본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유형론에서 본 영어의 양상

The Typological Approach to Modality in English

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper aims to discuss English modal system and modal evolution from a perspective of language typology. This approach contains classification of English modal categories with regard to the target and the domain of modality, and description of the methods of expressing modality. Also, it includes the discussion about diachronic changes of the meaning of English modal auxiliaries, in relation to the evolution of modal categories. First, English modal categories are divided into 3 types according to their target of modality, such as participant-oriented modality, event-oriented modality, and proposition-oriented modality. They are also divided into 4 types according to their domain of modality, such as epistemic modality, deontic modality, volitive modality, and facultative modality. Second, English has the modal system in which it expresses modality through various lexical and syntactic methods. The main lexical method is to insert lexical items of modal meanings, but other lexical devices, such as modal tags and modal particles, are used sometimes. However, the most important method of expressing modality in English is to use modal verbs, like modal auxiliaries, semi-modal auxiliaries, and periphrastic constructions. The morphological method is not used in English modal system because subjunctive as a mood system is not justified. Instead, using past tense form, that is, modal past is frequently found in expressing ‘tentativeness' or ‘unreal situation'. Third, the polysemy of English modal auxiliaries is the result of their diachronic changes, which were caused by the evolution of modal categories. The evolution of modal categories is usually realized by the enlargement of their target and domain in expressing modality.

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss English modal system and modal evolution from a perspective of language typology. This approach contains classification of English modal categories with regard to the target and the domain of modality, and description of the methods of expressing modality. Also, it includes the discussion about diachronic changes of the meaning of English modal auxiliaries, in relation to the evolution of modal categories. First, English modal categories are divided into 3 types according to their target of modality, such as participant-oriented modality, event-oriented modality, and proposition-oriented modality. They are also divided into 4 types according to their domain of modality, such as epistemic modality, deontic modality, volitive modality, and facultative modality. Second, English has the modal system in which it expresses modality through various lexical and syntactic methods. The main lexical method is to insert lexical items of modal meanings, but other lexical devices, such as modal tags and modal particles, are used sometimes. However, the most important method of expressing modality in English is to use modal verbs, like modal auxiliaries, semi-modal auxiliaries, and periphrastic constructions. The morphological method is not used in English modal system because subjunctive as a mood system is not justified. Instead, using past tense form, that is, modal past is frequently found in expressing ‘tentativeness' or ‘unreal situation'. Third, the polysemy of English modal auxiliaries is the result of their diachronic changes, which were caused by the evolution of modal categories. The evolution of modal categories is usually realized by the enlargement of their target and domain in expressing modality.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김선, "영어의 양상표현 in: 언어유형론 III", pp.236~247 (2008), 월인
  2. 이기갑, "양상의 유형론 in: 언어유형론 III", pp.165~200 (2008), 월인
  3. Bybee, J. L, "The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), University of Chicago Press
  4. Chafe, W, "Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing in Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology", pp.261~272 (1986), Albex
  5. Chung, S, "Tense, Aspect, and Mood in Language Typology and Syntactic Description III", pp.261~272 (1985), The Cambridge University Press
  6. Coates,J, "The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries" (1983), Croom Helm Ltd
  7. Haan, F, "Typological Approach to Modality in The Expression of Modality", pp.27~71 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
  8. Hegneveld, K, "Mood and Modality in Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word-formation", pp.1190~1202 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
  9. Huddleston, R, "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), The Cambridge University Press
  10. Lyons, J, "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
  11. Palmer, F, "Modality and the English Modals" (1990), Longmans
  12. Palmer, F, "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  13. Quirk, R, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  14. Steele, S, "Past and Irrealis: Just What does it All Mean?", International Journal of American Linguistics, 41, pp.200~217 (1975)
  15. Thompson, S. A, "A Quantative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English in Approaches to Grammaticalization", pp.313~329 (1991), John Benjamins
  16. Wright, E. H, "An Essay in Modal Logic" (1951), North Holland

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)