관계사구문에서의 리레이블링과 스머글링 접근법에 관한 연구
Re(labeling) Analysis and A Smuggling Approach in Relative Clauses
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to solve a relativization analysis problem which involves relabeling. Cecchetto and Donati (2015) argued that relative constructions are puzzling because they are clauses which have a nominal distribution. That is, the process from a clause to a nominal expression entails a change in labeling (i.e. re(labeling). Cecchetto and Donati (2015) also stated that the relative clauses are not CPs but NPs because the determiner of the head of the antecedent is merged with NP in the matrix clause. According to the raising analysis in relative clauses, the antecedent in the matrix originally derives from the object of the embedded verb. However, when the object of the verb in the relabeling analysis of relative clauses moves to the complement or the object position of matrix verb, it goes from A through A’ and then to A position again. This movement cannot be permitted due to violating the Chain Uniformity Condition. Therefore, I argue that this movement in relabeling analysis of relative clauses has a theoretical problem. Applying Hicks’ Smuggling Approach (2009) to relabeling analysis can solve this weakness in relative clauses. I show that the smuggled object with a Null OP in the relabeling analysis of relative clauses moves to the antecedent position in the matrix such as the object in Tough constructions which complies with the Chain Uniformity Condition.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to solve a relativization analysis problem which involves relabeling. Cecchetto and Donati (2015) argued that relative constructions are puzzling because they are clauses which have a nominal distribution. That is, the process from a clause to a nominal expression entails a change in labeling (i.e. re(labeling). Cecchetto and Donati (2015) also stated that the relative clauses are not CPs but NPs because the determiner of the head of the antecedent is merged with NP in the matrix clause. According to the raising analysis in relative clauses, the antecedent in the matrix originally derives from the object of the embedded verb. However, when the object of the verb in the relabeling analysis of relative clauses moves to the complement or the object position of matrix verb, it goes from A through A’ and then to A position again. This movement cannot be permitted due to violating the Chain Uniformity Condition. Therefore, I argue that this movement in relabeling analysis of relative clauses has a theoretical problem. Applying Hicks’ Smuggling Approach (2009) to relabeling analysis can solve this weakness in relative clauses. I show that the smuggled object with a Null OP in the relabeling analysis of relative clauses moves to the antecedent position in the matrix such as the object in Tough constructions which complies with the Chain Uniformity Condition.
참고문헌 (22)
- Bhatt, Rajesh, "The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification", Natural Languages Semantics, 10, pp.43~90 (2002)
- Bianchi, Valentina, "Consequences of antisymmetry:Headed relative clauses" (1999), Mouton de Gruyter
- Borsley, Robert D, "Relatives clauses and the theory of phrase structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.629~647 (1997)
- Browning, Marguerite, "Null operator constructions", 박사, pp.1987
- Cecchetto, Carlo, "(Re)labeling" (2015), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Forbis
- Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in hohor of Jean—Roger Vergnaud" (2006), MIT Press
- Cinque, Guglielmo, "La sintassi dei pronomi relativi ‘cui’ e ‘quale’ nell’italiano moderno", Rivista di Frammatic Generative, 3, pp.31~126 (1978)
- Collins, Chris, "A smuggling approach to raising in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.289~298 (2005)
- Collins, Chris, "A smuggling approach to the passive in English", Syntax, 8, pp.81~120 (2005)
- Donati, Caterina, "Relabeling heads: A unified account for relativization structures", Linguistic Inquiry, 42, pp.519~560 (2011)
- Doron, Edit, "The syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns", Texas Linguistic forum, 19, pp.1~34 (1982)
- Hicks, Glyn, "Tough-Constructions and Their Derivation", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.535~566 (2009)
- Sarah, Hulsey, "Sorting out relative clauses", Natural Language Semantics, 14, pp.111~137 (2009)
- Iatriou, Sabine, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.189~238 (2001), MI Press
- Kayne, Richard, "French Syntax" (1975), MIT Press
- Kayne, Richard, "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Lasnik, Howard, "A Course in Minimalist Syntax" (2005), Blackwell
- Sauerland, Uli, "The interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted structures", pp.205~226 (2003), John Benjamins
- Vergnaud, Jean R, "French Relative Clauses", 박사, pp.1974