화서(華西) 이항로(李恒老)의 『주역전의동이석의(周易傳義同異釋義)』에 관한 연구

Abstract

This paper examines Yi Hang-Ro(李恒老)'s Juyeokjeonuidongyiseokui(『周易傳義同異釋義』). Contrary to the title, Yi Hang-Ro's Juyeokjeonuidongyiseokui focuses on the interpretation of Zhu Xi(朱熹)'s Zhouyibenyi(『周易本義』) rather than the interpretation of Cheng Yi(程頤)'s Chengshiyizhuan(『程氏易傳』). The reason it had no choice but to be so is because, as in Jujadaedeonchaeuijipbo(『朱子大全箚疑輯補』), Zhu Xi, Song Si-Yeol(宋時烈), and Yi Hang-Ro are connected by one track. This may also be due to the fact that the period in which Yi Hang-Ro lived was Protect what is right and reject what is evil(衛正斥邪). And Yeogseol(『易說』), which is known to be a similar work of Song Si-yeol, is not a work of Song Si-Yeol, so it was not examined separately in this paper. The characteristic of Yi Hang-Ro's Juyeokjeonuidongyiseokui is that it is written with a focus on Zhu Xi's Zhouyibenyi, and the part that is considered necessary in the anthem is explained in a question-and-answer(按說) format. In addition, Yeogseol(『易說』) is annotated after Juyeokjeonuidongyiseokui. Another unusual thing is that it is from a different school and quotes the opinion of Jeong Yak-Yong(丁若鏞), who was negative about Zhu Xi's Zhouyibenyi. This seems to have been cited because Jeong Yak-Yong was a person of a similar era to Yi Hang-Ro and Jeong Yak-Yong's Juyeogsajeon(『周易四箋』 suggests a unique method of interpretation. Yi Hang-Ro's Juyeokjeonuidongyiseokui is a unique work in that it is different in character from other Noron(老論). I think a lot of research is needed on this in the future.