군수품 정부품질보증 위험성 평가제도 개선을 위한 제언
Proposal for Government Quality Assurance Risk Assessment System for Military Supplies
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Nowadays, the risk assessment system is widely used in many industrial and public areas to reduce the possible risks. The system is used to determine the priorities of the government quality assurance works in Defense Agency for Technology and Quality. However, as the risk assessment system is used for other purposes, there are some items that need improvement, and in this study, we propose improvement plans by benchmarking the risk assessment systems of other institutions. Methods: In this paper, first, the procedures of risk assessment system used in many industrial sites were reviewed, and how each institution specialized and applied the system. Afterwards, by benchmarking various risk assessment systems, an improvement plan on how to operate the risk assessment system in the case of government quality assurance for centrally procured military supplies was presented, and practical application cases were presented to prove the usefulness of the improvement plan. Results: The proposed risk assessment system differs from the existing system in five major aspects. First, inputs, outputs, and key performance indicators were specified from the systematic point of view. Second, risk analysis was analyzed in four dimensions: probability of occurrence, impact, detection difficulty. Third, risk mitigation measures were classified, control, transfer, and sharing. Fourth, the risk mitigation measures were realized through document verification, product verification, process verification, and quality system evaluation. Finally, risk mitigation measures were implemented and the effectiveness of the risk mitigation measures was evaluated through effectiveness evaluation. Conclusions: In order for the risk assessment procedure proposed in this study to be applied to actual work, it is necessary to obtain the consent of the person involved in the work due to the increased time for risk identification and preparation of the government quality assurance log, and a change in the information system that performs the actual work is required. Therefore, the authors of this study plan to actively perform internal seminar presentations and work improvement suggestions to apply these research outputs to actual work.
Abstract
Purpose: Nowadays, the risk assessment system is widely used in many industrial and public areas to reduce the possible risks. The system is used to determine the priorities of the government quality assurance works in Defense Agency for Technology and Quality. However, as the risk assessment system is used for other purposes, there are some items that need improvement, and in this study, we propose improvement plans by benchmarking the risk assessment systems of other institutions. Methods: In this paper, first, the procedures of risk assessment system used in many industrial sites were reviewed, and how each institution specialized and applied the system. Afterwards, by benchmarking various risk assessment systems, an improvement plan on how to operate the risk assessment system in the case of government quality assurance for centrally procured military supplies was presented, and practical application cases were presented to prove the usefulness of the improvement plan. Results: The proposed risk assessment system differs from the existing system in five major aspects. First, inputs, outputs, and key performance indicators were specified from the systematic point of view. Second, risk analysis was analyzed in four dimensions: probability of occurrence, impact, detection difficulty. Third, risk mitigation measures were classified, control, transfer, and sharing. Fourth, the risk mitigation measures were realized through document verification, product verification, process verification, and quality system evaluation. Finally, risk mitigation measures were implemented and the effectiveness of the risk mitigation measures was evaluated through effectiveness evaluation. Conclusions: In order for the risk assessment procedure proposed in this study to be applied to actual work, it is necessary to obtain the consent of the person involved in the work due to the increased time for risk identification and preparation of the government quality assurance log, and a change in the information system that performs the actual work is required. Therefore, the authors of this study plan to actively perform internal seminar presentations and work improvement suggestions to apply these research outputs to actual work.
