친구와 도움의 사회적 연결망 탐색: 연결망 구조, 개인 간 상호작용, 사회적 영향을 중심으로
Social networks of friends and helpers: Structural features, social interaction, and social influence
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
개인이 맺고 있는 사회적 관계와 속해 있는 사회적 연결망은 개인의 가치 태도와 행동에 중요한 영향을 미친다. 역동적이고 지속적인 사회적 상호작용을 통해 개인은 자신과 비슷한 성향 및 태도를 보이는 타인과 관계를 맺고 서로 영향을 주고받는다. 그동안 많은 연구들이 사회적 연결망과 개인의 행동 간의 관계를 살펴보았으나, 대부분 친구 관계에 초점을 맞추었다는 한계가 있다. 이에 본 연구는 청소년의 친구와 도움의 관계를 바탕으로 두 사회적 연결망의 구조, 개인 간 상호 작용, 사회적 영향의 특성을 살펴보고 차이를 검증하였다. 종단적 사회연결망 분석을 통해 살펴본 결과, 친구 연결망은 도움 연결망에 비해 밀도와 군집을 형성하려는 응집성이 높은데 반해 도움 연결망은 상대적으로 느슨하고 개방되어 있으나 중앙성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 비슷한 성향의 사회적 타자와 관계를 맺으려는 특성은 친구 관계에서 보다 강하게 나타났으며, 사회적인 영향은 두 연결망 간에 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 연구 결과는 사회적 관계가 개인에게 미치는 영향을 검증하는데 있어 사회적 연결망의 구조적 특성을 살펴보는 것이 필요하며, 가까운 친구뿐만 아니라 도움을 주고받는 관계를 포함한 다양한 사회적 관계를 함께 고려해야 함을 강조한다.
Abstract
Social relationships and social networks have significant influence on individuals’ beliefs and behaviors. Through ongoing and dynamic social interactions, individuals connect with similar others and socialize their attributes. Although extensive research has investigated the interdependent changes of social networks and individual attributes, most research has focused on networks of friends. The current study examined and compared the network structural features, social interaction, and social influence between early adolescents’ friend and help networks. Results with longitudinal social network analysis indicated that friend networks were characterized by high density and peer group clusters, while help networks were characterized as loose-knit networks with high centrality. Also, homophily selection was more salient in the friend networks, while the magnitude of social influence did not vary between the two networks. Results underscore that examining structural features of social networks as well as considering different social ties are important for advancing our understanding of social influence processes.
참고문헌 (48)
- Altermatt, E., "Friends’ response to children’s discourse of an achievement related success: An observational study", Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57(4), pp.429~454 (2011)[DOI]
- Bandura, A., "Social learning theory" (1977), Prentice-Hall
- Berger, C. R., "Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication", Human Communication Research, 1(2), pp.99~112 (1975)[DOI]
- Berndt, T., "Children’s friendships: shifts over a half-century in perspectives on their development and their effects", Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), pp.206~223 (2004)[DOI]
- Byrne, D. E., "The Attraction Paradigm" (1971), Academic Press
- Byrne, D., "Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(6), pp.659~663 (1965)[DOI]
- Centola, D., "The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment", Science, 329(5996), pp.1194~1197 (2010)[DOI]
- Centola, D., "How behavior spreads: The science of complex contagions" (2018), Princeton University Press
- 조홍식, "체육수업에 대한 기대-가치 지각이 학생들의 교과 흥미도와 과제 지속성에 미치는 영향", 한국체육과학회지, 25(3), pp.1029~1042 (2016), 한국체육과학회
- Christakis, N. A., "The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years", New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), pp.370~379 (2007)[DOI]
- Christakis, N. A., "Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior", Statistics in Medicine, 32(4), pp.556~577 (2013)[DOI]
- Cillessen, A. H., "Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modelling analysis", Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), pp.935~959 (2006)[DOI]
- Cillessen, A. H. N., "From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status", Child Development, 75(1), pp.147~163 (2004)[DOI]
- Dijkstra, J. K., "Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents’ friendship selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status", Aggressive Behavior, 37(5), pp.417~429 (2011)[DOI]
- Dishion, T., "Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional processes", Child Development, 66(1), pp.139~151 (1995)[DOI]
- Eccles, J., "Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches", pp.75~146 (1983), Freeman
- Flashman, J., "Academic achivement and its impact on friend dynamics", Sociology of Education, 85(1), pp.61~80 (2012)[DOI]
- Fredrick, J. A., "Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains", Developmental Psychology, 38(4), pp.519~533 (2002)[DOI]
