Students’ Development as Writers and Reviewers through Trained Peer Review in a Writing Course
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This qualitative case study explored how participating in trained peer review affected seven Korean students’ development both as writers and reviewers in a general academic writing class. The data were gathered through students reflective journals and an interview with each student. The findings indicate the overall positive influences of trained peer review on students' development both as reviewers and writers. As reviewers, the students gained confidence in giving feedback and raised an awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of their writing. As writers, the students fostered an ownership of the text and gained a new insight about their writing process and audience. On the other hand, the students' initial struggle with giving peer feedback suggests that the effects of peer review training was not immediate but gradual, but the students gained long-term advantages related exchanging feedback, reflecting on it, and revising. It is concluded that trained peer review has potential to help the students to become self-reliant writers.
Abstract
This qualitative case study explored how participating in trained peer review affected seven Korean students’ development both as writers and reviewers in a general academic writing class. The data were gathered through students reflective journals and an interview with each student. The findings indicate the overall positive influences of trained peer review on students' development both as reviewers and writers. As reviewers, the students gained confidence in giving feedback and raised an awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of their writing. As writers, the students fostered an ownership of the text and gained a new insight about their writing process and audience. On the other hand, the students' initial struggle with giving peer feedback suggests that the effects of peer review training was not immediate but gradual, but the students gained long-term advantages related exchanging feedback, reflecting on it, and revising. It is concluded that trained peer review has potential to help the students to become self-reliant writers.
참고문헌 (22)
- Berg, E. C, "The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.215~241 (1999)
- Carson, J. G, "Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL Writing", 5(1), pp.1~19 (1996)
- Connor, U, "Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), pp.257~276 (1994)
- Hansen, J. G, "Guiding principles for effective peer response", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.31~38 (2005)
- Hedgecock, J, "Collaborative oral", aural revision in foreign language writing instruction, 1992, pp.1(3), 257~276
- Leki,I, "Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes", CATESOL Journal, 3, pp.5~19 (1990)
- Lockhart, C, "Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, function, and content", Language Learning, 45(4), pp.605~655 (1995)
- Mangelsdorf,K, "Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: what do the students think?", ELT Journal, 46(3), pp.274~284 (1992)
- Mangelsdorf, K, "ESL student response stances in a peer-review task", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.235~254 (1992)
- Mendonça, C. O, "Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), pp.745~769 (1994)
- Min,H.T, "Training students to become successful peer reviewers", System, 33(3), pp.293~308 (2005)
- Min,H.T, "The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), pp.118~141 (2006)
- Min,H.T, "Reviewer stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer review training", English for Specific Purposes, 27(3), pp.285~305 (2008)
- Nelson, G. L, "ESL students’ perception of effectiveness in peer response groups", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), pp.113~131 (1998)
- Nelson, G. L, "An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.171~193 (1992)
- Nelson, G. L, "Writing groups and the less proficient ESL student", TESOL Journal, 2(2), pp.23~26 (1993)
- Rollinson,M, "Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.23~30 (2005)
- Stanley,J, "Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.217~233 (1992)
- Tang, G. M, "Peer response in ESL writing", TESL Canada Journal, 2(1), pp.20~38 (1999)
- Tsui, A. B. M, "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
- Villamil, O. S, "Peer revision in the second language classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies and aspects of social behavior", Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), pp.51~75 (1996)
- Zhang,S.Q, "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), pp.209~222 (1995)