朱陸異同과 元代 朱陸和會論에 대한 再檢討

Abstract

Some of Chinese NeoConfucianists, from 14th century, asserted that the difference of Zhuxi and Liuxiàngshān in philosophical aspect was not fundamental, and they agreed the other's thought. This assertion succeeded to Wàngshǒurén's the treatise on the last theory of Zhuxi. But this is merely a hypothesis, because this assertion has no evidences. Those who asserted this hypothesis wanted the power of Zhixism as a government school and to reform that time's decadence of philosophy. So their assertion is not an assertion for learning's sake. At the end of Ming Dynasty, Huangtzungshi extended the area of this assertion to Yuán Dynasty Zhuxism, and write on the history of Chinese philosophy from Yuán to Ming in this point of view. As a result of this works, nowadays, this assertion is accepted very important view of Chinese philosophy after Zhuxi. But there is none of evidence for this assertion nor reasonableness in this assertion, because their evidences are restricted and distorted for their assertion. So we cannot use this hypothesis to explain After Zhixi Zhuxism.