조선후기 詩論에서 보이는 淸·議論·詩史에 대한 논의와 그 의미

Abstract

It is said that Tangshifeng(唐詩風) was changed into Songshifeng(宋詩風) in the middle of the Joseon Dynasty. So then, was this flow still valid in the latter of Joseon Dynasty? It is the point to study this problem in my paper. For the sake of accomplishing this aim, this study focused on useful symptoms, for example Cheong(淸), disscussion(議論) and history written by poem(詩史). And this study also focused on Chinese poetics as well as Joseon’s poetics. With the result that there are following features. First, there were many critics who criticized the class that loved only Cheong absolutely, and who were fond of the discussion and the history written by poem. This class was distinguished from the other class that pursuit excitement and profundity through image and rhythm. In other word, this class pursuit the usefulness of poem. And it is usual that interchanged aesthetics of poem with usefulness of poem in Joseon Dynasty as well as China. But through the similarity between critics’ criticism in Joseon Dynasty and critics’ criticism in China, we know that Chinese criticism had a decisive effect on Joseon Dynasty’s criticism. Judging from these, it is meaningful that presentation of prototype and pursuit the usefulness of poem.