공공언어의 전문성, 전문용어의 공공성
Plain Administrative Language - How to Reconcile Publicness and Expertise? -
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The problematic of public language in Korea -which, in fact, is a notion that appeared properly in a Korean institutional context- consists of four fundamental questions. First of all, the notion of public language is not sufficiently addressed in a theoretical point of view, in the sense that the various definitions made in many articles or in dictionaries are operational definitions based mainly on their speakers(the public sectors), and their interlocutors(the public). Second, the language movement widely known as the Plain English Campaign is misunderstood because the word plain is translated to “easy” in Korean. Third, the standardization of terminology dealt with either by the National Institute of the Korean Language and the Terminology Commissions located in each ministry, poses problems by confusing the specialized terms and administrative expressions or words -gibberish, rare and heavy words- which weigh down the text. Finally, by substituting sepcialized terms for easier 'vulgar' terms, we not only risk getting lost in the misunderstanding but also creating a third language that neither the public nor experts use. Public language has to be considered as a complex writing that includes two different language registers, that of experts and citizens who use everyday language. After investigating English devices and French legal measures which aim at the duty of clear and understandable administrative language, we are led to conclude that the terminology and administrative expressions must be treated separately, the first by providing the definition precise and accessible to the public, and the second by proposing simple and clear words or reformulations.
Abstract
The problematic of public language in Korea -which, in fact, is a notion that appeared properly in a Korean institutional context- consists of four fundamental questions. First of all, the notion of public language is not sufficiently addressed in a theoretical point of view, in the sense that the various definitions made in many articles or in dictionaries are operational definitions based mainly on their speakers(the public sectors), and their interlocutors(the public). Second, the language movement widely known as the Plain English Campaign is misunderstood because the word plain is translated to “easy” in Korean. Third, the standardization of terminology dealt with either by the National Institute of the Korean Language and the Terminology Commissions located in each ministry, poses problems by confusing the specialized terms and administrative expressions or words -gibberish, rare and heavy words- which weigh down the text. Finally, by substituting sepcialized terms for easier 'vulgar' terms, we not only risk getting lost in the misunderstanding but also creating a third language that neither the public nor experts use. Public language has to be considered as a complex writing that includes two different language registers, that of experts and citizens who use everyday language. After investigating English devices and French legal measures which aim at the duty of clear and understandable administrative language, we are led to conclude that the terminology and administrative expressions must be treated separately, the first by providing the definition precise and accessible to the public, and the second by proposing simple and clear words or reformulations.
참고문헌 (50)
- 전문용어 표준화 제도 정비를 위한 정책 연구, "강현화", 문화부, ~ (2010)
- 강현화, "전문 용어의 국어화", 새국어생활, 21(2), pp.85~98 (2011), 국립국어원
- 국립국어원, "한눈에 알아보는 공문서 바로 쓰기", ~ (2009)
- 국립국어원, "쉬운 공공언어 쓰기 길잡이", ~ (2014)
- 국립국어원, "개정 한눈에 알아보는 공공언어 바로 쓰기", ~ (2019)
