본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

독일의 법학교육, 상사법교육 및 시사점

The legal education system in germany and its suggestions

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Nowadays the legal education system plays very important role internationally. The competitiveness of one country depends on such a legal education system. In the field of commercial law the confusion of legal systems of civil law and common law show its characteristic. The two principal legal systems in the world today are those of civil law and common law. Continental Europe, Latin America, most of Africa and many Central European and Asian nations are part of the civil law system. The United States, along with England and other countries once part of the British Empire, belong to the common law system. The civil law system has its roots in ancient Roman law. The common law system began developing in England almost a millennium ago. By the time England's Parliament was established, its royal judges had already begun basing their decisions on customary law “common” to the realm. A body of decisions was accumulating. Able lawyers assisted the process. On the European continent,Justinian’s resurrected law-books and the legal system of the Catholic Church played critical roles in harmonizing a thousand local laws. We should find out the differences between both legal systems. It is often said that the common law system consists of unwritten “judge-made” law while the civil law system is composed of written codes. For the most part, law in the United States today is “made” by the legislative branch. To some extent, however, the judge-made law analogy is true. But it would be incorrect to say that common law is unwritten law. At the same time, not all law in civil law countries is codified in the sense that it is organized into a comprehensive organic, whole statement of the law on a given subject. Sometimes individual statutes are enacted to deal with specific issues without being codified. Because of globalisierung of law the both legal systems are nearing rapidly. Therefore we should reflect how the both legal systems will be integrated in korean law and legal system. Corporate law is one important example that shows the integration and similarity, especially after the IMF accident in 1997, 1998. Germany has reformed several times commercial law, especially corporate law in recent times. To make establishing corporate easier, germany allowed 1 EURO limited liability company. This trend is similar to korean reform and reform plan. In this sense korean legal system is based on continental civil law system. But the law school is in the near of common law and case based legal system. Nevertheless after beginning of law school in 2009 the korean legal system would not change to anglo-american common law system rapidly. But cases and case study will be more important. In korea the teaching method is based on continental theory based method. Recently court cases play very important role in learning and also teaching. But the students will not question actively during the lecture. It should be therefore reformed. The german legal education system will give us good suggestions, because we belong to continental civil law based country. Case study is important,but legal theories should also not be neglected.

