본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수학교육에서 진보주의와 구성주의 적용에 대한 성찰

Reflections on the application of progressivism and constructivism in mathematics education

신재홍|박정선
한국수학교육학회|2021.08|수학교육 (The Mathematical Education)|제60권 제3호|pp. 387-407|DOI https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2021.60.3.387

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

구성주의constructivism진보주의progressivism주관적 지식Deweysubjective knowledge

초록

본 연구는 진보주의 교육과 구성주의 교육이 학습자의 주관적 지식을 강조한다는 측면에서 공통점이 있으며, 이 두교육 사조로부터 도출된 교육 원리가 수학교육 연구와 현장에 채택되어 적용될 때 유사한 문제점 또는 부작용이 발생한다는 문제의식을 전제로 수행되었다. 주관적 지식을 강조하는 진보주의와 구성주의는 이를 교육 현장에 적용함에 있어 주관적 지식 강조의 의미, 그 목적 및 적용 방향을 분명히 할 필요가 있었다. 이 문제에 대해 먼저 과거 진보주의의 교육적 적용 방식에 대해 Dewey의 이론을 바탕으로 반성해보고, 이를 거울삼아 동일한 문제에 대한 현재 구성주의의 교육적 적용에 대해 비판적 성찰을 시도하였다. 이를 통해 구성주의에 대한 발전적 이해와 수학 교실에서 보편적이론으로 자리매김할 수 있는 논의의 단초를 제공하고자 하였다.

Abstract

The present study was conducted on the assumptions that both progressivist and constructivist education emphasized the subjective knowledge of learners and confronted similar problems when the derived educational principles from the two perspectives were adopted and applied to mathematics research and practice. We argue that progressivism and constructivism should have clarified the meaning, purpose, and direction of ‘emphasizing subjective knowledge’ in application to the particular educational field. For the issue, we reflected Dewey’s theory on the application of past progressivism, and aligned with it, we took a critical view of the educational applications of current constructivism. As a result, first, the meaning of emphasizing subjective knowledge is that each of the students constructs a unique mathematical reality based on his or her experience of situations and cognitive structures, and emphasizes our understanding of this subjective knowledge as researchers/observers. Second, the purpose of emphasizing subjective knowledge is not to emphasize subjective knowledge itself. Rather, it concerns the meaningful learning of objective knowledge: internalization of objective knowledge and objectification of subjective knowledge. Third, the application of the emphasis on subjective knowledge does not specify certain teaching/learning methods as appropriate, but orients us toward a genuine learner-centered reform from below. The introspections, we wish, will provide new momentum for discussion to establish constructivism as a coherent theory in mathematics classrooms.

참고문헌 (87)

