'제거'의 이중 목적어 구조
Double Object Constructions Headed by 'depriving' Verbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper has collected, analyzed and classified double object constructions headed by <depriving> verbs. Verbs of <excusing> such as forgive, pardon, excuse and condone take two objects to form the double object construction {A v<α<depriving>> H X}, where X is taken away from H. Thus {A forgive H X} means “A takes away the punishment for X from H.” Verbs of <asking> such as ask, charge, fine and envy construct the double object construction {A v<α<depriving>> H X}, where A wants X from H. Thus {A charge H X} means “A asks to take X away from H who owes X to A.” Verbs of <taking> such as take and steal extend their meaning synecdochically to construct the double object construction {A v<depriving<β>> H X}, where X is taken away from H. Thus {A steal H X} means “A takes X away from H by stealing X.” Verbs of <losing> such as kill, slay, lose and cost also extend their meaning to construct the double object construction {A v<depriving<β>> H X}, where X is taken away from H. Thus {A lose H X} means “A takes X away from H by destroying X, which was useful to H.”
Abstract
This paper has collected, analyzed and classified double object constructions headed by <depriving> verbs. Verbs of <excusing> such as forgive, pardon, excuse and condone take two objects to form the double object construction {A v<α<depriving>> H X}, where X is taken away from H. Thus {A forgive H X} means “A takes away the punishment for X from H.” Verbs of <asking> such as ask, charge, fine and envy construct the double object construction {A v<α<depriving>> H X}, where A wants X from H. Thus {A charge H X} means “A asks to take X away from H who owes X to A.” Verbs of <taking> such as take and steal extend their meaning synecdochically to construct the double object construction {A v<depriving<β>> H X}, where X is taken away from H. Thus {A steal H X} means “A takes X away from H by stealing X.” Verbs of <losing> such as kill, slay, lose and cost also extend their meaning to construct the double object construction {A v<depriving<β>> H X}, where X is taken away from H. Thus {A lose H X} means “A takes X away from H by destroying X, which was useful to H.”
참고문헌 (21)
- 전기정, "二重目的語 構文의 述語動詞 考察", 중국어문학, (42), pp.547~573 (2003), 영남중국어문학회
- 박한기, "Onions (1932) 문장 5형식에 대한 이원적 접근—Be-동사 vs. Be-동사 이외의 동사", 언어연구, 27(3), pp.499~521 (2010), 언어정보연구소
- 박한기, "TAKE의 이중목적어 구조", 영어영문학21, 24(4), pp.217~236 (2011), 21세기영어영문학회
- 박한기, "이중목적어 동사의 분포", 영어영문학21, 25(3), pp.137~185 (2012), 21세기영어영문학회
- 송석만, "영어 이중목적어 구문의 의미적ㆍ화용적 분석", 영미어문학연구, 19(1), pp.131~149 (2003), 영미어문학회
- Benjamin B., "Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives", Linguistic Inquiry, 41(2), pp.287~305 (2010)
- Brass, A., "A Note on Anaphor and Double Objects", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.347~354 (1986)
- Driven, R., "Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata, In Metonymy in language and thought" (1999), Benjamins
- Goldberg, A. E., "The Inherent Semantics of Argument Structure: The Case of the English Ditransitive Construction", Cognitive Linguistics, 3, pp.37~74 (1992)
- Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Goldberg, "Surface Generalizations: An Alternative to alternation", Cognitive Linguistics, 13(4), pp.327~356 (2002)
- Hale, K., "On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations, In The view from Building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.53~109 (1993), MIT Press
- Harley, H., "Possession and the Double Object Construction, In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2", pp.31~70 (2003), John Benjamins
- Hudson, R, "So Called Double Objects and Grammatical Relations", Language, 68, pp.251~276 (1992)
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Structures" (1990), MIT-Press
- Kittila, S., "The anomaly of the verb ‘give' explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity", Linguistics, 44(3), pp.569~612 (2006)
- Kovecses, Z., "Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View", Cognitive Linguistics, 9, pp.37~77 (1998)
- Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive Application" (1991), Stanford University Press
- Larson, R, "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
- "Introducing Arguments" (2010)[URL]
- Taylor JR, "Linguistic Categorization: Prototype in Linguistic Theory" (1989), Clarendon Press