본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이중목적어 동사의 분포

Distribution of Verbs of Double Object Constructions

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

In addition to the verb give, verbs of GIVING such as pay, reimburse, teach, show, tell, feed, serve, bequeath, issue, award, accord, afford, offer, lend, loan, ask, promise, guarantee, prescribe, leave, owe, allow, permit, grant, allot, allocate, assign, deny, refuse, grudge, begrudge are found in double object constructions of GIVING. Verbs of SENDING such as mail, fax, wire, email, radio, drop, write (write and send), telephone, telegraph, sell, trade, flog, send, hand, pass, throw, chuck, fling, cast, blow, shoot, slide, slip, shin, ship, fetch, return, forward, advance, bring, take, pour, pull, push, drag are found in double object constructions of GIVING. Verbs of PREPARING such as make, cook, boil, bake, mix, fix, light, melt, cut, sew, set, prepare, clear are found in double object constructions of GIVING. Verbs of GETTING such as get, buy, order, find, choose, prepare, book, reserve, catch, win, wish, secure, leave, steal, take, save, spare, answer, quote, cite are found in double object constructions of GIVING. Verbs of MAKING such as cause, make, build, bake, bear, incur, pose, do, knit, draw, paint, color, play (song), play (trick), sing, spin, write (create), read, kiss, flash, score, earn, bang, mumble, mutter, whisper are found in double object constructions of GIVING. Verbs of TAKING-OFF such as forgive, pardon, fine, charge, envy are found in double object constructions of TAKING-OFF. Verbs of TAKING such as steal, take, ask, envy, cost, save, spare are found in double object constructions of TAKING- OFF. Verbs of LOSING such as loose, kill, slay, restrict are found in double object constructions of TAKING-OFF. Steal, take, save, spare are found both in double constructions of GIVING and of TAKING-OFF.