Abstract

Nowadays the legal education system plays very important role internationally. The competitiveness of one country depends on such a legal education system. In the field of commercial law the confusion of legal systems of civil law and common law show its characteristic. The two principal legal systems in the world today are those of civil law and common law. Continental Europe, Latin America, most of Africa and many Central European and Asian nations are part of the civil law system. The United States, along with England and other countries once part of the British Empire, belong to the common law system. The civil law system has its roots in ancient Roman law. The common law system began developing in England almost a millennium ago. By the time England's Parliament was established, its royal judges had already begun basing their decisions on customary law “common” to the realm. A body of decisions was accumulating. Able lawyers assisted the process. On the European continent,Justinian’s resurrected law-books and the legal system of the Catholic Church played critical roles in harmonizing a thousand local laws. We should find out the differences between both legal systems. It is often said that the common law system consists of unwritten “judge-made” law while the civil law system is composed of written codes. For the most part, law in the United States today is “made” by the legislative branch. To some extent, however, the judge-made law analogy is true. But it would be incorrect to say that common law is unwritten law. At the same time, not all law in civil law countries is codified in the sense that it is organized into a comprehensive organic, whole statement of the law on a given subject. Sometimes individual statutes are enacted to deal with specific issues without being codified. Because of globalisierung of law the both legal systems are nearing rapidly. Therefore we should reflect how the both legal systems will be integrated in korean law and legal system. Corporate law is one important example that shows the integration and similarity, especially after the IMF accident in 1997, 1998. Germany has reformed several times commercial law, especially corporate law in recent times. To make establishing corporate easier, germany allowed 1 EURO limited liability company. This trend is similar to korean reform and reform plan. In this sense korean legal system is based on continental civil law system. But the law school is in the near of common law and case based legal system. Nevertheless after beginning of law school in 2009 the korean legal system would not change to anglo-american common law system rapidly. But cases and case study will be more important. In korea the teaching method is based on continental theory based method. Recently court cases play very important role in learning and also teaching. But the students will not question actively during the lecture. It should be therefore reformed. The german legal education system will give us good suggestions, because we belong to continental civil law based country. Case study is important,but legal theories should also not be neglected.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 강대섭, "이사의 보수의 적정성 규제에 관한 쟁점과 판례의 검토, In 「세계화시대의 기업법」, 이기수 선생 정년기념논문집" (2010)
  2. 김건식, "회사법연구Ⅰ" (2010), 도서출판 소화
  3. 김정호, "회사법" (2010), 법문사
  4. 김형배, "독일민법의 계수", 한독법학, (15) (2004)
  5. 서을오, "독일의 법학교육과 평가", 법학교육연구, 1 (2006)
  6. 독일의 “이사보수 적정화에 관한 법률” 제정 동향, "성승제", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2010)
  7. 손주찬, "독일상법이 한국상법에 미친 영향", 한독법학, (14) (2003)
  8. 손주찬, "상법(상), 제13정증보판" (2002), 박영사
  9. 손진화, "상법강의, 제2판" (2010), 신조사
  10. 송옥렬, "상법강의" (2011), 홍문사
  11. 안병직, "독일연방공화국 60년. 1949~2009 분단국가에서 민주통일국가로" (2009), 도서출판 오름
  12. 유주선, "2008년 독일 유한회사법의 개정과 시사점", 상사판례연구, 22(3), pp.109~145 (2009), 한국상사판례학회
  13. 유주선, "유럽연합의 중소기업법 동화를 위한 유럽 유한회사법(안)과 한국의 중소기업법제에 대한 시사점 -회사의 자본, 기관 및 사원의 법적 관계를 중심으로", 일감법학, (18), pp.327~355 (2010), 법학연구소
  14. 이기수, "상법총칙·상행위법, 제7판" (2010), 박영사
  15. 이기수, "어음·수표법, 제7판" (2009), 박영사
  16. 이기수, "회사법, 제8판" (2009), 박영사
  17. 이기수, "보험·해상법, 제8판" (2008), 박영사
  18. 이상돈, "기초법학" (2008), 법문사
  19. 이시우, "독일에서의 법학교육의 현황과 전망", 한국교육법연구 (1995)
  20. 이철송, "회사법강의, 제18판" (2010), 박영사
  21. 이필규, "2009 독일보험계약법(VVG)" (2009), 세창출판사
  22. 전국경제인연합회, "주요국 회사법" (2009)
  23. 전국경제인연합회, "모범회사법" (2010)
  24. 정동윤, "회사법, 제7판" (2001), 법문사
  25. 정성숙, "이사보수의 공개에 관한 독일과 우리나라의 입법동향", 일감법학, (18), pp.287~326 (2010), 법학연구소
  26. 정찬형, "상법강의(상), 제13판" (2010), 박영사
  27. 정쾌영, "독일 주주포럼제도의 도입에 관한 연구", 기업법연구, 22(4), pp.215~245 (2008), 한국기업법학회
  28. 조규창, "한국민법과 독일민법의 관계", 한독법학, (4) (1983)
  29. 조규창, "한국법문화발전에 미친 독일법의 영향", 한독법학, (14) (2003)
  30. 조규창, "독일법사(상)" (2010)
  31. 조지현, "경영판단원칙 - 독일 주식법 내용을 중심으로 -", 경영법률, 21(1), pp.159~185 (2010), 한국경영법률학회
  32. 최갑선, "독일 법학교육의 내용과 방법", 법과 사회, (12) (1995)
  33. 최기원, "상법학신론(상), 제18판" (2009), 박영사
  34. 최준선, "회사법, 제5판" (2010), 삼영사
  35. 하태영, "독일의 법학전문교육과 법조인양성", 동아법학, (39), pp.161~185 (2007), 법학연구소
  36. 홍복기, "주식회사법(판례와 이론)" (2010), 박영사
  37. Baumbach, "Wechselgesetz und Scheckgesetz. 17.Aufl. München", ~ (1990)
  38. Baumbach, "Hopt", Handelsgesetzbuch. 33.Aufl. München, 2008
  39. Canaris, "Handelsrecht. 24.Aufl. München", ~ (2006)
  40. Hueck, "Canaris", Recht der Wertpapiere, 12.Aufl. München, 1986
  41. Larenz, "Wolf", Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts. 8. Aufl. München, 1997
  42. Müller-Christmann, "Wertpapierrecht" (1992)
  43. Raiser, "Veil", Recht der Kapitalgesellschaften, 5. Aufl., München, 2009
  44. Rüffer, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz", pp.Baden-Baden, Halbach
  45. Schmidt, "Gesellschaftsrecht, 4. Aufl., Köln, Berlin, Bonn, München", ~ (2002)
  46. Wolf/Lindacher/Pfeiffer, "AGB-Recht. 5. Aufl., München", ~ (2009)
  47. Zöllner, "Wertpapierrecht. 14. Aufl. München", ~ (1987)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)