Relative Clauses and Labeling Algorithm
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to show how labeling algorithm in Chomsky (2013, 2014) can explain the syntax of relative clauses. To achieve this, we will propose the following assumptions. First, we will argue that the relative clause is right-adjoined to a head N and a relative operator OP moves from the base position through [Spec, TP] to [Spec, CP]. Second, we will suggest that C transfers its φ-feature to T, stranding its wh-feature on C under the C-T inheritance system in Chomsky (2008). Third, we will assume that the relative operator carries its φ-feature and wh-feature. Our analysis of relative clauses has the advantages of accounting for the following phenomena. First, we can account for the free alternation of the relative pronoun in English. Second, we can explain anti that-trace effect in relative clauses. Third, we can explain the highest subject restriction which shows that the highest subject position in the relative clause cannot be occupied by a resumptive pronoun. Finally, we can account for the free alternation of Nez Perce relative pronouns.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to show how labeling algorithm in Chomsky (2013, 2014) can explain the syntax of relative clauses. To achieve this, we will propose the following assumptions. First, we will argue that the relative clause is right-adjoined to a head N and a relative operator OP moves from the base position through [Spec, TP] to [Spec, CP]. Second, we will suggest that C transfers its φ-feature to T, stranding its wh-feature on C under the C-T inheritance system in Chomsky (2008). Third, we will assume that the relative operator carries its φ-feature and wh-feature. Our analysis of relative clauses has the advantages of accounting for the following phenomena. First, we can account for the free alternation of the relative pronoun in English. Second, we can explain anti that-trace effect in relative clauses. Third, we can explain the highest subject restriction which shows that the highest subject position in the relative clause cannot be occupied by a resumptive pronoun. Finally, we can account for the free alternation of Nez Perce relative pronouns.
참고문헌 (35)
- Aoun, J., "Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The Diversity of Wh-constructions" (2003), MIT Press
- Bhatt, R., "The raising analysis of relative clauses: evidence from adjectival modification", Natural Language Semantics, 10, pp.43~90 (2002)
- Bianchi, V., "Consequences of antisymmetry: headed relative clauses" (1999), Mouton de Gruyter
- Bianchi, V., "The syntax of relative clauses", pp.53~81 (2000), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Borsley, D, "Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.629~647 (1997)
- Borsley, D., "More on the raising analysis of relative clauses", Ms, pp.2001
- Borer, H., "Restrictive relatives in modern Hebrew", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, pp.219~260 (1984)
- Bošković, Ž., "Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 45, pp.27~89 (2014)
- Bresnan, J., "Theory of complementation in English syntax", 박사, pp.1972
- Cecchetto C., "Relabeling heads. A unified account for relativization Structures", Linguistic Inquiry, 42, pp.519~560 (2011)
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection: Extensions", ms, pp.2014
- Chomsky, N., "Filters and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.425~504 (1977)
- Deal, R., "The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from selection", Syntax, 12, pp.285~323 (2009)
- Deal, R., "Cyclicity and connectivity in Nez Perce relative clauses", Linguistic Inquiry, 47, pp.427~470 (2016)
- den Dikken, M., "Phase extension: Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction", Theoretical Linguistics, 33, pp.1~41 (2007)
- Deprez, V., "Paths Towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne", pp.121~135 (1994), Georgetown University Press
- Douglas, A., "Unifying the that-trace and anti that-trace effects", ms, pp.2015
- Erlewine, Y., "Why the null complementizer is special in the English that-trace effect", ms, pp.2014
- Kayne, S., "The antisymmetry of syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kandybowicz, J., "Conditions on multiple copy spell-out and the syntax-phonology interface", Ph.D, pp.2006
- 권기양, "Notes on Labeling Algorithm", 새한영어영문학, 56(3), pp.143~162 (2014), 새한영어영문학회
- 권기양, "Notes on Subextraction and Labeling Algorithm", 언어과학, 22(3), pp.307~326 (2015), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- 권기양, "That-trace Effect and Labeling Algorithm", 영미어문학, (120), pp.127~146 (2016), 한국영미어문학회[DOI]
- McCloskey, J., "The syntax and semantics of modern Celtic languages" (1990), Academic Press
- Nunberg, G., "Idioms", pp.491~538 (1994), Language
- Perlmutter, D., "Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax" (1971), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Pesetsky, D., "Complementizer-trace effects", ms, pp.2015
- Pesetsky, D., "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.355~426 (2001), MIT Press
- Sato & Dobashi, "Prosodic Phrasing and the that-trace Effect", ms, pp.2014
- Shaheen, B., "A comparative study of restrictive relative clauses in Latakian Syrian Arabic and English and the acquisition of English restrictive relative clauses by first language speakers of Latakian Syrian Arabic", Ph. D., pp.2013
- Shlonsky, Ur, "Themes in Arabic and Hebrew syntax", pp.137~160 (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers