도로점거시위에 대한 형사법적 관점의 고찰
A study on assembly obstructing roads from a criminal law perspectives
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Passive, defensive and non-violent assembly obstructing roads be viewed from a standpoint securing assembly right instead of regulating assembly, considering the binding authority of fundamental right of demonstration guaranteed in constitution. Law enforcement agencies should not apply the obstructing traffic crime without considering the condition of obstructing roads during assembly. Because criminal punishment should be the last resort to regulate demonstration and assembly after requesting to stop assembly, dispersal order and direct dispersal by police officers. In other words, it is desirable to apply the demonstration and assembly law and traffic law which have provisions to secure traffic order. Therefore, obstructing traffic crime should be applied strictly in case of departing of the scope of right of demonstration in Constitution, such as destroying roads, establishing obstacles which can not be removed easily and restricting traffic by considerable. “obstructing” and “other methods” which are elements of obstructing traffic crime in Korean Criminal Law should be revised to guarantee the principle of clearness so that to get rid of controversy over violating the clearness principle in Nulla poena sine lege. Also, criminal law concerning assembly obstructing traffic should be functioned properly and on time as a method to solve social confliction and a last resort to solve problems. So, it is required that criminal law standpoints against peaceful,not-violent assembly obstructing roads be converted. First, theory of joint-principal through conspiracy should be excluded from a standpoint to secure the right of demonstration. Second, minor crimes of assembly obstructing traffic should be decriminalized. Third, it is necessary to permit compulsory identification power by police in stop and search to guarantee the effectiveness of decriminalization involving minor crimes violating demonstration and assembly right.
Abstract
Passive, defensive and non-violent assembly obstructing roads be viewed from a standpoint securing assembly right instead of regulating assembly, considering the binding authority of fundamental right of demonstration guaranteed in constitution. Law enforcement agencies should not apply the obstructing traffic crime without considering the condition of obstructing roads during assembly. Because criminal punishment should be the last resort to regulate demonstration and assembly after requesting to stop assembly, dispersal order and direct dispersal by police officers. In other words, it is desirable to apply the demonstration and assembly law and traffic law which have provisions to secure traffic order. Therefore, obstructing traffic crime should be applied strictly in case of departing of the scope of right of demonstration in Constitution, such as destroying roads, establishing obstacles which can not be removed easily and restricting traffic by considerable. “obstructing” and “other methods” which are elements of obstructing traffic crime in Korean Criminal Law should be revised to guarantee the principle of clearness so that to get rid of controversy over violating the clearness principle in Nulla poena sine lege. Also, criminal law concerning assembly obstructing traffic should be functioned properly and on time as a method to solve social confliction and a last resort to solve problems. So, it is required that criminal law standpoints against peaceful,not-violent assembly obstructing roads be converted. First, theory of joint-principal through conspiracy should be excluded from a standpoint to secure the right of demonstration. Second, minor crimes of assembly obstructing traffic should be decriminalized. Third, it is necessary to permit compulsory identification power by police in stop and search to guarantee the effectiveness of decriminalization involving minor crimes violating demonstration and assembly right.
