본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미국의 상사법 교육의 현황과 시사점

Commercial Law Teaching Methodology in the United States

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The US law professors use various teaching methods for commercial law and corporations law classes. They tend to use traditional case-socratic method for first year courses and other basic courses. Problem method,seminar type of classes are used for upper-level classes. Legal Clinic is also an important way of providing practical experience to the students. Korean legal system can find its origin in the civil law system, where statutes and codes come before the cases, and the cases do not have binding force of law. Therefore using traditional case-socratic method as in the US for Korean law school subjects may not be appropriate. Instead, it will be helpful to use both statutes and cases in the class. Problem method seems to be a good way to provide Korean law school students opportunities to apply the learned legal principles to real-world situations. However it will require the professors’ as well as the students’ much time and preparation in order to make the class discussions meaningful. Practical seminar and academic seminar also seem to be good ways of teaching Korean law school students. Although the US legal education is mainly geared at raising legal practitioners, law schools also focus on producing legal scholars. In that regard, most US law schools have writing requirements for the students to graduate. It usually includes first year wiring requirement and upper-class writing requirement. Students generally satisfy the upper-class wiring requirement by submitting a 25∼50 page thesis paper through an academic seminar, or under supervision of a faculty member. Korean legal education is currently carried out in undergraduate and graduate law colleges and newly established law schools. It seems that graduate law colleges take academic approach to raise legal scholars, and law schools take practical approach to raise legal practitioners. Korean graduate law colleges may be able to find some ideas of training their students from the US law school’s academic approach focusing on writing requirements.

Abstract

The US law professors use various teaching methods for commercial law and corporations law classes. They tend to use traditional case-socratic method for first year courses and other basic courses. Problem method,seminar type of classes are used for upper-level classes. Legal Clinic is also an important way of providing practical experience to the students. Korean legal system can find its origin in the civil law system, where statutes and codes come before the cases, and the cases do not have binding force of law. Therefore using traditional case-socratic method as in the US for Korean law school subjects may not be appropriate. Instead, it will be helpful to use both statutes and cases in the class. Problem method seems to be a good way to provide Korean law school students opportunities to apply the learned legal principles to real-world situations. However it will require the professors’ as well as the students’ much time and preparation in order to make the class discussions meaningful. Practical seminar and academic seminar also seem to be good ways of teaching Korean law school students. Although the US legal education is mainly geared at raising legal practitioners, law schools also focus on producing legal scholars. In that regard, most US law schools have writing requirements for the students to graduate. It usually includes first year wiring requirement and upper-class writing requirement. Students generally satisfy the upper-class wiring requirement by submitting a 25∼50 page thesis paper through an academic seminar, or under supervision of a faculty member. Korean legal education is currently carried out in undergraduate and graduate law colleges and newly established law schools. It seems that graduate law colleges take academic approach to raise legal scholars, and law schools take practical approach to raise legal practitioners. Korean graduate law colleges may be able to find some ideas of training their students from the US law school’s academic approach focusing on writing requirements.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 김광록, "한국의 금융법과 미국의 교육방법론 - 우리나라 로스쿨에 맞는 교육방법론에 대한 고찰", 법학연구, 51(2), pp.1~34 (2010), 법학연구소
  2. 신창섭, "미국의 로스쿨과 법학교육", 안암법학, 통권 : 20, pp.28~38 (2005), 홍문사
  3. 윤남근, "리걸클리닉 교육(Clinical Legal Education)의 의의, 현황 및 과제", 고려법학, (57), pp.127~168 (2010), 법학연구원
  4. 이영종, "로스쿨과 학부에서의 상법학 및 사회법학 교육", 법학연구, pp.48~78 (2009), 카톨릭 대학교 법학연구소
  5. 이재협, "미국의 법학교육: 과거, 현재, 그리고 미래", 미국학, 31(2), pp.117~140 (2008), 미국학연구소
  6. 전형배, "변호사시험과 상법 교육방법론", 저스티스, (118), pp.277~303 (2010), 한국법학원
  7. 최완진, "로스쿨 체제하에서의 상사법분야의 개설과목과 교수방법에 관한 고찰", 법학논고, (28), pp.355~389 (2008), 법학연구원
  8. 최재성, "한국의 로스쿨 제도 및 변호사시험-미국 로스쿨 방식의 교육은 불가능한 것인가?", 대한변협신문 제337호 9면, 2011년 1월24일, ~ (2011)
  9. "A Conversation with Dean William Treanor", Georgetown Law Magazine, (fall), pp.26~33 (2010)
  10. Jo Ellen D. Lewis, "Workshop for Developing and Implementing Effective Legal Writing Programs and Teaching Oral Communications Skills", 워크숍 자료 (2009)
  11. 부산대학교 법학전문대학원, "워크숍 자료, 특성화 관련 교육방법 워크숍" (2010)
  12. "University of San Francisco 로스쿨 3학년 최연수 학생과 전화 인터뷰, 2011년 1월26일", ~ (2011)
  13. "University of Wisconsin 로스쿨 3학년 김동근 학생과 전화 인터뷰, 2011년 1월 27일", ~ (2011)
  14. "Northwestern University 로스쿨 방문, 2010년 9월 22일", ~ (2010)
  15. "University of Kansas 로스쿨 방문, 2007년 10월24일~26일", ~ (2007)
  16. "University of Alabama 로스쿨 방문, 2010년 2월4일~5일", ~ (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)