증명에서 경험적 관점의 한계에 대한 중학교 3학년 학생들의 이해 연구
A study on the understanding of limitations of experiential viewpoints for 9th grade students
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The mathematical object is conceptual. Thus we can not prove the property of mathematical object in experimental viewpoint but in conceptual viewpoint. We performed the experiment for 28 middle school students to investigate whether they understand this. As a result, the majority of student didn't cognize the limit of experimental method. We had also individual interviews with four students. As results, one student was exactly cognizing the limit of experimental method, but he couldn't prove logically. The others didn't cognize the limit of experimental method. They thought that the proposition was already true regardless of the error. And one of them even thought that to be equal approximately was the same of to be equal exactly. Also, one student has confused between the experimental viewpoint and the conceptual viewpoint. This implies that it is necessary to help students understand the limit of experimental method.
Abstract
The mathematical object is conceptual. Thus we can not prove the property of mathematical object in experimental viewpoint but in conceptual viewpoint. We performed the experiment for 28 middle school students to investigate whether they understand this. As a result, the majority of student didn't cognize the limit of experimental method. We had also individual interviews with four students. As results, one student was exactly cognizing the limit of experimental method, but he couldn't prove logically. The others didn't cognize the limit of experimental method. They thought that the proposition was already true regardless of the error. And one of them even thought that to be equal approximately was the same of to be equal exactly. Also, one student has confused between the experimental viewpoint and the conceptual viewpoint. This implies that it is necessary to help students understand the limit of experimental method.
참고문헌 (21)
- 교육과학기술부, "초등학교 수학 4-1" (2010), 두산동아
- 교육과학기술부, "초등학교 수학 4-2" (2010), 두산동아
- , 2011
- 김부윤, "수학 교실에서 나타나는 극단적 교수 현상에 대한 고찰", 수학교육 논문집, 21(3), pp.407~430 (2007), 한국수학교육학회
- 김양희, "기하 증명 과정에서 발생하는 오류 분석 : 중학교 8-나 도형의 성질을 중심으로", 석사, 수학교육, pp.2008
- 나귀수, "수학 영재 학생들의 발견과 증명에 대한 연구", 수학교육학연구, 21(2), pp.105~120 (2011), 대한수학교육학회
- 류성림, "전형식적 증명의 의의와 교수학적 의의에관한 연구", 대한수학교육학회 논문집, 8(1), pp.313~326 (1998)
- 류성림, "중학생의 기하 증명 능력과 오류에 대한 연구", 수학교육, 32(2), pp.137~149 (1993)
- 이준열, "중학교 수학 2" (2009), 천재교육
- 이호철, "중학교 기하 증명과정에서 학생들이 보이는 오류분석 : 8-나의 사각형의 성질 중심으로", 석사, 수학교육, pp.2007
- 장혜원, "數學 學習에서의 表現 및 表象에 관한 연구 : 表象 모델 開發을 중심으로", 박사, 수학교육, pp.1997
- 홍인선, "중학생의 기하 증명에 관한 의식과 증명 과정의 오류 경향 연구 : 제주도 중3 학생을 중심으로", 석사, 수학교육, pp.2002
- 홍진곤, "전형식적 증명의 교수학적 의미에 관한 고찰", 수학교육, 43(4), pp.381~390 (2004), 한국수학교육학회
- Balacheff, N., "Mathematics, teachers and children", pp.216~235 (1988), The Open University
- Branford, B., "A Study of Mathematical Education" (1908), Clarendon Press
- Blum, W., "Preformal Proving : Example and Reflections", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, pp.183~203 (1991)
- Fischbein, E., "The Theory of Figural Concepts", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, pp.139~162 (1993)
- Miyazaki, M., "Levels of Proof in Lower Secondary School Mathematics", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, pp.47~68 (2000)
- Semadeni, Z., "Action Proof in Primary Mathematics Teaching and in Teacher Training", For the Learning of Mathematics, 4(1), pp.32~34 (1984)
- Skemp, R. R., "수학학습심리학" (1998), 민음사
- Van Hiele, P. M., "Structure and insight – A theory of mathematics education" (1986), Academic press