본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

독일의 최근 회사법 개정 동향과 시사점

A Study on Recent German Corporate Law Reform Trend and Some Suggestions

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This article studies the reform trend of corporate law not only in germany, but also in korea. The author analysed the reform discussion in germany, especially in the years of 2012. Thereby he has analysed the reform discussion. It includes reverse CB, preferred stock, an action of nullity about general stock holders meeting. He has furthermore handled statues and theories about account modernization, shareholder rights exercise, CEO pay and reform of restructuring law. Above all, it handles with the recent enactment of germany(2009, 2010) and its evaluation. EU commission has also enacted the advice about shareholder rights exercise and the adequate CEO pay(2009). The EU countries should reflect this advice into the national law until determined time. In korea the jurisdiction cases concentrate on ensuring the pay of directors. The discussion about appropriateness of CEO pay will be also important issue in korea in short time. In the process of globalization, the US american law is more important. Germany belongs to continental european law country like korea. Therefore the examples of continental european law country like germany can give korea much more suggestions in the field of enactment. This is true also in case of shareholder rights exercise and adequate CEO pay. In korea there is a trend of establishing remuneration committee. In reality, LG Display and Hynix habe already established and Samsung electronics is planing to establish it. Then the enactment in germany and EU will give us helpful suggestions. The article 388 of korean commercial code should be revised. The directors󰡑 pay should be in adequate relation to their effort and achievement. And the pay should be settled in the valuation of directors󰡑effort and achievement in longer perspective. In regard of convertible bond reform, germany is going to introduce the CB that allows transferring right to company. Until now, by the CB, the transferring right is only allowed to the debenture holder. Germany is going to introduce non-cumulative preferred stock. This is closely related that finance company should have sufficient equity capital. The cumulative preferred stock is not regarded as equity capital. Furthermore, germany is going to introduce relative time limit(one month) for the suit of nullity, in case of abuse of suiting right. Germany is also going to reform the bearer stock system. The company should deposit master policy to banks in case of unlisted company. This is introduced to prevent money laundering. It is necessary to comply with the international demand. The reform trend of corporate law both in germany and korea show some common contents. Germany and korea experience the same movement in regard of the globalization of corporate law. There are also some divergence because of the customs and legal traditions of two countries.

Abstract

This article studies the reform trend of corporate law not only in germany, but also in korea. The author analysed the reform discussion in germany, especially in the years of 2012. Thereby he has analysed the reform discussion. It includes reverse CB, preferred stock, an action of nullity about general stock holders meeting. He has furthermore handled statues and theories about account modernization, shareholder rights exercise, CEO pay and reform of restructuring law. Above all, it handles with the recent enactment of germany(2009, 2010) and its evaluation. EU commission has also enacted the advice about shareholder rights exercise and the adequate CEO pay(2009). The EU countries should reflect this advice into the national law until determined time. In korea the jurisdiction cases concentrate on ensuring the pay of directors. The discussion about appropriateness of CEO pay will be also important issue in korea in short time. In the process of globalization, the US american law is more important. Germany belongs to continental european law country like korea. Therefore the examples of continental european law country like germany can give korea much more suggestions in the field of enactment. This is true also in case of shareholder rights exercise and adequate CEO pay. In korea there is a trend of establishing remuneration committee. In reality, LG Display and Hynix habe already established and Samsung electronics is planing to establish it. Then the enactment in germany and EU will give us helpful suggestions. The article 388 of korean commercial code should be revised. The directors󰡑 pay should be in adequate relation to their effort and achievement. And the pay should be settled in the valuation of directors󰡑effort and achievement in longer perspective. In regard of convertible bond reform, germany is going to introduce the CB that allows transferring right to company. Until now, by the CB, the transferring right is only allowed to the debenture holder. Germany is going to introduce non-cumulative preferred stock. This is closely related that finance company should have sufficient equity capital. The cumulative preferred stock is not regarded as equity capital. Furthermore, germany is going to introduce relative time limit(one month) for the suit of nullity, in case of abuse of suiting right. Germany is also going to reform the bearer stock system. The company should deposit master policy to banks in case of unlisted company. This is introduced to prevent money laundering. It is necessary to comply with the international demand. The reform trend of corporate law both in germany and korea show some common contents. Germany and korea experience the same movement in regard of the globalization of corporate law. There are also some divergence because of the customs and legal traditions of two countries.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 박준, "회사법 제3판" (2012), 박영사
  2. 김은경, "독일 개정주식법의 동향, In 회사법에 관한 우리나라 및 외국의 입법동향", 상사법학회 2012년 춘계학술대회 자료집 (2012), 상사법학회
  3. 김정호, "회사법, 제 2 판" (2012), 法文社
  4. 법무부, "상법 회사편 해설, In 상법해설서 시리즈 Ⅱ" (2012)
  5. 최병규, "회사법" (2011), 박영사
  6. 이철송, "회사법강의(제20판)" (2012), 박영사
  7. 전경련, "주요국 회사법" (2009), 전국경제인연합회
  8. 정동윤, "회사법 제7판" (2001), 법문사
  9. 정성숙, "이사보수의 공개에 관한 독일과 우리나라의 입법동향", 일감법학, (18), pp.287~326 (2010), 법학연구소
  10. 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
  11. 최기원, "상법학신론(상) 제18판" (2009), 박영사
  12. 최준선, "회사법 제7판" (2012), 삼영사
  13. 장근영, "회사법 - 사례와 이론 -" (2012), (주)박영사
  14. Grunewald, "Gesellschaftsrecht, 8. Aufl" (2011)
  15. Raiser, "Recht der Kapitalgesellschaften, 5. Aufl" (2010)
  16. Schmidt, "Gesellschaftsrecht, 4. Aufl" (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)