- 국립국어원, "전문용어 표준화 안내서", ~ (2020)
- 김수업, "전문용어의 순화 방안", 새국어생활, 17(1), pp.89~101 (2007), 국립국어원
- 김하수, "국어 순화의 비판적 대안", 새국어생활, 21(2), pp.123~136 (2011), 국립국어원
- 김현권, "프랑스의 모국어 보호 정책과 법제", 새국어생활, 13(2), pp.103~129 (2003)
- 문상석, "다시 읽는 막스 베버", pp.325~371 (2015), 문예출판사
- 공공언어 요건 정립 및 진단 기준 개발 연구, "민현식", 국립국어원, ~ (2010)
- 방민희, "영미에서 시민의 권리를 위한 쉬운 영어·쉬운 언어 운동", ‘공공언어 개선의 사회철학 세우기’ 학술토론회 발표집, pp.39~72 (2020)
- 서혁, "공공문식성 신장을 위한 인터넷 민원 문서 실행 과정 분석", 국어교육연구, (33), pp.103~130 (2014), 국어교육연구소[DOI]
- 송기형, "현대 프랑스의 언어정책" (2015), 한국문화사
- 송기형, "프랑스의 언어정책과 불어 사용법", 한국프랑스학논집, 27, pp.391~411 (1999)
- 공공용어 관리 체계 구축을 위한 중장기 계획 수립, "이영현", 국립국어원, ~ (2020)
- 이현주, "전문용어 정책의 국제적 흐름과 한국의 정책 방향에 대한 탐색적 연구", 언어사실과 관점, 42, pp.65~98 (2017), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
- 이현주, "프랑스의 공공언어 정책: 시민성과 언어권을 향하여", 인문언어, 22(2), pp.305~338 (2020), 국제언어인문학회[DOI]
- 임의영, "관료제의 합리화 역설: M. Weber의 고전적 논의와 U. Beck의 위험사회론을 중심으로", 행정논총, 54(2), pp.149~180 (2016), 한국행정연구소
- 전성우, "막스 베버 사회학. 연구논문집" (2013), 나남
- 정희창, "국어 순화어의 공공성", 국어 정책 학술대회 발표집 : 국어 순화의 방향과 방법, pp.71~84 (2019), 국립국어원
- 조태린, "공공언어 문제에 대한 정책적 개입 방식", 한말연구, (27), pp.379~405 (2010), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 공공언어 지원 체계 개선 방안 연구, "조태린", 국립국어원, ~ (2014)
- 중앙 행정 기관의 전문 용어 개선 지원 및 순화어 정비 연구, "허재영", 국립국어원, ~ (2014)
- 홍종선, "국어사전학 개론" (2009), 제이앤씨
- 황용주, "한국의 언어 관리 정책 -공공언어 개선 정책 을 중심으로 -", 국어문학, 50(50), pp.23~45 (2011), 국어문학회[DOI]
- Authier, J., "La mise en scène de la communication dans des discours de vulgarisation scientifique", La Langue Française, 53, pp.34~ (1982)
- Candel, D., "Normes en terminologie officielle (France, 1996ᐨ2014)", Cahiers de Lexicologie, 110, pp.29~ (2017)
- Chansou, M., "L’aménagement lexical en France pendant la période contemporaine (1950ᐨ1994). Étude de sociolexicologie" (2003), HonoréChampion éditeur
- COSLA, "Lexique administratif, Ministère de la fonction publique et de la réforme d’État" (2002), les Dictionnaires Le Robert
- COSLA, "Guide pratique de la rédaction administrative", Ministère de la fonction publique et de la réforme d’État, ~ (2005)
- Crouzet-Daurat, P., "Terminology & Discourse" (2018), Peter Lang
- Crystal, D., "Investigating English style" (2017), Routledge
- DGLFLF, "Guide des bonnes pratiques à l’usage des experts de la Commission d’enrichissement de la langue française", Ministère de la Culture, ~ (2019)
- Fernbach, N., "La simplification du texte juridique: étude comparative", Français juridique et Science du droit. Colloque international du Centre international de la common law en français (CICLEF), pp.105~122 (1995)
- Fiala, P., "Langue et politique, passion française", Mots. Les Langages du Politique, 104, pp.107~117 (2014)
- Fougère, L., "L’administration et la langue française", La Revue Administrative, 34(24), pp.571~573 (1981)
- Gaudin, F., "Pour une socioterminologie. Des problèmes sémantiques aux pratiques institutionnelles" (1993), PUR
- Giddens, A., "The construction of society" (1984), Polity Press
- Gowers, E., "The complete plain words" (1954), Her Majestys Stationery Office
- Gowers, E., "Plain words : A guide to the use of English" (2015), Penguin
- Labarrère, C., "La dégradation de la langue française dans l'administration", La Revue Administrative, 42(250), pp.307~314 (1989), PUF
- Madinier, B., "Langage administratif et modernisation de l’État", La communication avec le citoyen: Efficace et accssible? Actes du collque de Liège 2009., pp.55~66 (2009), De Booeck[DOI]
- Marusenko, M. A., "La terminologie en URSS: Aperçu sur ses développements en Europe Central, SLOVO (vol. 8)", pp.81~80 (1986), Publications Langues O
- Mouron, P., "L’Europe des langues", pp.101~114 (2014), PUAM
- "투봉법"[URL]
- "프랑스어 진흥법"[URL]
- "프랑스어 대표부 누리집"[URL]
- "공식 전문용어 France terme 누리집"[URL]
- "Plain English Campaign 누리집"[URL]