본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

불임(난임)부부 지원정책의 평가와 전망 - 여성의 출산권과 건강권을 중심으로 -

The infertile couple support policy: evaluation and prospect - Focused on women`s rights to child-birth and rights to health

1

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study reviewed the infertile couple support policy in the aspects of the right to birth and health of women, and analyzed the dilemma. In the analytical process, the relationship among the government power, medical power, and the women’s right to birth was examined in order to suggest a practical solution to securing a right to healthy birth. In Korea, the infertility policy was introduced as the response by the government to the low birth-rate crisis and to the demand of right to birth for infertile women. Consequently, the support policy for infertile couples has lessened somewhat the burden of medical costs for infertile couples, but limited the right to birth and infringed the right to health. It becomes a dilemma that infertile women often want the support on medical costs for their right to birth despite infringed right to health and limited right to birth. The burden of medical costs for infertile couples appears to be an obstacle to the right to birth and even acting as a factor for giving up their own health rights. Therefore, to guarantee the right to healthy birth, the publicity of a maternal instinct should be secured by bringing full support on the medical cost or by applying the medical insurance.

Abstract

This study reviewed the infertile couple support policy in the aspects of the right to birth and health of women, and analyzed the dilemma. In the analytical process, the relationship among the government power, medical power, and the women’s right to birth was examined in order to suggest a practical solution to securing a right to healthy birth. In Korea, the infertility policy was introduced as the response by the government to the low birth-rate crisis and to the demand of right to birth for infertile women. Consequently, the support policy for infertile couples has lessened somewhat the burden of medical costs for infertile couples, but limited the right to birth and infringed the right to health. It becomes a dilemma that infertile women often want the support on medical costs for their right to birth despite infringed right to health and limited right to birth. The burden of medical costs for infertile couples appears to be an obstacle to the right to birth and even acting as a factor for giving up their own health rights. Therefore, to guarantee the right to healthy birth, the publicity of a maternal instinct should be secured by bringing full support on the medical cost or by applying the medical insurance.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 김경례, "기술의 문화적 재현과정과 실천: 보조생식술을 중심으로", 젠더와 문화, 3(2), pp.149~189 (2010), 여성학연구소[DOI]
  2. 김경례, "난임여성의 경험을 통해서 본 생식기술", 박사, 사회학과, pp.2010
  3. 박용운, "불임 여성의 몸을 통해 본 재생산기술의 정치학 : 시험관 아기 기술을 중심으로", 석사, 여성학, pp.2002
  4. 보건복지부, "불임부부지원사업안내", 보건복지부, ~ (2006)
  5. 보건복지부, "불임부부지원사업안내", 보건복지부, ~ (2007)
  6. 보건복지가족부, "불임부부지원사업안내", 보건복지가족부, ~ (2008)
  7. 보건복지가족부, "불임부부지원사업안내", 보건복지가족부, ~ (2009)
  8. 보건복지부, "2009년도 모자보건사업안내", 보건복지부, ~ (2009)
  9. 보건복지부, "난임(불임)부부지원사업안내", 보건복지부, ~ (2010)
  10. 보건복지부, "2011년도 난임부부 시술비 지원사업 안내", 보건복지부, ~ (2011)
  11. 우리나라 불임 및 불임관련 의료이용실태와 문제해결을 위한 연구, "보건사회연구원", 한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2003)
  12. 보조생식술의 의학적, 윤리적 기준 연구와 적정한 시술 지침 개발, "질병관리본부", 질병관리본부, ~ (2007)
  13. 하정옥, "불임부부 지원 사업, 누구를 위한 무엇을 위한 정책인가?", 한국여성학회 제1차 학술포럼 저출산 정책에 대한 여성주의적 재해석 발표문 (2011)
  14. 한국여성민우회, "여성과 건강", 여성건강토론회 자료집 (2002)
  15. 한국여성민우회, , 생명과학기술시대 여성인권확보를 위한 국제포럼 (2006)
  16. 한국여성민우회, "여성의 몸과 국가주의: 난자문제를 중심으로" (2006)
  17. 보조생식술 관련시술 체계적분류 및 표준화수가에 관한 연구: 불임부부 적정지원 체계구축, "한양대 산학협력단", 보건복지부, ~ (2007)
  18. 황나미, "한국의 출산율 저하와 불임 대처를 위한 정책적 지원방안", 보건산업기술동향, 통권 : 29, pp.3~10 (2007), 한국보건산업진흥원
  19. Balsamo, A., "Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg Women" (1996), Duke University Press
  20. Butler, J., "Gender Trouble: Feminism and the discursive limits of sex" (1993), Routledge
  21. Collins, P. H., "Black Sexual Politic: Africans, Gender, and the New Racism" (2004), Routledge
  22. Corea, G., "Man-Made Women: How new reproductive technologies affect women" (1985), Hutchinson
  23. Dalla Costa, M., "GYNOCIDE: Hysterectomy, Capitalist Patriarchy and the Medical Abuse of Women" (2007), Autonomedia
  24. Firestone, S., "The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution" (1970), Bantam Books
  25. Foucault, M., "Society Must Be Defended, In Lectures at the College de France 1975-76" (2003), Picador
  26. Grosz, E., "Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism" (1994), Indiana University Press
  27. Haraway, D. J., "Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature" (1991), Routledge
  28. Haraway, D. J., "Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium FemaleManⓒ_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience" (1997), Routledge
  29. Jagger, A., "Feminist Politics and Human Nature" (1993), The Harvester Press
  30. Nelson, J. A., "Women of Color and the Reproductive Rights Movement" (2003), New York University Press
  31. O'Brien, M., "The politics of reproduction" (1983), Unwin Hyman
  32. Rich, A., "Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution" (1976), W. W. Norton & Company
  33. Rowland, R., "Living Laboratories: Women and Reproductive Technologies" (1992), Indiana University Press
  34. Stanworth, M., "Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine" (1987), Polity
  35. Thompson, L., "The Wandering Womb: A Cultural History of Outrageous Beliefs about Women" (1999), Prometheus Books
  36. Tong, R., "Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction" (2009), Westview
  37. 의협신문, "퇴장방지약의 퇴장...제약사 책임은 없나?", ~ (2007)
  38. MBC 뉴스데스크, "불임정책지원 정책 병원만 배불렀다", ~ (2007)
  39. SBS 8시뉴스, "황금돼지해 특수 끝, 출산율 다시 3년 만에 하락세", ~ (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)