국방품질경영체제(DQMS) 인증 의무화를 위한 단계적 적용 대상 선정기준 연구
Selection Criteria for Phased Implementation Targets of Mandatory Defense Quality-Management System (DQMS) Certification
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Defense Quality Management System (DQMS) in Korea, which is based on ISO 9001 and codified in KDS 0050-9000, currently operates voluntarily, thus creating potential discrepancies in the quality assurance and safety management of defense supplies. This study develops selection criteria to identify target firms for the phased mandatory DQMS certification. Two complementary approaches are proposed: (i) a taxonomy-based classification method utilizing existing frameworks (weapon system categories and Korean Standard Industrial Classification codes) to ensure administrative efficiency; and (ii) a comprehensive risk-assessment scorecard that evaluates firms across multiple dimensions, including hazard exposure levels, safety-management track records, and supply-chain criticality. The scorecard model allocates 200 points across four risk tiers, with different implementation timelines for each tier. A hybrid framework that integrates both approaches is introduced, where taxonomy is used for the initial scope definition and a scorecard for firm-specific risk assessment. Additionally, this study examines the legal and institutional requirements for a successful implementation. The findings of this study provide evidence-based selection criteria designed to prioritize mandatory certification in which defense safety, supply reliability, and policy feasibility converge optimally.
Abstract
The Defense Quality Management System (DQMS) in Korea, which is based on ISO 9001 and codified in KDS 0050-9000, currently operates voluntarily, thus creating potential discrepancies in the quality assurance and safety management of defense supplies. This study develops selection criteria to identify target firms for the phased mandatory DQMS certification. Two complementary approaches are proposed: (i) a taxonomy-based classification method utilizing existing frameworks (weapon system categories and Korean Standard Industrial Classification codes) to ensure administrative efficiency; and (ii) a comprehensive risk-assessment scorecard that evaluates firms across multiple dimensions, including hazard exposure levels, safety-management track records, and supply-chain criticality. The scorecard model allocates 200 points across four risk tiers, with different implementation timelines for each tier. A hybrid framework that integrates both approaches is introduced, where taxonomy is used for the initial scope definition and a scorecard for firm-specific risk assessment. Additionally, this study examines the legal and institutional requirements for a successful implementation. The findings of this study provide evidence-based selection criteria designed to prioritize mandatory certification in which defense safety, supply reliability, and policy feasibility converge optimally.