참고문헌 (39)
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2010), 박영사
- 유기천, "형법학 각론강의 하" (1990), 일조각
- 이재상, "형법각론 제7판" (2011), 박영사
- 이정원, "형법각론" (1999), 법지사
- 임웅, "형법각론" (2011), 법문사
- 정성근, "형법각론" (2011), 삼영사
- 김연태, "행정법 Ⅱ(제12판)" (2008), 법문사
- 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" (2008), 박영사
- 金昌君, "非犯罪化政策에 관한 理論的 硏究", 박사, pp.1992
- 집회 및 시위에 관한 법률의 개정방향에 관한 연구, "서정범", 치안정책연구소, ~ (2009)
- 원혜욱, "형사법개정연구(Ⅳ) 형법각칙 개정안" (2009), 형사법개정연구회
- 이헌섭, "형법각칙(5), 주석형법 제3판" (2006), 로앤비
- 이근우, "행정형법의 재구성 : 개념, 구조, 절차", 박사, 법학과, pp.2008
- 윤성철, "集會·示威에 대한 刑事法的 硏究", 박사, pp.2012
- 법무부, "형사법제과, In 독일형법" (2008), 법무부
- 법무부, "질서위반행위규제법 해설", ~ (2008)
- 법무부, "형법개정요강 소위원회 심의결과", 형사법개정자료(Ⅷ) (1989)
- 권정순, "집회·시위 참가자에 대한 검찰 및 법원의 대응과 문제점", 집회와 시위의 자유」토론회 자료집 (2010), 인권연대·연세대 공공거버넌스와 법센타
- 김택수, "불심검문의 실효성 확보와 인권보호의 조화방안", 경찰법연구, 6(2), pp.160~190 (2008), 한국경찰법학회
- 05, 최신독일판례연구, "공용도로에서의 연좌시위와 집회의 자유-BVerfG, Beschluss vom 7. 3. 2011 - 1 BvR 388", pp.2011, 박희영
- 신동욱, "공모공동정범에 관한 약간의 고찰", 고시연구 (1975)
- 신은영, "집회․시위에 대한 형법 제185조 (일반교통방해죄) 적용의 문제점", 안암법학, (37), pp.297~329 (2012), 안암법학회
- 이성용, "집시법상의 복면시위 금지", 한국경찰연구, 7(2), pp.93~120 (2008), 한국경찰연구학회
- 이성용, "불심검문 개정논의에 관한 소고", 경찰학연구, 10(3), pp.3~30 (2010), 경찰대학
- 이형국, "공모공동정범에 있어서 공범자의 정범성, In 지송 이재상교수 화갑기념논문집" (2004)
- 이호중, "미신고집회의 금지와 처벌에 대한 형사법적 고찰", 민주법학, (46), pp.191~236 (2011), 민주주의법학연구회
- 이희훈, "구 집회 및 시위에 관한 법률상 집회의 개념과 사전신고 및 미신고 집회시 형벌 규정에 대한 헌법적 평가 -헌법재판소 2009. 5. 28, 2007헌바22결정에 대한 비판을 중심으로-", 중앙법학, 11(3), pp.81~105 (2009), 중앙법학회
- 정승환, "형사소송법의 체포제도에 대한 재검토 - 형사소송법 개정안의 인신구속제도와 관련하여-", 법조, 54(7), pp.51~86 (2005), 법조협회
- 최호진, "기능적 행위지배와 공모공동정범", 법학논고, (32), pp.631~655 (2010), 법학연구원
- 하태훈, "기능적 범행의 지배", 형사판례연구, (12) (2004)
- 하태훈, "법치국가에서 공권력의 사명과 그 현실", 집회와 시위의 자유 토론회 자료집 (2010), 인권연대·연세대 공공거버넌스와 법센터
- 하태훈, "일반교통방해죄의 위헌성 및 해석론, 야간집회 금지 헌법불합치 결정이 남긴 법적과제", 서강대학교 법학연구소 연세대 법학연구원 공공거버넌스와 법센터 공동주최 학술대회 (2009)
- 하태훈, "형법 제185조의 법리적 문제점 및 올바른 개정방향", 집회시위의 자유와 일반교통방해죄의 개정방향 (2011)
- 한인섭, "일반교통방해죄와 집회시위에의 그 적용을 둘러싼 문제", 형사법연구, 21(1), pp.353~374 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- Dietel·Gintzel·Kniesel, "Gesetz über Versammlungen und Aufzüge Kommentar 16. Auflage" (2011), Carl Haymanns Verlag
- Höfling, "in: Grundgesetz-Kommentar" (1996), Sachs(Hrsg.)
- Roos, "Entkriminalisierungstendenzen im Besonderen Teil des Strafrecht, Franfurt am Mein" (1981)
- Trändle·Fischer, "Strafgesetzbuch, 52. Auflage" (2004)
- Ulich Bochner, "Demonstrationsdelikte aus strafrechtlicher Sicht, Versammlungen, Polizei und Sicherheitmanagement Band 1" (2006), LIT Verlag Hamburg