본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 이중타동사의 보문유형과 분포빈도에 대한 COCA 코퍼스 분석

A COCA Analysis of Complement Types and Distribution Frequency of English Ditransitive Verbs

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The goal of this paper is to analyse the types of complements that six English ditransitive verbs take and the ditransitive verbs’ distributions, based on 3,000 data from Corpus of American English (COCA). I considered how many double object constructions were found according to syntactic categories and grammatical functions in the data. Then, I examined the ditransitive verbs in terms of the types of complements and the proportion of each type of complements, following Greenbaum and Quirk (1985). The results of this study showed that a ditransitive verb should not be claimed to construct a double object construction in general, or in most cases. Rather, it should be contended that the ditransitive verb might construct a double object construction only in a few cases. Moreover, any symmetry among the types of complements or between noun and pronoun has not been found, which does not support generalizations about dative movement or dative shift.

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to analyse the types of complements that six English ditransitive verbs take and the ditransitive verbs’ distributions, based on 3,000 data from Corpus of American English (COCA). I considered how many double object constructions were found according to syntactic categories and grammatical functions in the data. Then, I examined the ditransitive verbs in terms of the types of complements and the proportion of each type of complements, following Greenbaum and Quirk (1985). The results of this study showed that a ditransitive verb should not be claimed to construct a double object construction in general, or in most cases. Rather, it should be contended that the ditransitive verb might construct a double object construction only in a few cases. Moreover, any symmetry among the types of complements or between noun and pronoun has not been found, which does not support generalizations about dative movement or dative shift.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Barss, Andrew, "A note on anaphora and double objects", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.347~354 (1986)
  2. Chomsky, Noam, "The logical structure of linguistic thoery" (1975), Plenum
  3. Cowan, Ron, "The teacher’s grammar of English, A course book and reference guide" (2010), Cambridge University Press
  4. Croft, William, "Radical construction grammar, syntactic theory in typological perspective" (2001), Oxford University Press
  5. Gelderen, Elly van, "An introduction to the grammar of English" (2010), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  6. Goldberg, Adele, "Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
  7. Greenbaum, Sydney, "A student’s grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman Press
  8. Jackendoff, Ray, "On Larson’s treatment of the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.427~456 (1990)
  9. 강남길, "Logophors and Discourse Participants", 영어영문학연구, 52(3), pp.1~19 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회
  10. Kayne, Richard S., "Connectedness and binary branching" (1983), Foris Publications
  11. 김기수, "시간과 이동의 은유적 연결", 영어영문학연구, 57(3), pp.19~38 (2015), 한국중앙영어영문학회
  12. Krifka, Manfred, "Semantic and pragmatic conditions for the dative alternation", 2003 KASELL International Conference on English Language and Linguistics (2003)
  13. Larson, Richard K, "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(Summer), pp.335~392 (1988)
  14. 이제원, "이중목적어구문의 구조와 LF 복사본 삭제 제약", 영어영문학연구, 56(1), pp.261~281 (2014), 한국중앙영어영문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)