본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Flap Morphology and Predictability by WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria Microkeratome: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류안과학

초록

Purpose: To evaluate laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap thickness predictability and morphology by femtosecond(FS) laser and microkeratome (MK) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Methods: Fifty-two candidates for the LASIK procedure were stratified into two groups: FS laser-assisted (AllegrettoFS-200) and MK flap creation (Moria 2). Flap thickness was determined at five points. The side-cutangle was measured in three directions at the margin interface. LASIK flap assessment was performed onemonth postoperatively by Spectralis anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Results: Fifty-two patients (93 eyes) were recruited; 49 eyes were stratified to the FS group and 44 eyes to theMK group. The FS group had relatively even flap configurations, and the MK group had meniscus-shapedflaps. Mean differences between planned and actual flap thickness were 12.93 ± 8.89 and 19.91 ± 5.77 μm inthe FS and MK groups, respectively. In thin flaps (100 to 110 μm), there was a significant disparity between thetwo groups (7.80 ± 4.71 and 19.44 ± 4.46 μm in the FS and MK groups, respectively). However, in thicker flaps(130 μm), comparable flap thickness disparity was achieved (18.54 ± 9.52 and 20.83 ± 5.99 μm in the FS andMK groups, respectively). Mean side-cut angle was 74.29 ± 5.79 degrees and 32.34 ± 4.94 degrees in the FSand MK groups, respectively. Conclusions: Comparable flap thickness predictability was achieved in thicker flaps (130 μm), while the FS lasertechnique yielded a more predictable result in thinner flaps (100 to 110 μm). Different flap morphology wasobserved in meniscus flaps in MK-LASIK and flap morphology in FS-LASIK.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap thickness predictability and morphology by femtosecond(FS) laser and microkeratome (MK) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Methods: Fifty-two candidates for the LASIK procedure were stratified into two groups: FS laser-assisted (AllegrettoFS-200) and MK flap creation (Moria 2). Flap thickness was determined at five points. The side-cutangle was measured in three directions at the margin interface. LASIK flap assessment was performed onemonth postoperatively by Spectralis anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Results: Fifty-two patients (93 eyes) were recruited; 49 eyes were stratified to the FS group and 44 eyes to theMK group. The FS group had relatively even flap configurations, and the MK group had meniscus-shapedflaps. Mean differences between planned and actual flap thickness were 12.93 ± 8.89 and 19.91 ± 5.77 μm inthe FS and MK groups, respectively. In thin flaps (100 to 110 μm), there was a significant disparity between thetwo groups (7.80 ± 4.71 and 19.44 ± 4.46 μm in the FS and MK groups, respectively). However, in thicker flaps(130 μm), comparable flap thickness disparity was achieved (18.54 ± 9.52 and 20.83 ± 5.99 μm in the FS andMK groups, respectively). Mean side-cut angle was 74.29 ± 5.79 degrees and 32.34 ± 4.94 degrees in the FSand MK groups, respectively. Conclusions: Comparable flap thickness predictability was achieved in thicker flaps (130 μm), while the FS lasertechnique yielded a more predictable result in thinner flaps (100 to 110 μm). Different flap morphology wasobserved in meniscus flaps in MK-LASIK and flap morphology in FS-LASIK.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Sugar A, "Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism : safety and efficacy : a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology", Ophthalmology, 109, pp.175~187 (2002)
  2. Pietila J, "Corneal flap measurements in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Moria M2 automated microkeratome", J Refract Surg, 21, pp.377~385 (2005)
  3. Knorz MC, "Flap and interface complications in LASIK", Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 13, pp.242~245 (2002)
  4. Ambrosio R Jr, "Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis : etiology, prevention, and treatment", J Refract Surg, 17, pp.350~379 (2001)
  5. Kurtz RM, "Photodisruption in the human cornea as a function of laser pulse width", J Refract Surg, 13, pp.653~658 (1997)
  6. Salomao MQ, "Femtosecond laser in laser in situ keratomileusis", J Cataract Refract Surg, 36, pp.1024~1032 (2010)
  7. Muallem MS, "Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement", J Cataract Refract Surg, 30, pp.2295~2302 (2004)
  8. Cheng HC, "Errors of residual stromal thickness estimation in LASIK", Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging, 39, pp.107~113 (2008)
  9. Grewal DS, "Assessment of central corneal thickness in normal, keratoconus, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes using Scheimpflug imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound pachymetry", J Cataract Refract Surg, 36, pp.954~964 (2010)
  10. Ahn H, "Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 3 femtosecond lasers and a microkeratome", J Cataract Refract Surg, 37, pp.349~357 (2011)
  11. Schneider CA, "NIH Image to ImageJ : 25 years of image analysis", Nat Methods, 9, pp.671~675 (2012)
  12. Prospero Ponce CM, "Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes", J Cataract Refract Surg, 35, pp.1055~1062 (2009)
  13. Pajic B, "Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK : a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study", Clin Ophthalmol, 8, pp.1883~1889 (2014)
  14. Zhang XX, "Corneal flap morphological analysis using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond lasers versus mechanical microkeratome", Int J Ophthalmol, 5, pp.69~73 (2012)
  15. Zhang Y, "Comparison of corneal flap morphology using AS-OCT in LASIK with the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome", J Refract Surg, 29, pp.320~324 (2013)
  16. Zhou Y, "Comparison of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser and Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome", J Refract Surg, 28, pp.189~194 (2012)
  17. Liu Q, "Comparison of corneal flaps created by Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers", Int J Ophthalmol, 9, pp.1006~1010 (2016)
  18. von Jagow B, "Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography", J Cataract Refract Surg, 35, pp.35~41 (2009)
  19. Zheng Y, "Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 2 femtosecond lasers", Cornea, 34, pp.328~333 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)