고등학교 수학 학습부진학생을 위한 프로그램 개발 및 적용: ADDIE 모형 적용 사례
Development and application of the program for students with under-achievement of math in high school - On the case of ADDIE model -
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzed each process of demand analysis(A), design(D), development(D), implementation(I) and evaluation(E) of the program to support mathematics learning of students with under-achievement of math in high school. To analyze the demand, a survey was conducted on 235 high school math teachers and 334 high school students who were under-achieved in mathematics. To design and develope the program, this study linked middle school math to high school math so that the students with poor math learning could easily participate in mathematics learning. The programs developed in this study were implemented in three high schools, where separate classes were organized and run for students with poor math learning. The evaluation of the programs developed in this study was done in two ways. One was a quantitative evaluation conducted by five experts, and the other was a qualitative evaluation conducted through interviews with teachers and students participating in the program. This study found that students with poor mathematics learning were more motivated to learn, started to do mathematics, and encouraged to be confident when using learning materials that included easy problems and detailed solutions that they could solve themselves. From these results, the following three implications can be derived in developing a program to support students who are experiencing poor mathematics learning in high school. First, we should develop learning materials that link middle school mathematics to high school mathematics so that students can supplement middle school mathematics related to high school mathematics. Second, we need to develop learning materials that include detailed solutions to basic examples and include homogeneous problems that can be solved while looking at the basic example’s solution process. Third, we should avoid the challenge of asking students who are under-achieving to respond too openly.
Abstract
This study analyzed each process of demand analysis(A), design(D), development(D), implementation(I) and evaluation(E) of the program to support mathematics learning of students with under-achievement of math in high school. To analyze the demand, a survey was conducted on 235 high school math teachers and 334 high school students who were under-achieved in mathematics. To design and develope the program, this study linked middle school math to high school math so that the students with poor math learning could easily participate in mathematics learning. The programs developed in this study were implemented in three high schools, where separate classes were organized and run for students with poor math learning. The evaluation of the programs developed in this study was done in two ways. One was a quantitative evaluation conducted by five experts, and the other was a qualitative evaluation conducted through interviews with teachers and students participating in the program. This study found that students with poor mathematics learning were more motivated to learn, started to do mathematics, and encouraged to be confident when using learning materials that included easy problems and detailed solutions that they could solve themselves. From these results, the following three implications can be derived in developing a program to support students who are experiencing poor mathematics learning in high school. First, we should develop learning materials that link middle school mathematics to high school mathematics so that students can supplement middle school mathematics related to high school mathematics. Second, we need to develop learning materials that include detailed solutions to basic examples and include homogeneous problems that can be solved while looking at the basic example’s solution process. Third, we should avoid the challenge of asking students who are under-achieving to respond too openly.
참고문헌 (25)
- 고상숙, "비심리적 처치프로그램에 의한 고등학생 수학불안집단 간의 뇌파 연구", 수학교육, 55(3), pp.383~396 (2016), 한국수학교육학회
- , 2015
- 권혁진, "학습 부진아 수학 클리닉 운영 사례", 한국학교수학회논문집, 9(1), pp.19~40 (2006), 한국학교수학회
- 김동일, "학습상담" (2011), 학지사
- 김사환, "일반계 고등학생의 수학 교과에대한 기본 학습 부진 요인 분석", 수학교육논문집, 14, pp.327~348 (2002)
- 김응환, "활동중심 수업이 수학 학습부진아의 정의적 특성에 미치는 영향", 한국학교수학회논문집, 9(2), pp.209~227 (2006), 한국학교수학회
- 초․중학교 학습부진학생의 성장 과정에 대한 연구(Ⅰ), "김태은", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRI 2017-6 (2017)
- 일반고 학습부진학생 지원 방안(Ⅰ): 수학, 영어 교과를 중심으로, "노원경", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRI 2016-2 (2016)
- 일반고 학습부진학생 지원 방안(Ⅱ): 수학, 영어 교과를 중심으로, "노원경", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRI 2017-5 (2017)
- 문혜령, "GSP를 활용한 삼각함수에서 학습부진아의 수학화 과정에 관한 사례연구", 수학교육, 49(3), pp.353~373 (2010), 한국수학교육학회
- 박송이, "마인드 맵을 활용한 학습부진아의 지도가 수학학습 능력 및 태도에 미치는 영향", 한국학교수학회논문집, 12(2), pp.243~260 (2009), 한국학교수학회
- 백병부, "학습부진 극복 여부에 대한 수준별 하반 편성 및 특별보충수업의 효과", 교육사회학연구, 20(4), pp.83~110 (2010), 한국교육사회학회[DOI]
- 백순근, "학위논문 작성을 위한 교육연구 및 통계분석" (2004), 교육과학사
- 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 종단자료에 기반한 학업성취도 변화 추이 분석, "시기자", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRE 2015-1 (2015)
- 심상길, "함수 학습에 나타난 수학 학습부진아의 오류에 대한 사례 연구", 수학교육 논문집, 22(3), pp.275~288 (2008), 한국수학교육학회
- 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 분석 -수학-, "이인호", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.ORM 2016-31-3 (2016)
- 이형주, "협동학습 및 또래교수 프로그램이 수학학습부진학생의 인지적·정의적 영역에 미치는 효과 메타분석", 수학교육학연구, 25(1), pp.113~137 (2015), 대한수학교육학회
- 학습부진아 지도․지원의 실효성 제고를 위한 대안 탐색: 학습부진아 지도․지원 종합 계획(안)을 중심으로, "이화진", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRI 2009-13 (2009)
- 최계현, "상호또래교수 활동이 고등학생들의 수학교과에 대한 정의적 특성에 미치는 영향", 수학교육, 52(3), pp.423~442 (2013), 한국수학교육학회
- 허난, "예비수학교사교육에서의 플립드 러닝(Flipped Learning) 교수·학습 설계에 관한 연구", 수학교육 논문집, 29(2), pp.197~214 (2015), 한국수학교육학회
- Branch, R. M., "Instructional design : The ADDIE approach(Vol. 722)" (2009), Springer Science &Business Media
- Gustafson, K. L., "Trends and issues in instructional design and technology", pp.16~25 (2002)
- Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative research" (2005), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Seidman, I., "Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences" (2013), Teachers college press
- Waltz, C. F., "Measurement in nursing and health research" (2010), Springer publishing company