현장 적용 결과에 기반한 국방품질경영체제 정량적 평가 모델의 개선 방안
Improvement in Quantitative Evaluation Model of Defense Quality Management System Based on Field Application Results
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A Defense Quality Management System(DQMS) is introduced to improve the quality assurance capability of defense industries and effectively conduct the government’s quality assurance activities. However, to maintain the certification, many defense companies perform minimal activities, such as certification examinations and submission of corrective measures for nonconformity. In 2021, the Defense Agency for Technology and Quality developed a quantitative evaluation model for the DQMS to induce self-rescue efforts by companies and institutionalize them. In this study, practical methods for improving the quantitative evaluation model of a DQMS are proposed based on field application results. The developed quantitative evaluation model is applied to 20 DQMS certified defense companies and the results are analyzed. The proposed practical improvement methods include reducing the number of evaluation items, designing documentation forms for preparing an audit, and imposing strict qualifications to the auditors. The DQMS quantitative evaluation model is expected to be stably institutionalized, thereby improving the quality-management system of defense companies and the quality of their products.
Abstract
A Defense Quality Management System(DQMS) is introduced to improve the quality assurance capability of defense industries and effectively conduct the government’s quality assurance activities. However, to maintain the certification, many defense companies perform minimal activities, such as certification examinations and submission of corrective measures for nonconformity. In 2021, the Defense Agency for Technology and Quality developed a quantitative evaluation model for the DQMS to induce self-rescue efforts by companies and institutionalize them. In this study, practical methods for improving the quantitative evaluation model of a DQMS are proposed based on field application results. The developed quantitative evaluation model is applied to 20 DQMS certified defense companies and the results are analyzed. The proposed practical improvement methods include reducing the number of evaluation items, designing documentation forms for preparing an audit, and imposing strict qualifications to the auditors. The DQMS quantitative evaluation model is expected to be stably institutionalized, thereby improving the quality-management system of defense companies and the quality of their products.
참고문헌 (10)
- Park, J. M., "An Empirical Study on the Importance of Standard for DQMS Using Analytic Hierarchy Process", Journal of Applied Reliability, 20(3), pp.271~276 (2020)
- Kim, Y. H., "A Study on the Development and Institutionalization Plan of a Quantitative Evaluation Model of Defense Quality Management System", J Korean Soc Qual Manag, 50(2), pp.183~197 (2022)
- Moon, J. Y., "Developing Instruments for Measuring the Effectiveness of the Korean National Quality Award", J Korean Soc Qual Manag, 34(2), pp.22~43 (2006)
- Kim S. D., "Model Development and Analysis for Assessment of the National Defense Industry Quality Management", J Korean Soc Qual Manag, 44(2), pp.277~296 (2016)
- Kim, T. K., "A Comparison of Quality Awards Program in the Major G-20 for Developing a Korean National Quality Award Model", J Korean Soc Qual Manag, 39(2), pp.337~346 (2011)
- Park, N. G., "A Study on the Quality Management of Malcolm Baldrige and Evaluation Model", Innovation Enterprise Research, 4(2), pp.119~137 (2019)
- Park, Y. T., "Criteria for Quality Award and Measurement of Management Quality", J Korean Soc Qual Manag, 26(2), pp.82~92 (1998)
- Cho, Y. S., "The study on evaluation model development for the ISO certification bodies", Korean J. of Bus. Admin, 21(3), pp.985~1009 (2008)
- Wilson D. D., "An Empirical Investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Causal Model", Journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, 31(2), pp.361~383 (2000)
- Ghosh, S., "A structural model analysis of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award framework", Internationl Journal of Management & Decision Making, 4(4), pp.289~311 (2004)