- Gladwell, M., "The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference" (2000), Little, Brown and Company
- Granovetter, M. S., "The strength of weak ties", American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), pp.1360~1380 (1973)[DOI]
- Guilbeault, D., "Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(39), pp.9714~9719 (2018)[DOI]
- 한순미, "학습동기 변인들과 인지전략 및 학업성취간의 관계", 교육심리연구, 18(1), pp.329~350 (2004), 한국교육심리학회
- Hinde, R. A., "Relationships: A dialectical perspective" (1997), Psychological Press
- Huisman, M., "Treatment of non-response in longitudinal network studies", Social Networks, 30(4), pp.297~308 (2008)[DOI]
- Juvonen, J., "Grade-level differences in the social value of effort: Implications for self-presentation tactics of early adolescence", Child Development, 66(6), pp.1694~1705 (1995)[DOI]
- Kandel, D. B., "Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships", American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), pp.427~436 (1978)[DOI]
- Kim, Y., "Social Network Analysis" (2016), Park Youngsa
- Knecht, A., "Friendship and delinquency: Selection and influence processes in early adolescence", Social Development, 19(3), pp.494~514 (2010)[DOI]
- McPherson, M., "Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks", Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), pp.415~444 (2001)[DOI]
- Mercken, L., "Dynamics of adolescent friend networks and smoking behavior: Social network analysis in six European countries", Social Science & Medicine, 69(10), pp.1506~1514 (2009)[DOI]
- Newman, R. S., "Students’ help-seeking during problem solving: Effects of grade, goal, and prior achievement", American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), pp.352~376 (1995)[DOI]
- NNorth, E. A., "Social status and classroom behavior in math and science during early adolescence", Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(3), pp.597~608 (2019)[DOI]
- Ripley, R. M., "Manual for RSiena", University of Oxford: Department of Statistics, Nuffield College, ~ (2021)
- Rodkin, P., "Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations", Developmental Psychology, 36(1), pp.14~24 (2000)[DOI]
- Rodkin, P., "Educational Psychology Handbook", pp.363~389 (2012), APA publications
- Rogers, E. M., "Diffusion of Innovations" (2003), The Free Press
- Shin, H., "Early adolescent friendships and academic adjustment: Examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal social network analysis", Developmental Psychology, 50(11), pp.2462~2472 (2014)[DOI]
- Shin, H., "Friend influence on early adolescent disruptive behavior in the classroom: Teacher emotional support matters", Developmental Psychology, 53(1), pp.114~125 (2017)[DOI]
- Shin, H., "Friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression, pro-social behavior, and social status: the moderating role of gender", Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), pp.2305~2320 (2017)[DOI]
- Shin, H., "Who are popular, liked, and admired? Longitudinal associations between three social status and academic- social behavior", Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(9), pp.1783~1792 (2020)[DOI]
- Snijders, T. A., "The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics", Sociological Methodology, 31(1), pp.361~395 (2001)[DOI]
- Steglich, C., "Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence", Sociological Methodology, 40(1), pp.329~393 (2010)[DOI]
- Tenney, E. R., "Being liked is more than having a good personality: The role of matching", Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), pp.579~585 (2009)[DOI]
- van Zalk, M., "Idiosyncratic versus social consensus approaches to personality: Self-view, perceived, and peer-view similarity", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), pp.121~141 (2015)[DOI]
- Veenstra, R., "Handbook of Developmental Research Methods", pp.598~618 (2012), Guilford Press
- Wang, C., "Neither influence nor selection: Examining co-evolution of political orientation and social networks in the NetSense and NetHealth studies", PLOS one, 15(5), pp.e0233458~ (2020)[DOI]
- Wasserman, S. S., "Sociological Methodology", pp.392~412 (1980), Jossey-Bass
- Watt, H. M. G., "Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th- through 11th-grade Australian students", Child Development, 75(5), pp.1556~1574 (2004)[DOI]
