대만 시사토론 프로그램 중 國語와 閩南語 간의 코드전환 양상 및 유형 연구

Abstract

In this study, the background and pattern of Mandarin-South Min dialect code-switching in Taiwan were investigated by focusing on code-switching frequently used in current affairs debate programs in Taiwan. Taiwan’s media outlets were influenced by the two major political parties and maintained their political orientation, and viewers also preferred those news or current affairs programs that matched their political orientation. On the basis of this, the proportion of the use of South Min dialect spoken in the Pro-Kuomintang’s “新聞深喉嚨” and the Pro-Democratic Progressive Party of Taiwan’s “鄭知道了” are calculated. As a result, if we exclude exceptional circumstances, as we expected, a comparison of the average use rate of South Min dialect in the group “新聞深喉嚨” (b) and “鄭知道了” filmed under the same conditions as “鄭知道了” as expected. 1.41%: 7.98%”, indicating that the average use rate of South Min dialect in “鄭知道了” was about 5 times higher. The comparison was made across five categories of “campaign-style speech type (hereafter CST)” and “discussion-style speech type (hereafter DST)”. First, the comparison of “the point of code-switching” is as follows. the CST is uttered exclusively in South Min dialect until the end of the campaign form utterance after the code is switched from Mandarin to South Min dialect. On the other hand, the DST is a form in which 2 to 4 speakers can freely discuss after the code-switching between Mandarin and South Min dialect is carried out. With this code-switching, the utterance proceeds freely. Second, comparing the “length of speech” is as follows. The CST is often longer than 10 minutes, but the DST is generally shorter than the CST. Third, when comparing “communication with the audience”, CST often asks short-answer questions to the audience and listens to a fixed answer about the core content in order to communicate with the audience in the middle of the speech. In DST, only a small number of panelists who are interested in the subject participated, and sometimes the moderator participated in the process. Fourth, if we compare the “speaker’s speech attitude”, in the CST, it is passionate enough to resemble an election campaign or political agitation, while the DST sometimes debates violently. In general, discussions are often done in the usual way. Fifth, when comparing the “starting point and ending point of code-switching”, at the front part of the starting code-switching and the rear part of the ending code-switching, CST are often provided by the program host who speaks in Mandarin at that time. While in the DST, it was found that there must be someone who speaks in Mandarin who start or end code-switching, but the program host does not necessarily make the speech.