Abstract

In addition to the verb give, verbs of GIVING such as pay, reimburse, teach, show, tell, feed, serve, bequeath, issue, award, accord, afford, offer, lend, loan, ask, promise, guarantee, prescribe, leave, owe, allow, permit, grant, allot, allocate, assign, deny, refuse, grudge, begrudge are found in double object constructions of GIVING. Verbs of SENDING such as mail, fax, wire, email, radio, drop, write (write and send), telephone, telegraph, sell, trade, flog, send, hand, pass, throw, chuck, fling, cast, blow, shoot, slide, slip, shin, ship, fetch, return, forward, advance, bring, take, pour, pull, push, drag are found in double object constructions of GIVING. Verbs of PREPARING such as make, cook, boil, bake, mix, fix, light, melt, cut, sew, set, prepare, clear are found in double object constructions of GIVING. Verbs of GETTING such as get, buy, order, find, choose, prepare, book, reserve, catch, win, wish, secure, leave, steal, take, save, spare, answer, quote, cite are found in double object constructions of GIVING. Verbs of MAKING such as cause, make, build, bake, bear, incur, pose, do, knit, draw, paint, color, play (song), play (trick), sing, spin, write (create), read, kiss, flash, score, earn, bang, mumble, mutter, whisper are found in double object constructions of GIVING. Verbs of TAKING-OFF such as forgive, pardon, fine, charge, envy are found in double object constructions of TAKING-OFF. Verbs of TAKING such as steal, take, ask, envy, cost, save, spare are found in double object constructions of TAKING- OFF. Verbs of LOSING such as loose, kill, slay, restrict are found in double object constructions of TAKING-OFF. Steal, take, save, spare are found both in double constructions of GIVING and of TAKING-OFF.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 박한기, "TAKE의 이중목적어 구조", 영어영문학21, 24(4), pp.217~236 (2011), 21세기영어영문학회
  2. 송석만, "영어 이중목적어 구문의 의미적ㆍ화용적 분석", 영미어문학연구, 19(1), pp.131~149 (2003), 영미어문학회
  3. 신현숙, "동사 (앉다", 서다, 한글, pp.1995[DOI]
  4. 심영숙, "원형 의미 확장에 따른 어휘의 다의성 분석", 한국인지과학회 춘계학술발표회논문집 (1998)
  5. 임지룡, "다의어의 비대칭 양상 연구", 언어과학연구, 15, pp.309~331 (1998), 언어과학연구회
  6. Benjamin B., "Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives", Linguistic Inquiry, 41(2), pp.287~305 (2010)
  7. Brass, A., "A Note on Anaphor and Double Objects", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.347~354 (1986)
  8. Bresnan, J. I., "Passive in Lexical Theory, In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relation" (1982), Harvard University Press
  9. Dowty, D., "Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
  10. Givon, T., "Direct Object and Dative Shifting: Semantic and Pragmatic Case, In Objects: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations" (1984), Academic Press
  11. Goldberg, A. E., "The Inherent Semantics of Argument Structure: The case of the English Ditransitive Construction", Cognitive Linguistics, 3, pp.37~74 (1992)
  12. Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
  13. Goldberg, "Surface Generalizations: An Alternative to alternation", Cognitive Linguistics, 13(4), pp.327~356 (2002)
  14. Gropen, J, "The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English", Language, 65, pp.203~257 (1989)
  15. Hale, K., "On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations, In The view from Building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.53~109 (1993), MIT Press
  16. Harley, H., "Possession and the Double Object Construction, In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2", pp.31~70 (2003), John Benjamins
  17. "Ditransitive Constructions: The Verb ‘Give.' The World Atlas of Language Structures Online" (2009)[URL]
  18. "Double Objects Re-Revisited—Case, Aspect, and Measuring Out"[URL]
  19. Kittila, S., "The anomaly of the verb ‘give' explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity", Linguistics, 44(3), pp.569~612 (2006)
  20. Lakoff, G., "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1987), University of Chicago Press
  21. Lakoff, G., "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
  22. Langacker, R. W., "An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar", Cognitive Science, 10, pp.1~40 (1986)
  23. Langacker, R. W., "Nouns and Verbs", Language, 63, pp.53~94 (1987)
  24. Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol.1" (1987), Stanford University Press
  25. Langacker, R. W., "Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics Research 1" (1990), Mouton de Gruyter
  26. Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive Application" (1991), Stanford University Press
  27. Langacker, R. W., "Reference-Point Constructions", Cognitive linguistics, 4, pp.1~38 (1993)
  28. Langacker, R. W., "Constituency, dependency, and conceptual grouping", Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), pp.1~32 (1997)
  29. Langacker, R. W., "Grammar and conceptualization, In Cognitive Linguistics Research 14" (1999), Mouton de Gruyte
  30. Langacker, R. W., "Virtual Reality", Studies in Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), pp.77~103 (1999)
  31. Langacker, R. W., "Viewing and Experiential Reporting in Cognitive Grammar, In Linguagem e Cognicao: A Perspectiva da Linguistica Cognitiva", pp.19~49 (2001), Associa cao Portuguesa de Linguistica and Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Faculdade de Filosofia de Braga
  32. Langacker, R. W., "Topic, Subject, and Possessor, In A Cognitive Approach to the Verb: Morphological and Constructional Perspectives", pp.11~48 (2001), Mouton de Gruyter
  33. Langacker, R. W., "Discourse in Cognitive Grammar", Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), pp.143~188 (2001)
  34. Larson, R., "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
  35. "Verbs and Constructions: Where Next? West Coast Conference on Linguistics" (2004)[URL]
  36. Malchukov, A., "Ditransitive Constructions; A Typological Overview", ~ (2007)
  37. Michaelis, S., "Ditransitive constructions: Creole languages in a cross-linguistic perspective", Creolica, 4(23) (2003)
  38. Miller, G., "Semantic relations among words, In Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality" (1978), Harvard University Press
  39. Pesetsky, D., "Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades" (1995), The MIT Press
  40. Pinker, S., "Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure" (1989), MIT Press
  41. Plank, F., "Direkte indirekte Objekte: Was uns lehren lehrt", Leuvense Bijdragen, 76, pp.37~61 (1987)
  42. Polinsky, M., "Some Asymmetries in the Double Object Construction, In Discourse and Cognition Bridging the Gap" (1988), CSLI
  43. Lambrecht, K., "Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topics Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  44. Rappaport H. M., "Building Verb Meanings, In The Projection of Arguments", pp.97~134 (1998), CSLI Publications
  45. Rosch E. H., "Natural Catecories", Cognitive Psychology, 4, pp.328~350 (1973)
  46. Rosch, E. H., "Cognitive reference points", Cognitive Psychology, 7, pp.532~547 (1975)
  47. Svenonius, P., "Icelandic Case and the Structure of Events", Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 5, pp.197~225 (2002)
  48. Taylor JR, "Linguistic Categorization: Prototype in Linguistic Theory" (1995), Clarendon Press
  49. Thomson, S., "The Iconicity of Dative Shift in English, In Syntactic Inconicity and Freeze: The Human Dimension" (1995), Mouton de Gruyter
  50. Wechsler, S., "The Domain of Direct Case Assignment", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, pp.629~664 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)