宾”格式的来源和完成体助词“了”的产生", 中国语文, (6), pp.452~462 (1998)
- 熊仲儒, "“是……的”的构件分析", 中国语文, (4), pp.321~330 (2007)
- 袁毓林, "从焦点理论看句尾“的”的句法语义功能", 中国语文, (1), pp.3~16 (2003)
- 张谊生, "略论时制助词“来着”——兼论“来着1”与“的2”以及“来着2”的区别", 大理师专学报, (4), pp.61~67 (2000)
- 赵淑华, "关于“是……的”句", 语言教学与研究, (1), pp.57~66 (1979)
- 赵元任, "汉语口语语法" (1979), 商务印书馆
- 朱德熙, "“的”字结构和判断句(上)", 中国语文, (1), pp.23~27 (1978)
- 朱德熙, "“的”字结构和判断句(下)", 中国语文, (2), pp.104~109 (1978)
- 左思民, "语言规律探索集", pp.1~103 (2014), 世界图书出版公司北京公司
