Korean College Students’ Reflections on Peer Reviews and Variables Involved in the Review Process
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study describes how Korean college students perceive reviewing their peers’ drafts over the course of one semester and what variables might affect their review process. Twenty-six students enrolled in the teacher researcher’s two writing courses participated in this study. The data came from the students’ reflections on their peer reviews and the researcher’s observations/descriptions of the review process, and informal interviews with several students. The findings indicated that the students in this study valued peer reviews, but they were reluctant to write comments on peers’ drafts, especially at the beginning of the semester. However, toward the end of the semester, they felt more comfortable in providing written comments on peers’ drafts, particularly when they developed positive relationships with their peers. Suggestions for effective peer activity have also been provided.
Abstract
This study describes how Korean college students perceive reviewing their peers’ drafts over the course of one semester and what variables might affect their review process. Twenty-six students enrolled in the teacher researcher’s two writing courses participated in this study. The data came from the students’ reflections on their peer reviews and the researcher’s observations/descriptions of the review process, and informal interviews with several students. The findings indicated that the students in this study valued peer reviews, but they were reluctant to write comments on peers’ drafts, especially at the beginning of the semester. However, toward the end of the semester, they felt more comfortable in providing written comments on peers’ drafts, particularly when they developed positive relationships with their peers. Suggestions for effective peer activity have also been provided.
참고문헌 (40)
- Anson, C. M., "Response and the social construction of error", Assessing Writing, 7(1), pp.5~21 (2000)
- Berg, E. C., "The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.215~241 (1999)
- Carson, J. G., "Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction", Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), pp.1~19 (1996)
- 조수경, "The Effects of Giving Peer Feedback: Case Studies of Korean Learners of English", 영어학연구, 17(2), pp.101~125 (2011), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
- 조윤경, "The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Korean EFL Writing Classrooms", 영어교육연구, 17(4), pp.33~59 (2005), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
- 최재호, "Does Peer Feedback Affect L2 Writers’ L2 Learning, Composition Skills, Metacognitive Knowledge, and L2 Writing Anxiety?", 영어교육, 68(3), pp.187~213 (2013), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- Connor, U., "Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), pp.257~276 (1994)
- Cresswell, J. W., "Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches" (2003), Sage
- Crookes, G., "Comparing teacher and student responses to written work", TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), pp.181~188 (1994)
- Flower, L., "A cognitive process theory of writing", College Composition and Communication, 32(4), pp.365~387 (1981)
- Guerrero, M., "Social‐cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision", The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), pp.484~496 (1994)
- Hyland, K., "Teaching and researching writing" (2009), Pearson Education
- Jacobs, G. M., "Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), pp.307~317 (1998)
- Johnson, A. P., "A short guide to action research" (2005), Pearson Education
- Lam, R., "A peer review training workshop: Coaching students to give and evaluate peer feedback", TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), pp.114~127 (2010)
- Lee, G., "Speaking up: Six Korean students’ oral participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars", English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), pp.142~156 (2009)
- Lee, G., "Constructing trust between teacher and students through feedback and revision cycles in an EFL writing classroom", Written Communication, 25(4), pp.506~537 (2008)
- Lee, G., "Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher-student relationship on revision processes of EFL college students taking a composition course", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), pp.165~182 (2008)
- Lee, I., "Peer reviews in a Hong Kong tertiary classroom", TESL Canada Journal, 15(1), pp.58~69 (1997)
- Leki, I., "The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college‐level writing classes", Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), pp.203~218 (1991)
- Mangelsdorf, K., "ESL student response stances in a peerreview task", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.235~254 (1992)
- Mertler, C. A., "Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom" (2008), Sage
- Min, H.-T., "Training students to become successful peer reviewers", System, 33(2), pp.293~308 (2005)
- Moon, Y., "The nature of peer revisions in an EFL writing class of a Korean university", English Teaching, 55(1), pp.119~140 (2000)
- Nelson, G. L., "ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), pp.113~131 (1998)
- Nelson, G. L., "Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?", TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), pp.135~141 (1993)
- Nolen, A. L., "Action research in education: Addressing gaps in ethical principles and practices", Educational Researcher, 36(7), pp.401~407 (2007)
- Paulus, T. M., "The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.265~289 (1999)
- Polio, C., "The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), pp.375~389 (2012)
- Rollinson, P., "Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.23~30 (2005)
- Shaughnessy, M., "Some needed research on writing", College Composition and Communication, 28(4), pp.317~320 (1977)
- 소리, "The Impact of Peer Response on L2 Writing in Blended Learning in Higher Education", 응용언어학, 30(4), pp.205~234 (2014), 한국응용언어학회
- Stanley, J., "Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.217~233 (1992)
- Suh, JaeSuk, "Peer Feedback Interactions in EFL Compositions: Written Feedback versus Oral Feedback", 영어교육, 60(3), pp.91~116 (2005), 한국영어교육학회
- Tsui, A. B. M., "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
- Yang, M., "A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), pp.179~200 (2006)
- Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society: The development of higher pshychological process" (1978), Harvard University Press
- Zamel, V., "Writing: The process of discovering meaning", TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), pp.195~209 (1982)
- Zhang, S., "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), pp.209~222 (1995)
- Zhang, S., "Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.321~326 (1999)