영어 관계구문 세부 유형의 통사-의미 접합면에서의 정치한 표상화 연구: 재구성 현상을 중심으로
The Finer-grained Interface Representations of Subtypes of Relatives in English: Focusing on Reconstruction Effects
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper classifies relatives in English into four subtypes: (ⅰ) restrictive, (ⅱ) nonrestrictive, (ⅲ) amount and (ⅳ) headless relatives, and provide finer-grained representations of them at the syntax-semantics interface. We particularly focus on reconstruction effects of relative wh-pronouns and head nouns in the different subtypes of relatives and investigate how /why they are structured as they should be at the interface. We take a hybrid approach to these subtypes of relatives, adopting both relative wh- pronoun and relative head noun movement hypotheses. The up-shot of the discussion in this paper is that what is reconstructed in the relative clause and its edge differs across the subtypes of relatives. In restrictive relatives either relative wh-pronoun or relative head noun is reconstructed, whereas in nonrestrictive relatives only relative wh-pronoun is. In degree relatives only relative head noun is reconstructed, but in headless relatives relative wh-pronoun is reconstructed.
Abstract
This paper classifies relatives in English into four subtypes: (ⅰ) restrictive, (ⅱ) nonrestrictive, (ⅲ) amount and (ⅳ) headless relatives, and provide finer-grained representations of them at the syntax-semantics interface. We particularly focus on reconstruction effects of relative wh-pronouns and head nouns in the different subtypes of relatives and investigate how /why they are structured as they should be at the interface. We take a hybrid approach to these subtypes of relatives, adopting both relative wh- pronoun and relative head noun movement hypotheses. The up-shot of the discussion in this paper is that what is reconstructed in the relative clause and its edge differs across the subtypes of relatives. In restrictive relatives either relative wh-pronoun or relative head noun is reconstructed, whereas in nonrestrictive relatives only relative wh-pronoun is. In degree relatives only relative head noun is reconstructed, but in headless relatives relative wh-pronoun is reconstructed.
참고문헌 (51)
- Bhatt, Rajesh, "The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: Evidence from Adjectival Modification", Natural Language Semantics, 10, pp.43~90 (2002)
- Bhatt, Rajesh, "Adjectival Modifiers and the Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses", NELS, 30, pp.55~67 (2000)
- Bianchi, Valentina, "Consequences of Antisymmetry for the Syntax of Headed Relative Clauses", 박사, pp.1995
- Bonneau, José, "The Structure of Internally Headed Relative Clauses", 박사, pp.1992
- Borsely, Robert, "Relative Clauses and the Theory of Phrase Structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.629~647 (1997)
- Borsely, Robert, "More on the Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses", pp.2001
- Brame, Michael, "A New Analysis of the Relative Clause: Evidence for an Interpretive Theory", pp.1968
- Bresnan, Joan, "The Syntax of Free Relatives in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 9, pp.331~391 (1978)
- Browning, Maggie, "Null Operator Constructions", 박사, pp.1987
- Carlson, Greg, "Amount Relative", Language, 53, pp.520~542 (1997)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "On Wh-Movement. in: Formal Syntax" (1977), Academic Press
- Citko, Barbara, "Deletion under Identity in Relative Clauses", NELS, 31, pp.131~145 (2001)
- Cole, Peter, "The Structure of Internally Headed Relative Clauses", Natural Language and Linguistics Theory, 5, pp.277~302 (1987)
- Culy, Christopher, "The Syntax and Semantics of IHRCs", 박사, pp.1990
- de Vries, Mark, "The Syntax of Relativization", 박사, pp.2002
- Delorme, Evelyne, "Appositive NP Constructions", Foundations of Language, 8, pp.2~29 (1972)
- Doron, Edit, "The Discourse Function of Appositives", Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics and of the Workshop on Discourse, pp.53~62 (1994), Hebrew University
