독일의 2009년 회사 관계법 개정과 시사점
German Corporate Law Reform in 2009 and Some Suggestions
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article studies the reform trend of corporate law not only in germany, but also in korea. The author analysed the reform trend in germany, especially in the years of 2009 and 2010. Thereby he has studied statues and theories about account modernization, shareholder rights exercise, CEO pay and reform of restructuring law. Above all it handles with the recent enactment of germany(2009, 2010) and its evaluation. EU commission has also enacted the advice about shareholder rights exercise and the adequate CEO pay(2009). The EU countries should reflect this advice into the national law until determined time. In korea the jurisdiction cases concentrate on ensuring the pay of directors. The discussion about appropriateness of CEO pay will be also important issue in korea in short time. In the process of globalization, the US american law is more important. Germany belongs to continental european law country like korea. Therefore the examples of continental european law country like germany can give korea much more suggestions in the field of enactment. This is true also in case of shareholder rights exercise and adequate CEO pay. In korea there is a trend of establishing remuneration committee. In reality, LG Display and Hynix habe already established and Samsung electronics is planing to establish it. Then the enactment in germany and EU will give us helpful suggestions. The article 388 of korean commercial code should be revised. The directors' pay should be in adequate relation to their effort and achievement. And the pay should be settled in the valuation of directorseffort and achievement in longer perspective. Germany has adopted the business judgement rule in 2005(UMAG). This can also give some suggestions to korea. The reform trend of corporate law both in germany and korea show some common contents. Germany and korea experience the same movement in regard of the globalization of corporate law. There are also some divergence because of the customs and legal traditions of two countries.
Abstract
This article studies the reform trend of corporate law not only in germany, but also in korea. The author analysed the reform trend in germany, especially in the years of 2009 and 2010. Thereby he has studied statues and theories about account modernization, shareholder rights exercise, CEO pay and reform of restructuring law. Above all it handles with the recent enactment of germany(2009, 2010) and its evaluation. EU commission has also enacted the advice about shareholder rights exercise and the adequate CEO pay(2009). The EU countries should reflect this advice into the national law until determined time. In korea the jurisdiction cases concentrate on ensuring the pay of directors. The discussion about appropriateness of CEO pay will be also important issue in korea in short time. In the process of globalization, the US american law is more important. Germany belongs to continental european law country like korea. Therefore the examples of continental european law country like germany can give korea much more suggestions in the field of enactment. This is true also in case of shareholder rights exercise and adequate CEO pay. In korea there is a trend of establishing remuneration committee. In reality, LG Display and Hynix habe already established and Samsung electronics is planing to establish it. Then the enactment in germany and EU will give us helpful suggestions. The article 388 of korean commercial code should be revised. The directors' pay should be in adequate relation to their effort and achievement. And the pay should be settled in the valuation of directorseffort and achievement in longer perspective. Germany has adopted the business judgement rule in 2005(UMAG). This can also give some suggestions to korea. The reform trend of corporate law both in germany and korea show some common contents. Germany and korea experience the same movement in regard of the globalization of corporate law. There are also some divergence because of the customs and legal traditions of two countries.
참고문헌 (27)
- 권종호, "일본 신 회사법의 특징과 시사점", 상장협, (54) (2006)
- 김재호, "증권집단소송의 사례와 시사점", 상장, (423) (2010)
- 김정호, "회사법" (2010), 법문사
- 성승제, "임원보수의 합리적 기준 설정에 관한 법적 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 성승제, "독일의 이사 보수 규제", 법학연구, 18(2), pp.63~90 (2010), 법학연구소
- 손진화, "상법강의, 제2판" (2010), 신조사
- 안성포, "독일 회사법의 개혁과 최근 동향 -2005년도 UMAG에 의한 주식법 개정을 중심으로", 기업법연구, 19(3), pp.83~110 (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 양만식, "최근 일본 회사법의 개정동향-이사의 회사에 대한 책임과 주주대표소송의 개정을 중심으로-", 기업법연구, 19(3), pp.55~82 (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 이기수, "「회사법」 제8판" (2009), 박영사
- 이서원, "독일 경제가 위기에 강한 이유", 신동아, 통권 : 610 (2010)
- 이철송, "「회사법강의」 제18판" (2010), 박영사
- 이형규, "독일 회사법의 최근 개정 동향", 상장협, (54) (2006)
- 전국경제인연합회, "주요국 회사법", ~ (2009)
- 정대익, "21세기 진입을 전후한 독일 주식회사법의 주요 개정내용(1): 2000년 이전", 법학논고, 21 (2004), 경북대학교 법학연구소
- 정대익, "21세기 진입을 전후한 독일 주식회사법의 주요 개정내용(2): 2000년 이후", 경북대학교 법학연구소, 25 (2006)
- 정동윤, "「상법(상)」, 제4판" (2009), 법문사
- 정성숙, "이사보수의 공개에 관한 독일과 우리나라의 입법동향", 기업법제의 최근 동향과 쟁점, 건국대학교 법학연구소 세미나자료집 (2010)
- 정찬형, "「상법강의(상)」, 제13판" (2010), 박영사
- 최문희, "“독일의 주식회사 관련법 개정 동향,” 21세기 회사법 개정의 논리" (2007), 도서출판 소화
- 최병규, "독일 회사법 변천의 시사점과 한국회사법 개정방향", 기업법연구, 22(4), pp.185~214 (2008), 한국기업법학회
- 최병규, "적정한 이사의 보수를 위한 독일의 법개정과 유럽연합권고", 상사판례연구, 22(3), pp.359~395 (2009), 한국상사판례학회
- 최병규, "유럽연합의 주주권지침의 내용과 그의 독일에서의 수용", 유럽법학, (6) (2009)
- 최준선, "회사법" (2004), 삼영사
- 함승완, "증권관련집단소송의 진행과 관련한 몇 가지 쟁점들", BFL, (43) (2010)
- 홍 진 희, "일본 회사법의 현대화", 법조, 54(11), pp.172~212 (2005), 법조협회
- Kübler, "Gesellschaftsrecht, 5. Aufl." (1999), Heidelberg
- Raiser, "Recht der Kapitalgesellschaften" (2006), München