  1. Adler, J., "The Dilemma of Transparency : Seeing and Seeing through Talk in the Mathematics Classroom", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), pp.47~64 (1999)
  2. Bang, S. O., "A study on the issues about success and failure of constructivist view of instruction", The Journal of Sciences and Arts,, S(9), pp.121~146 (2015)
  3. Cho, Y. G., "The key to linking open education", Journal of Elementary Education, 16, pp.167~196 (2000)
  4. Choi, C. W., "A case study of elementary mathematics class in a constructive view", The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 10(2), pp.229~246 (2000)
  5. 최상호, "수학화 과정에서 교사와 학생 간의 상호작용 양상과 교사의 담론 구조", 수학교육, 59(1), pp.17~29 (2020), 한국수학교육학회[DOI]
  6. Cobb, P., "Where is the mind? constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development", Educational Researcher, 23(7), pp.13~20 (1994)
  7. Cobb, P., "Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research", Educational Psychologist, 31(3), pp.175~190 (1996)
  8. Cobb, P., "Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(1), pp.3~29 (1991)
  9. Cobb, P., "A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, pp.2~33 (1992)
  10. Confrey, J., "Conceptual change analysis : implications for mathematics and curriculum", Curriculum Inquiry, 11(3), pp.243~257 (1981)
  11. Confrey, J., "Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future", pp.305~345 (2006), Sense Publications
  12. Dewey, J., "My pedagogical creed", School Journal, 54, pp.77~80 (1897)
  13. Dewey, J., "The child and the curriculum" (1902), The University Press of Chicago Press
  14. Duffy, T. M., "Handbook of research in education, communication, and technology" (1997), Macmillan
  15. Durkheim, E., "Education et sociologie" (1922), Baeyoungsa
  16. Ernest, P., "The philosophy of mathematics education" (1991), The Palmer Press
  17. Ernest, P., "Constructing mathematical knowledge:Epistemology and mathematics education", pp.68~77 (1994), The Falmer Press
  18. Ernest, P., "Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics" (1998), SUNY Press Albany
  19. Ernest, P., "What is social constructivism in the psychology of mathematics education", Proceedings of the 18th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp.304~311 (1999), University of Lisbon
  20. Ernest, P., "The psychology of learning Mathematics : The cognitive, affective and contextual domains of mathematics education" (2011), LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing
  21. Garrison, J., "Deweyan Pragmatism and the Epistemology of Contemporary Social Constructivism", American Educational Research Journal, 32(4), pp.716~740 (1995)
  22. Hackenberg, A. J., "Students’ reasoning with reversible multiplicative relationships", Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), pp.383~432 (2010)
  23. Han, M. H., "A philosophical understanding of education" (2005), Moonumsa
  24. Heo, K. J., "Limitations of constructivism learning theory", CBNU Journal of Educational Research, 28(3), pp.103~131 (2007)
  25. Hwang, H. J., "New theory of mathematics education" (2016), Moonumsa
  26. Hwang, H. J., "Comments on developing mathematics textbooks based on constructivism", The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 9(1), pp.295~309 (1999)
  27. 강은경, "A Search for the Meaning of Constructivism: Constructivism Revisited and Reviewed", 초등수학교육, 21(3), pp.261~272 (2018), 한국수학교육학회[DOI]
  28. Kang, I. A., "A brief reflection on cognitive and social constructivism", Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), pp.3~20 (1995)
  29. Kang, I. A., "Why constructivism?" (1997), Moonumsa
  30. 강인애, "구성주의 연구에 대한 회고와 전망: 국내외 연구동향 비교", 교육공학연구, 22(4), pp.105~135 (2006), 한국교육공학회
  31. Kang, O. K., "A theory of mathematics education" (2010), Kyungmunsa
  32. 김재건, "듀이 경험론의 재고찰: 구성주의 관점에 관련하여", 교육과정연구, 20(1), pp.75~95 (2002), 한국교육과정학회
  33. 김무길, "구성주의와 듀이 지식론의 관련성: 재해석", 교육철학연구, (34), pp.23~43 (2005), 한국교육철학학회
  34. Kim, S. D., "Educational philosophy and pedagogy history" (2011), Yangseowon
  35. 김태향, "구성주의에 바탕을 둔 학습자 중심 수업을 받은 학생들의 학업성취도 - 초등학교 4학년 분수 영역을 중심으로 -", 초등수학교육, 13(2), pp.67~84 (2010), 한국수학교육학회
  36. Kim, Y. B., "The merits and limits of constructivist instruction", The Journal of Educational Research, 22, pp.81~104 (2008)
  37. Kim, Y. S., "On the meaning of radical constructivism in mathematics education", The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 4(1), pp.25~38 (1994)
  38. Kim, Y. S., "A study on the constructivistic development in teaching and learning mathematics", The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 6(1), pp.91~110 (1996)
  39. Kirschner, P. A., "Constructivist instruction: success or failure?", pp.156~169 (2009), Routledge
  40. 이상은, "진보주의 교육사조에 토대를 둔 한국 교육개혁의 역사적 변천과정 탐색", 열린교육연구, 23(4), pp.19~43 (2015), 한국열린교육학회[DOI]
  41. Lee, S. J., "Distributive partitioning operation in mathematical situations involving fractional quantities", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), pp.329~355 (2015)
  42. Lerman, S., "Problem-solving or knowledge-centred : the influence of philosophy on mathematics teaching", International Journal for Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 14(1), pp.59~66 (1983)
  43. McCarthy, C., "Deweyan pragmatism and the quest for true belief", Educational theory, 50(2), pp.213~227 (2000)
  44. 목영해, "구성주의와 제7차 교육과정의 관련성 연구", 교육철학연구, (29), pp.27~43 (2003), 한국교육철학학회
  45. Na, G. S., "(An) Analysis of the nature of proof and practice of proof education : focused on the middle school geometry", Doctor, pp.1998
  46. Namgung, Y. G., "Educational philosophy and pedagogy history" (2008), Yangseowon
  47. 노정원, "들뢰즈의 인식론과 수학 학습", 학교수학, 18(3), pp.733~747 (2016), 대한수학교육학회
  48. 노선숙, "미국 수학교육과정 변천에 관한 연구 : 수학교육개혁의 다양성과 복합성", 교육과정연구, 26(3), pp.121~154 (2008), 한국교육과정학회[DOI]
  49. Oh, C. G., "Educational philosophy and pedagogy history" (2010), Taeyoung Publishing
  50. 박정선, "Paul Ernest의 수학적 지식 구성과정에 대한 교수학적 고찰", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(20), pp.993~1016 (2019), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  51. Park, J. Y., "Educational understanding" (1996), Hakjisa
  52. Prawat, R. S., "Misreading Dewey : Reform, Projects, and the Language Game", Educational Researcher, 24(7), pp.13~22 (1995)
  53. Popper, K. R., "Objective knowledge : an evolutionary approach" (1972), Oxford University Press
  54. Sfard, A., "On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one", Educational researcher, 27(2), pp.4~13 (1998)
  55. Sfard, A, "Cognition as communication: rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students' mathematical interactions", Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(1), pp.42~76 (2001)
  56. Shin, B. H., "Educational philosophy and pedagogy history" (2017), Jeongminsa
  57. Shin, D. R., "An easily written pedagogic and pedagogic history" (2004), Yangseowon
  58. Shin, H. S, "Constructivist perspectives in mathematics curriculum", The Mathematical Education, 31(3), pp.73~82 (1992)
  59. Shin, J., "Problem solving activities of two middle school students with distinct levels of units coordination", Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59, pp.1~19 (2020)
  60. Simon, M. A., "Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), pp.114~145 (1995)
  61. Simon, M. A., "Amidst multiple theories of learning in mathematics education", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), pp.477~490 (2009)
  62. Simon, M., "Towards an integrated theory of mathematics conceptual learning and instructional design : The Learning Through Activity theoretical framework", Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52, pp.95~112 (2018)
  63. Steffe, L. P., "Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies" (1988), Springer-Verlag
  64. Steffe, L. P., "Constructivism in education" (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  65. Steffe, L. P., "Radical constructivism and mathematics education", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, pp.711~733 (1994)
  66. Steffe, L, P., "Children’s fractional knowledge" (2010), Springer
  67. Steffe, L. P., "Research design in mathematics and science education", pp.267~307 (2000), Erlbaum
  68. Steffe, L. P., "On reforming practice in mathematics education", pp.445~465 (1992)
  69. Sweller, J., "Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure?", pp.139~155 (2009), Routledge
  70. Thompson, P. W., "Radical constructivism in action:Building on the pioneering work of Ernst von Glasersfeld", pp.412~448 (2000), Falmer Press
  71. Thompson, P. W., "Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education" (2013), Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
  72. von Glasersfeld, E., "Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching", Synthese, 80(1), pp.121~140 (1989)
  73. von Glasersfeld, E., "International encyclopedia of education. Supplement Volume 1", pp.162~163 (1989), Pergamon Press
  74. von Glasersfeld, E., "An Exposition of Constructivism: Why Some Like It Radical", JRME Monograph, 4, pp.19~30 (1990)
  75. von Glasersfeld, E, "Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education" (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  76. von Glasersfeld, E., "Philosophy of mathematics (Review of Paul Ernest)", Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 24(2), pp.46~ (1992)
  77. von Glasersfeld, E., "Constructivism in education", pp.3~15 (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  78. von Glasersfeld, E., "Constructivism in education", pp.3~15 (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  79. von Glasersfeld, E., "Radical Constructivism : A Way of Knowing and Learning" (1995), Falmer Press
  80. von Glasersfeld, E., "Constructivism in education", pp.23~28 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  81. Wertsch, J. V., "Voices of mind: Sociocultural approach to mediated action" (1991), Hakisiseup
  82. Yackel, E., "Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), pp.458~477 (1993)
  83. 양현수, "수학일지 쓰기 활동이 초등학생의 수학적 성향과 수학적 의사소통 수준에 미치는 영향: 3학년 수와연산 영역을 중심으로", 수학교육, 57(3), pp.247~270 (2018), 한국수학교육학회[DOI]
  84. Yim, J. H., "Mathematics education and constructivism", Journal of the Elementary Education Society, 2, pp.96~108 (1999)
  85. Yim, J. H., "The Meaning and Mechanism of the ‘Construction’ in the Operational Constructivism and the Social Constructivism", Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 8(1), pp.299~312 (1998)
  86. Yoo, Y. J., "Postmodernism and radical, social constructivism", Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 7(2), pp.359~380 (1997)
  87. 윤정민, "상호교류적 쓰기-반성 활동이 수학 학습에 미치는 영향 - 초등학교 2학년을 대상으로 -", 한국초등수학교육학회지, 10(1), pp.21~42 (2006), 한국초등수학교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

