집회·시위 현장에서의 경미한 법위반자에 대한 형사사법처리절차
A study on the Criminal Procedures for minor Criminals in Assembly and Demonstration Places
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The assembly and demonstrations are the typical situations to express social confliction. Criminal law is the most effective control tool to preserve public order in social confliction circumstances. But, criminal law should be applied prudently because it has forceful punishments to deprive and limit one’s freedom and rights. Especially, When arresting the criminals who has been caught in the act of committing an offence in assembly and demonstration places, the ‘necessity test of arrest’ should be done except apprehension of escape and destruction of evidence. If possible, in case of criminals identified, it is desirable to attend police department afterward or to deal the case in a voluntary attendance manner. And, Summary justice procedure be used positively to deal with minor criminals in assembly and demonstration places. Because it prevent criminals who are almost prisoner of conscience from the stigma effect by criminal record. Also, in case of minor criminals who have been arrested in unlawful assembly places and have no interests to be punished, it is required to introduce rapid procedure to deal the case. The power of Police chief to dismiss the case with a caution should be used properly to release the criminal from burden of time and spirit through rapid procedure. It will also contribute to reduce of workload. The police chief’s power to dismiss the case with a caution is very useful in practice because it has been recognized in the interpretation of law and case. It is the human right based system to prevent stigma effect and release defendants rapidly from criminal procedure through rapid procedure. To guarantee its effectiveness, the power to dismiss a case with a caution be defined in summary justice act.
Abstract
The assembly and demonstrations are the typical situations to express social confliction. Criminal law is the most effective control tool to preserve public order in social confliction circumstances. But, criminal law should be applied prudently because it has forceful punishments to deprive and limit one’s freedom and rights. Especially, When arresting the criminals who has been caught in the act of committing an offence in assembly and demonstration places, the ‘necessity test of arrest’ should be done except apprehension of escape and destruction of evidence. If possible, in case of criminals identified, it is desirable to attend police department afterward or to deal the case in a voluntary attendance manner. And, Summary justice procedure be used positively to deal with minor criminals in assembly and demonstration places. Because it prevent criminals who are almost prisoner of conscience from the stigma effect by criminal record. Also, in case of minor criminals who have been arrested in unlawful assembly places and have no interests to be punished, it is required to introduce rapid procedure to deal the case. The power of Police chief to dismiss the case with a caution should be used properly to release the criminal from burden of time and spirit through rapid procedure. It will also contribute to reduce of workload. The police chief’s power to dismiss the case with a caution is very useful in practice because it has been recognized in the interpretation of law and case. It is the human right based system to prevent stigma effect and release defendants rapidly from criminal procedure through rapid procedure. To guarantee its effectiveness, the power to dismiss a case with a caution be defined in summary justice act.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김종구, "형사사법개혁론" (2002), 법문사
- 배종대, "신형사소송법 제3판" (2011), 홍문사
- 백형구, "(알기쉬운)형사소송법" (2007), 박영사
- 신양균, "형사소송법" (2009), 화산미디어
- 신동운, "신형사소송법" (2008), 법문사
- 신현주, "형사소송법" (2002), 박영사
- 손동권, "형사소송법 개정신판" (2010), 세창출판사
- 이은모, "형사소송법" (2011), 박영사
- 이재상, "신형사소송법" (2008), 박영사
- 정승호, "경찰방범론" (1995), 경찰대학
- 차용석, "형사소송법" (2008), 21세기사
- 김용우, "즉결심판제도에서의 신속성과 절차적 보장문제", 형사정책, 13(1) (2001), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김태명, "일본의 미죄처분과 간이송치제도", 제45차 한국경찰법학회 학술대회 제1주제 발표문 (2011), 한국경찰법학회
- 문성도, "파출소장 훈방권의 법적근거", 경찰대학 논문집, 15 (1995)
- 집회・시위에 대한 경찰대응 기준과 개선방안, "박경래", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2009)
- 신동운, "수사지휘권의 귀속에 관한 연혁적 고찰(Ⅰ)", 서울대학교 법학, (1) (2001)
- 이돈일, "일본의 즉결심판제도", 치안정책연구 (1998)
- 이동희, "경미범죄의 효율적 처리방안- 일본의 경미범죄 처리제도의 비교법적 시사점을 중심으로-", 형사정책, 15(2), pp.6~384 (2003), 한국형사정책학회
- 이창무, "국내·외 집회·시위 및 경찰 관리방식의 변천과정 연구", 치안논총, 23 (2007)
- 임웅, "경미범죄의 비범죄화", 형사정책연구 (1990)
- 조국, "경찰 ‘훈방권’의 법적 근거와 한계", 한국경찰법연구, (창간) (2003)
- 한영수, "즉결심판제도에 대한 비판적 고찰", 형사정책연구, 9(2) (1998)
- 방범경찰(간부후보생과정), "경찰종합학교", ~ (1994)
- 경찰청, "집회시위현장 법집행 매뉴얼" (2008)
- "대검형일 23100-1592 「즉결심판청구 사건범위에 따른 지시」, 1988. 7. 20", ~ (1988)
- 치안연구소 제도개선기획단, "일본경찰 연구자료집(기본자료편)", ~ (1998)
- Weigärtner, Dieter, "Demonstration und Strafrecht, Max-Planck-Inst" (1986), für Ausländ. u. Internat
- Kaiser, Günther, "Kriminalisierung und Entkriminalisierung in Strafrecht und Kriminalpolitik" (1983), FS für Ulrich Klug
