본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Korean College Students’ Peer Review and Revision Process and Their Attitudinal Change toward Peer Review

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The current study aims to investigate the impact of Korean EFL college students’ peer review and revision on their essay writing, and to describe how students’ attitudes towards peer review change over time. Twelve Korean college students participated in this five-month peer review and revision process for two essays and their peer review comments and revisions were collected for analysis. The findings show that the participants’ peer review focused on grammar and vocabulary rather than meaning-level changes such as content and organization. Most of review comments were reflected in the revisions but some were not reflected due to the participants’ lack of writing skills and perceptions of effectiveness of peer review comments. The participants became more aware of their own writing and motivated to write as they involved in the peer review process. The results suggest that training in peer review and building trust among peers are essential to effective peer review.

Abstract

The current study aims to investigate the impact of Korean EFL college students’ peer review and revision on their essay writing, and to describe how students’ attitudes towards peer review change over time. Twelve Korean college students participated in this five-month peer review and revision process for two essays and their peer review comments and revisions were collected for analysis. The findings show that the participants’ peer review focused on grammar and vocabulary rather than meaning-level changes such as content and organization. Most of review comments were reflected in the revisions but some were not reflected due to the participants’ lack of writing skills and perceptions of effectiveness of peer review comments. The participants became more aware of their own writing and motivated to write as they involved in the peer review process. The results suggest that training in peer review and building trust among peers are essential to effective peer review.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 안경자, "L2 Writer Identity: A College Student’s Multiple Identities Revealed in English Compositions", 영어교육연구, 24(1), pp.1~21 (2012), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  2. Allen, David, "Relative Second Language Proficiency and the Giving and Receiving of Written Peer Feedback", System, 56, pp.96~106 (2016)
  3. Allen, David, "The Impact of Second Language Proficiency in Dyadic Peer Feedback", Language Teaching Research, 20(4), pp.1~16 (2015)
  4. Beason, Larry, "Feedback and Revision in Writing across the Curriculum Classes", Research in the Teaching of English, 27, pp.27~45 (1993)
  5. Berger, Virginia, "The Effects of Peer and Self-Feedback", CATESOL Journal, 3, pp.215~241 (1990)
  6. Brill, Jennifer M., "Investigating Peer Review as an Intentional Learning Strategy to Foster Collaborative Knowledge-Building in Students of Instructional Design", International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), pp.114~118 (2011)
  7. Brown, H. Douglas, "Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy" (2001), Pearson
  8. Brown, John Seely, "Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning", Educational Researcher, 18(1), pp.32~42 (1989)
  9. 최호성, "Interactional Details in Group Peer Feedback in an L2 Writing Class", 현대영어교육, 13(1), pp.133~147 (2012), 현대영어교육학회
  10. Gere, Anne Ruggles, "Writing Groups: History, Theory, and Implications" (1987), Southern Illinois University Press
  11. Guerrero, Maria, "Activating the ZPD: Mutual Scaffolding in L2 Peer Revision", The Modern Language Journal, 84, pp.51~68 (2000)
  12. Hanjani, Alireza Memari, "EFL Learners’ Written Reflections on Their Experience of Attending a Process Genre-Based, Student-Centred Essay Writing Course", The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), pp.149~166 (2014)
  13. Hansen, Jette G., "Guiding Principles for Effective Peer Response", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.31~38 (2005)
  14. Hirvela, Alan, "Collaborative Writing Instruction and Communities of Readers and Writers", TESOL Journal, 8(2), pp.7~12 (1999)
  15. Hu, Guangwei, "Using Peer Review with Chinese ESL Student Writers", Language Teaching Research, 9, pp.321~342 (2005)
  16. Hyland, Ken, "Feedback on Second Language Participants’Writing", Language Teaching, 39(2), pp.83~101 (2006)
  17. Ivankova, Nataliya V., "Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction", pp.135~161 (2009), Palgrave Macmillan
  18. Jessner, Ulrike, "Linguistic Awareness in Multilinguals" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
  19. 강동호, "Feedback on EFL Writing: Teacher, Peer, and Self-review", Foreign Languages Education, 15(1), pp.1~22 (2008), 한국외국어교육학회
  20. Leki, Ilona, "Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom", pp.57~68 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  21. Lin, Wen Chuan, "Exploring Participants’ Perceptions of Integrating Wiki Technology and Peer Feedback into English Writing Courses", English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10, pp.88~103 (2011)
  22. Liu, Jun, "Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms" (2002), University of Michigan Press
  23. Lundstrom, Kristi, "To Give is Better Than to Receive: The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, pp.30~43 (2009)
  24. Mangelsdorf, Kate, "Peer Reviews in the ESL Composition: What Do the Students Think?", ELT Journal, 46, pp.274~284 (1992)
  25. Mendonça, Cassia O., "Peer Review Negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), pp.745~769 (1994)
  26. Min, Hui Tzu, "The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, pp.118~141 (2006)
  27. Mittan, Robert., "Richness in Writing: Empowering ESL Participants", pp.207~219 (1989), Longman
  28. Morgan, Brett, "University Student Attitudes towards Peer Review in EFL Writing: A Quantitative Study", Language Education in Asia, 5(1), pp.93~116 (2014)
  29. Reid, Joy, "The Radical Outliner and the Radical Brainstormer: A Perspective on Composition Processes", TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), pp.529~534 (1984)
  30. 류호열, "Revision behaviors in a peer-reviewed multi-draft writing context", 영어교과교육, 12(2), pp.195~215 (2013), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  31. Susser, Bernard, "Process Approaches in ESL", EFL Writing Instruction, 1994, pp.3(1), 31~47
  32. Tsui, Amy B. M., "Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
  33. Villamil, Olga S., "Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues", pp.23~41 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  34. von Glasersfeld, Ernst, "Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning" (1995), Falmer Press
  35. Wenger, Etienne, "Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  36. White, Jeremy, "Peer Review in EFL Writing:Teacher Attitudes", Perspectives, 22(2), pp.20~27 (2014)
  37. White, Ron, "Process Writing" (1991), Longman
  38. Williams, Jessica, "The Potential Role(s) of Writing in Second Language Development", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, pp.321~331 (2012)
  39. Woolf, Nicholas H., "Evaluating Peer Review in an Introductory Instructional Design Course", Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(3), pp.20~42 (2001)
  40. 윤성원, "Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes through Writing Activities in an EFL University Writing Course", 현대영어교육, 13(3), pp.21~38 (2012), 현대영어교육학회
  41. Zamel, Vivian, "Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning", TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), pp.195~209 (1982)
  42. Zamel, Vivian, "The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies", TESOL Quarterly, 16, pp.165~187 (1983)
  43. Zhang, Shuqiang, "Reexamining the Affective Advantage of Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), pp.209~222 (1995)
  44. Zhao, Huahui, "Investigating Teacher-Supported Peer Assessment for EFL Writing", ELT Journal, 68(2), pp.155~168 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)