모델 스캐너와 구내 스캐너로 획득한 디지털 모형에서 시행한 공간 분석의 타당도, 신뢰도, 재현성 평가
Validity, Reliability and Reproducibility of Space Analysis using Digital Model taken via Model Scanner and Intraoral Scanner: An In vivo Study
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구는 모델 스캐너로 석고 모형을 스캔한 디지털 모형(Model scanned digital model, MSD)과 구내 스캐너로 구강을 스캔한 디지털 모형(Intraoral scanned digital model, ISD)에서 계측한 치아 근원심 폭경(Tooth width, TW)과 치열궁 길이(Arch length, AL)의 신뢰도와 재현성, 치열궁 길이 편차(Arch length discrepancy, ALD) 분석의 타당도를 평가하였다. 만 12 - 18세의 남, 여 30명에게 석고 모형, MSD, ISD를 획득하고, 2번 계측한 TW, AL의 신뢰도는 Pearson 상관 분석, 4명의 재현성은 군간 상관 분석 그리고 TW, AL 및 ALD의 타당도는 대응표본 t검정으로 평가하였다. 결과적으로 모든 군에서 계측한 TW, AL는 높은 신뢰도와 재현성을 보였고 MSD군의 ALD분석은 적절한 타당도를 보였다. ISD 군의TW는 가장 높은 타당도를 보인 반면에, AL와 ALD분석은 유의미하게 짧게 측정되어 낮은 타당도를 보였으므로 임상가는 디지털 모델을 이용하여 공간 분석 시행 시 이를 고려해야 할 것이다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate validity, reliability and reproducibility of tooth width (TW), arch length (AL) and arch length discrepancy (ALD) measured on a digital model taken via 3-dimensional model scanner and intraoral scanner compared to a plaster model. A total of 30 patients aged 12 to 18 were eligible for the study. 3 types of models were acquired from each patient: a conventional plaster model (P), a model scanned digital model (MSD) taken via Freedom UHD® and an intraoral scanned digital model (ISD) taken via CS3600® in-vivo. The reliability of TW and AL in each group was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, while the reproducibility was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient. The validity of space analysis was assessed by paired t-test. As a result, all measurements of P, MSD and ISD groups showed favorable reliability and reproducibility. Most of measurements for space analysis in MSD group and TW in ISD group also presented high validity. AL and ALD presented statistically significant difference between P and ISD group. The validity of measurements of space analysis in ISD group was short in doubt to valid, but clinically acceptable. Both MSD and ISD are clinically acceptable to use for space analysis but clinician should be aware that errors can be found using a digital model.
참고문헌 (30)
- Richter AE, "Incidence of caries lesions among patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.657~664 (2011)
- Crosby DR, "The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 95, pp.457~461 (1989)
- Schirmer UR, "Manual and computer-aided space analysis : a comparative study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 112, pp.676~680 (1997)
- Motohashi N, "A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery", Eur J Orthod, 21, pp.263~274 (1999)
- Zilberman O, "Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.301~306 (2003)
- Fleming PS, "Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models : a systematic review", Orthod Craniofac Res, 14, pp.1~16 (2011)
- Rossini G, "Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes : A systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.161~170 (2016)
- Tomassetti JJ, "A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method", Angle Orthod, 71, pp.351~357 (2001)
- Santoro M, "Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.101~105 (2003)
- Stevens DR, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models : comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.794~803 (2006)
- Mullen SR, "Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.346~352 (2007)
- Goracci C, "Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions : a systematic review of the clinical evidence", Eur J Orthod, 38, pp.422~428 (2016)
- Grunheid T, "Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner : an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, pp.673~682 (2014)
- Jeong ID, "Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner : An in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.755~759 (2016)
- Camardella LT, "Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner", J Orofac Orthop, 78, pp.211~220 (2017)
- Malik J, "Comparison of accuracy between a conventional and two digital intraoral impression techniques", Int J Prosthodont, 31, pp.107~113 (2018)
- Sfondrini MF, "Computerized casts for orthodontic purpose using powder-free intraoral scanners : accuracy, execution time, and patient feedback", Biomed Res Int, 2018, pp.4103232~ (2018)
- Tomita Y, "Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression", plastermodel methods and intraoral scanning, 2018, pp.37, 628~633
- Kihara H, "Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry : A literature review", J Prosthodont Res, 64, pp.109~113 (2020)
- Ender A, "In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.313~320 (2016)
- Zhang F, "Validity of intraoral scans compared with plaster models : An in-vivo comparison of dental measurements and 3D surface analysis", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0157713~ (2016)
- Nedelcu R, "Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions : A novel in vivo analysis method", J Dent, 69, pp.110~118 (2018)
- Lee S, "Reproducibility of an intraoral scanner : A comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo scans", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 154, pp.305~310 (2018)
- Jiménez-Gayosso SI, "Difference between manual and digital measurements of dental arches of orthodontic patients", Medicine, 97, pp.e10887~ (2018)
- Mangano A, "Conventional vs digital impressions : acceptability, treatment comfort and stress among young orthodontic patients", Open Dent J, 12, pp.118~124 (2018)
- Burhardt L, "Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques : A comparative study in young patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150, pp.261~267 (2016)
- Ting Shu S, "Intraoral digital impression technique : A review", J Prosthodont, 24, pp.313~321 (2015)
- Kim EJ, "Reproducibility and accuracy of tooth size measurements obtained by the use of computer", Korean J Orthod, pp.563~573 (1998)
- Flugge TV, "Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.471~478 (2013)
- Gul Amuk N, "Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning", Int Orthod, 17, pp.151~158 (2019)