구성주의와 듀이 지식론의 관련성: 재해석김무길한국교육철학학회 · 교육철학연구2005 · 제34호우리나라 수학 교수·학습 연구에 적용된 수학교육 이론의 동향김영옥, 박민경영남수학회 · East Asian Mathematical Journal2014 · 제30권 제4호구성주의 지식론의 교육적 재개념화 - 한국의 교육현상을 중심으로 -정석환, 정성수한국교육철학회 · 교육철학2015 · 제56호A Search for the Meaning of Constructivism: Constructivism Revisited and Reviewed강은경한국수학교육학회 · 초등수학교육2018 · 제21권 제3호한국의 수학 교육과정과 수학교육관김종명한국수학사학회 · 한국수학사학회지2004 · 제17권 제2호수학교육에서 상황인지이론의 적용 방안김상룡한국수학교육학회 · 초등수학교육2012 · 제15권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

기표의 구현과 수학적 이해: 경과시간을 중심으로한채린pp. 249-264초등수학 교과서의 자료와 가능성 영역에 제시된 발문의 유형과 기능 분석도주원pp. 265-279수학과 중등학교 교사 임용후보자 선정경쟁시험에서 요구되는 지식의 영역과 수준 분석이소연, 김래영pp. 281-295수학교사의 대수식 쓰기 지도를 위한 발달에 핵심적인 이해최윤형, 이수진pp. 297-319RPP(Role-Play Presentation)를 통한 교사의 AI 교사와의 지각된 상호작용성 분석고호경, 노지화, 허난pp. 321-340
원문 보기