- Edmonds, Joseph, "Appositive Relatives Have No Properties", Linguistic Inquiry, 10, pp.211~243 (1979)
- Grosu, Alexander, "Type Resolution in Relative Constructions. Feature Marking and Dependency Encoding. in: The Syntax of Relative Clauses", pp.83~120 (2000), John Benjamins
- Grosu, Alexander, "Type Resolution in Relative Constructions: Competing Restrictive and Maximalizing Constructions. in: Interface Strategies", pp.127~152 (2000), Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
- Grosu, Alexander, "Strange Relatives at the Interface of Two Millennia", Glot International, 6, pp.145~167 (2002)
- Grosu, Alexander, "Strange Relatives of the Third Kind", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.125~170 (1998)
- Halitsky, David, "Deep Structure Appositive and Complement NPs", Language, 50, pp.446~455 (1974)
- Heim, Irene, "Where Does the Definiteness Restriction Apply?. in: The Representation of (In)Definiteness", pp.21~42 (1987), MIT Press
- Ito, Junko, "Head-movement at LF and PF: The Syntax of Head-internal Relatives in Japanese", University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 11 (1986)
- Jackendoff, Ray, "X-Bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure" (1977), MIT Press
- Jacobson, Pauline, "On the Quantificational Force of English Free Relatives. in: Quantification in Natural Language 2", pp.451~486 (1995), Kluwer
- Kayne, Richard, "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kennedy, Christopher, "Comparative and Relative Clauses Compared", MIT Ling Lunch, 3 (2002)
- Klein, Maarten, "Appositionele NP’s in het Nederlands", De Nieuwe Taalgids, 69, pp.139~153 (1976)
- Klein, Maarten, "Appositionele constructies in het Nederlands", 박사, pp.1977
- Lebeaux, David, "Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar", 박사, pp.1988
- Lees, Robert, "The Grammar of English Nominalizations" (1960), Mouton
- Lees, Robert, "Grammatical Analysis of the English Comparative Construction", Word, 17, pp.171~185 (1961)
- Munn, Alan, "A Minimalist Account of Reconstruction Asymmetries", NELS, 24, pp.397~410 (1994)
- Platzack, Christopher, "Complement-of-N0 Account of Restrictive and Non- restrictive Relatives: the Case of Swedish. in: The Syntax of Relative Causes", pp.265~308 (2000), John Benjamins
- Ross, John R, "Constraints on Variables in Syntax", 박사, pp.1967
- Rullmann, Hotze, "Maximality in the Semantics of Wh-constructions", 박사, pp.1995
- Safir, Ken, "Relative Clauses in a Theory of Binding and Levels", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.663~689 (1986)
- Safir, Ken, "Reconstruction and Bound Anaphora: Copy Theory without Deletion at LF", 석사, pp.1998
- Safir, Ken, "Vehicle Change and Reconstruction in A'-chains", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.587~620 (1999)
- Sauerland, Uli, "The Meaning of Chains", 박사, pp.1998
- Sauerland, Uli, "Two Structures for English Restrictive Relative Clauses", Proceedings of the Nanzan GLOW, pp.351~366 (2000)
- Schachter, Paul, "Focus and Relativization", Language, 49, pp.19~46 (1973)
- Schmitt, Christina, "Some Consequences of the Complement Analysis for Relative Clauses, Demonstratives and Wrong Adjectives. in: The Syntax of Relative Clauses", pp.83~120 (2000), John Benjamins
- Smith, Carlota, "Determiners and Relative Clauses in a Generative Grammar of English. in: Modern Studies in English", pp.247~263 (1969), Prentice-Hall
- Stuurman, Frits, "Appositives and X-Bar theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 14, pp.736~744 (1983)
- Thompson, Sandra A, "The Deep Structure of Relative Clauses. in: Studies in Linguistic Semantics", pp.78~94 (1971), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Vergnard, R, "French Relative Clauses", 박사, pp.1985
- Zwart, Jan-Wouter, "A Head Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses in Dutch. in: The Syntax of Relative Clauses", pp.349~385 (2000), John Benjamins