집단표시에 의한 모욕죄의 성립논리에 대한 검토 - 집단표시에 의한 모욕의 개인귀속과정에 대한 분석 -
A Study on the Logic to Constitute Insult by Group Description
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Our Criminal Law prescribes "Insult" in Article 311 that "A person who publicly insults another shall be punished by imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not more than one year or by a fine not exceeding two million won". So, at issue lately, the "Group-Insult" is an inaccurate term. To understand it correctly, the so-called "Group-Insult" term need to draw a distinction between two different senses, such as (1) an insult "on a group itself",(2) an insult "by expressing and displaying a group's name". the former is not allowed under current criminal law, because a group can not be a main agent of the honor as interests protected by law, while the latter means the insult not "for a group itself" but "for a component part(member) of a group". the last case of insult to woman announcers and to National Assembly members have relevance to the latter sense. In reference to the case of insult to woman announcers, the trial court and appeals trial court plead guilty to constitute insult crime(Article 311) by group description, on the authority of the "principle of dilution"and "possibility of reminiscent". This two principles cast a long shadow to vast an insult on a group in its component members. In the Criminal Law, this logic process is closely connected with problem of the victim's specification.
Abstract
Our Criminal Law prescribes "Insult" in Article 311 that "A person who publicly insults another shall be punished by imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not more than one year or by a fine not exceeding two million won". So, at issue lately, the "Group-Insult" is an inaccurate term. To understand it correctly, the so-called "Group-Insult" term need to draw a distinction between two different senses, such as (1) an insult "on a group itself",(2) an insult "by expressing and displaying a group's name". the former is not allowed under current criminal law, because a group can not be a main agent of the honor as interests protected by law, while the latter means the insult not "for a group itself" but "for a component part(member) of a group". the last case of insult to woman announcers and to National Assembly members have relevance to the latter sense. In reference to the case of insult to woman announcers, the trial court and appeals trial court plead guilty to constitute insult crime(Article 311) by group description, on the authority of the "principle of dilution"and "possibility of reminiscent". This two principles cast a long shadow to vast an insult on a group in its component members. In the Criminal Law, this logic process is closely connected with problem of the victim's specification.
참고문헌 (11)
- 강구진, "형법강의 각론Ⅰ", pp.211~ (1983)
- 이형국, "형법각론연구Ⅰ", pp.301~ (1997)
- 이재상, "형법각론(제7판)" (2010)
- 김상호, "형법상 모욕과 비방", 저스티스, (103), pp.52~71 (2008), 한국법학원
- 김성돈, "형법각론(제2판)", pp.202~, 2009
- 도중진, "명예에 관한 죄의 정비방안", 형사법연구, (22), pp.741~ (2004)
- 박경신, "모욕죄의 위헌성과 친고죄 조항의 폐지에 대한 정책적 고찰", 고려법학, (52), pp.263~299 (2009), 법학연구원
- 유기천, "형법각론(상)", pp.138~ (1982)
- 이정원, "명예에 관한 죄에서의 명예개념과 구성요건의 체계", 경남법학, 13, pp.87~ (1997)
- 이진국, "사실적시와 가치판단의 한계사례", 비교형사법연구, 5(1), pp.10~264 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 황태정, "인터넷상 명예훼손·모욕죄와 피해자의 특정", 형사법연구, 21(3), pp.317~338 (2009), 한국형사법학회
