EFL College Students’ Attitudes on Peer Review Practices: A Case Study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed to examine EFL students’ attitudes toward peer feedback practices in an L2 writing course where the students used English to provide for feedback. In the process of writing, peer feedback has been widely practiced due to instructional implications. The implications involves its positive impacts on writing quality, affective filter, a sense of audience, and a sense of learning community. In a similar vein, this study examined peer feedback carried out in group and delivered in English in one L2 writing course. Data for this study were students’ reflective journal entries in which they elaborated on their insightful understanding of peer feedback practices. The analysis of the data showed four marked areas. That is, the students made critical comments on writing problem, audience, credibility of feedback, and group formation and interaction. The findings have pedagogical implications about how and what EFL writing instructors can facilitate the process of peer review.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine EFL students’ attitudes toward peer feedback practices in an L2 writing course where the students used English to provide for feedback. In the process of writing, peer feedback has been widely practiced due to instructional implications. The implications involves its positive impacts on writing quality, affective filter, a sense of audience, and a sense of learning community. In a similar vein, this study examined peer feedback carried out in group and delivered in English in one L2 writing course. Data for this study were students’ reflective journal entries in which they elaborated on their insightful understanding of peer feedback practices. The analysis of the data showed four marked areas. That is, the students made critical comments on writing problem, audience, credibility of feedback, and group formation and interaction. The findings have pedagogical implications about how and what EFL writing instructors can facilitate the process of peer review.
참고문헌 (10)
- 구경연, "Effectiveness of Two Formats of Peer Response in College Advanced Academic English Composition: Individuals versus Groups", 언어과학연구, (57), pp.1~24 (2011), 언어과학회
- Jae Kyung Kim, "An Emic View on Peer Response and the Actual Revisions in Electronic and Traditional Modes", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 10(2), pp.70~97 (2007), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- 유호정, "A Review on Peer Feedback Studies in a Korean EFL Writing Context from the Perspectives of Research and Pedagogy", 신영어영문학, (54), pp.209~226 (2013), 신영어영문학회
- 문도식, "Students’ Development as Writers and Reviewers through Trained Peer Review in a Writing Course", 영어영문학21, 23(3), pp.289~314 (2010), 21세기영어영문학회[DOI]
- 최호성, "Why Did They Choose There? Korean Parents’ Reasons for Sending Their Children to Southeast Asian ESL Countries", 신영어영문학, (66), pp.33~54 (2017), 신영어영문학회[DOI]
- V. Braun, , Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp.77~101 (2006)
- 허명혜, "Feedback on Peer Feedback in EFL Composing: Four Stories", 영어영문학, 57(6), pp.977~998 (2011), 한국영어영문학회[DOI]
- 주미진, "Teacher and peer feedback: Learner perceptions and the efficacy for improvement in L2 writing", 영어교육연구, 22(3), pp.1~21 (2010), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
- 이지연, "한국 대학생의 영작문 활동 시 나타나는 동료피드백의 양상 및 이에 대한 인식", 현대영어교육, 11(3), pp.134~161 (2010), 현대영어교육학회
- D. Ferris, "Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice" (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates