본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

다양한 형태의 등비급수 과제들에 대한 학생들의생각과 표현에 관한 사례연구

A case study on student's thoughts and expressions on various types of geometric series tasks

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study started with the following questions. Suppose that students do not accept various forms of geometric series tasks as the same task. Also, let's say that the approach was different for each task. Then, when they realize that they are the same task, how will students connect the different approaches? This study is a process of pro-actively confirming whether or not such a question can be made. For this purpose, three students in the second grade of high school participated in the teaching experiment. The results of this study are as follows. It also confirmed how the students think about the various types of tasks in the geometric series. For example, students have stated that the value is 1 in a series type of task. However, in the case of the 0.999... type of task, the value is expressed as less than 1. At this time, we examined only mathematical expressions of students approaching each task. The problem of reachability was not encountered because the task represented by the series symbol approaches the problem solved by procedural calculation. However, in the 0.999... type of task, a variety of expressions were observed that revealed problems with reachability. The analysis of students' expressions related to geometric series can provide important information for infinite concepts and limit conceptual research. The problems of this study may be discussed through related studies. Perhaps more advanced research may be based on the results of this study. Through these discussions, I expect that the contents of infinity in the school field will not be forced unilaterally because there is no mathematical error, but it will be an opportunity for students to think about the learning method in a natural way.

Abstract

This study started with the following questions. Suppose that students do not accept various forms of geometric series tasks as the same task. Also, let's say that the approach was different for each task. Then, when they realize that they are the same task, how will students connect the different approaches? This study is a process of pro-actively confirming whether or not such a question can be made. For this purpose, three students in the second grade of high school participated in the teaching experiment. The results of this study are as follows. It also confirmed how the students think about the various types of tasks in the geometric series. For example, students have stated that the value is 1 in a series type of task. However, in the case of the 0.999... type of task, the value is expressed as less than 1. At this time, we examined only mathematical expressions of students approaching each task. The problem of reachability was not encountered because the task represented by the series symbol approaches the problem solved by procedural calculation. However, in the 0.999... type of task, a variety of expressions were observed that revealed problems with reachability. The analysis of students' expressions related to geometric series can provide important information for infinite concepts and limit conceptual research. The problems of this study may be discussed through related studies. Perhaps more advanced research may be based on the results of this study. Through these discussions, I expect that the contents of infinity in the school field will not be forced unilaterally because there is no mathematical error, but it will be an opportunity for students to think about the learning method in a natural way.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 강미광, "무한 개념의 지도방안과 활용 예제 - 중학교 교육과정을 중심으로 -", 수학교육, 47(4), pp.447~465 (2008), 한국수학교육학회
  2. "교육과학기술부", 2011
  3. "교육부", 2015
  4. 마민영, "중학생들의 일차함수에 대한 이해와 발달", 박사, pp.2017
  5. 박선용, "극한과 무한집합의 상호작용과 그 교육적 시사점에 대한 역사적 연구", 한국수학사학회지, 31(2), pp.73~91 (2018), 한국수학사학회[DOI]
  6. 박선화, "무한 개념의 이해", 대한수학교육학회논문집, 3(2), pp.159~171 (1993)
  7. 박선화, "수열의 극한 개념에 대한 인지적 장애의극복 방안 연구", 수학교육학연구, 10(2), pp.247~262 (2000)
  8. 박임숙, "고등학교에서 수열의 극한 개념의 지도에 관한 소고", 수학교육논문집, 13(1), pp.287~304 (2002)
  9. 신보미, "고등학생들의 정적분 개념 이해", 학교수학, 11(1), pp.93~110 (2009), 대한수학교육학회
  10. 우정호, "수학학습-지도원리와 방법" (2001), 서울대학교출판부
  11. 이동근, "고등학교 1학년 학생들의 시간, 속력, 거리의 관계에서 평균속력에 대한 인식과 평균속력 함수 구성에 대한 연구", 박사, pp.2017
  12. 이동근, "지수함수 형태의 거리함수에서 미분계수의 절차적 지식 구성과 표현의 변화에 대한 사례연구", 학교수학, 19(4), pp.639~661 (2017), 대한수학교육학회
  13. 이동근, "구간에서의 변화율에 대한 인식과 표현에 대한 연구", 수학교육학연구, 27(1), pp.1~22 (2017), 대한수학교육학회
  14. 이승우, "무한 등비급수의 합에 대한 Archimedes의 아이디어의 은유적 모델과 그 교육적 활용", 학교수학, 18(1), pp.215~229 (2016), 대한수학교육학회
  15. 이지현, "예비교사들은 0.99…<1라는 주장을 어떻게 반박하는가?", 학교수학, 16(3), pp.491~502 (2014), 대한수학교육학회
  16. 전명남, "무한 개념이해 수준의 발달과 반성적 추상", 수학교육, 42(3) (2003), 한국수학교육학회
  17. 조한혁, "정적 동적 관점에서의 순환소수", 학교수학, 1(2), pp.605~615 (1999)
  18. 홍진곤, "무한 개념의 이해에 관하여", 수학교육학연구, 18(4), pp.469~482 (2008), 대한수학교육학회
  19. Buchholtz, N., "Future mathematics teachers’ professional knowledge of elementary mathematics from an advanced standpoint", ZDM, 45(1), pp.107~120 (2013)
  20. Glasersfeld, E., "급진적 구성주의" (1999), 원미사
  21. King, D. A., "A History of Infinite Series", Doctoral, pp.1968
  22. Knopp, K., "Infinite sequences and series" (1956), Dover Publications
  23. Randolph, J. F., "Insights into Modern Mathematics", pp.200~240 (1957), NCTM
  24. Steffe, L. P., "Theories of mathematical learning", pp.477~498 (1996), Erlbaum

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)