참고문헌 (38)
- 안남수, "위험관리기반의 군수품 품질보증업무 변화를 위한 제언", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 16(9), pp.5914~5923 (2015), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Bae, M., "A Study on Quality 4. 0 Level Investigation Methods for Military Goods Producers", Fall Conference in Korea Quality Management Society, pp.135~ (2022)
- Baek, J. B, "Policy Improvement Task for Expansion of Risk Assessment System", The Safety Technology, (177), pp.6~10 (2012)
- Central Regional Forest Service(CRFS), "Safety and Health Management Regulations. Order 127", ~ (2022)
- Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, "Statistical Yearbook", ~ (2022)
- Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ)., "Basic Regulations on Military Supplies Quality Management", ~ (2022)
- Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA), "Risk Assessment. DCMA-INST-326", ~ (2014)
- Department of Defense(DoD)., "Risk, Issue, and Opportunity Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs", ~ (2017)
- Eastern Regional Forest Service(ERFS), "Safety and Health Management Regulations. Order 170", ~ (2022)
- Food and Drug Safety Evaluation Institute(FDSE), "Safety and Health Management Regulations. Institute Rules 114", ~ (2021)
- Jung, S, "What is the Work Site Risk Assessment Regulation which takes Effect from 2013?", The Magazine of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 61(8), pp.84~90 (2013)
- 강인면, "군수품 품질경영 효율화를 위한 사업장 단위 품질 보증 개선 방안 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 18(12), pp.613~619 (2017), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Kim, J. H, "Current State of Hazard and Risk Assessment System and Operation in the UK", Occupational Health Monthly, pp.56~64 (2006)
- 김상호, "프랑스의 산업안전보건제도에 관한 연구 - 위험성 평가 제도를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 23(3), pp.27~51 (2015), 법학연구소
- 김수태, "연구실 위험성평가방법 개선에 관한 연구", 한국재난정보학회 논문집, 18(3), pp.444~456 (2022), 한국재난정보학회
- 김승원, "근로자 노출평가제도 내 위험성평가 방법론의 적용", 한국산업보건학회지, 25(4), pp.482~492 (2015), 한국산업보건학회[DOI]
- 김영현, "국방품질경영체제(DQMS) 정량평가모델 개발 및 제도화 방안 연구", 품질경영학회지, 50(2), pp.183~197 (2022), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Lee, H., "A Study on Paradigm Shift in Defense Quality Management according to the 4th industrial revolution", Fall Conference in Korea Quality Management Society, pp.134~ (2022)
- Lee, N., "A Method to improve the Risk Assessment in the Defense Quality Assurance using AHP", Journal of the Korean Society for Defense Management Analysis, 33(1), pp.31~42 (2007)
- Ministry of Employment of Labor(MoEL), "Guidance on workplace risk assessment. Notice 53", ~ (2020)
- Ministry of Employment of Labor(MoEL), "Occupational Safety and Health Act. Law 18426", ~ (1842)
- Ministry of Employment of Labor(MoEL), "Regulations on Hazard and Risk Assessment of Chemical Substances. Rules 203", ~ (2023)
- Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy(MoTIE), "Industrial Technology Innovation Project Energy Technology Empirical Research Evaluation Management Guidelines. Rules 121", ~ (2022)
- National Folk Museum(NFM), "Risk Assessment Implementation Regulations. Rules 243", ~ (2022)
- National Forest Varieties Management Center(NFVM), "Safety and Health Management Regulations. Instruction 77", ~ (2022)
- National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science(NIHH), "Safety and Health Management Regulations. Instruction 199", ~ (2022)
- Osong Life Science Complex Support Center(OLSCSC), "Occupational Safety and Health Management Regulations. Established Rule 32", ~ (2022)
- 백충현, "건설업 위험성 평가 실효성을 위한 최적화 연구", 대한안전경영과학회지, 17(3), pp.15~22 (2015), 대한안전경영과학회[DOI]
- Park, D. Y, "Background of Introduction of Risk Assessment System-Business Management Perspective", Occupational Health Monthly, pp.38~44 (2006)
- Park, D. Y, "Background of Introduction of Risk Assessment System-Labor Management Participation Perspective", Occupational Health Monthly, pp.34~40 (2006)
- 박민서, "디지털 전환 시대의 새로운 품질 차원 적용 사례연구", 품질경영학회지, 49(4), pp.609~622 (2021), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 류요엘, "배송로봇의 보도 주행 허용을 위한 위험성 평가 모델을 활용한 안전 요구사항 개발에 관한 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 22(9), pp.10~18 (2021), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- 서호진, "품질 4.0: 개념, 요소, 수준 평가와 전개 방향", 품질경영학회지, 49(4), pp.447~466 (2021), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 서상원, "해외 선진국 규정 분석을 통한 국내 정부품질보증 효율성 향상 방안", 품질경영학회지, 45(3), pp.335~348 (2017), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 신인재, "독일, 영국과 한국, 일본 등 아시아 국가 간의 위험성평가 제도 비교연구", 한국안전학회지, 28(1), pp.151~157 (2013), 한국안전학회
- 송호준, "산업재해 감소율 제고를 위한 위험성평가 제도의 개선 방안 도출 : 중소규모 사업장을 중심으로", 대한안전경영과학회지, 24(2), pp.25~32 (2022), 대한안전경영과학회
- Southern Regional Forest Service(SRFS), "Safety and Health Management Regulations. Order 252", ~ (2022)
- Yoo, H., "Introduction of Munitions Quality Certification System and Research on Ways to expand Autonomy for Companies", Fall Conference in Korea Quality Management Society, pp.103~ (2018)