Design and characterization of polymeric scaffolds reinforced with ZrO2-doped BG-85S bioabsorbable ceramics for training bone restoration
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates the effects of varying ZrO₂ content on the mechanical properties of BG-85S bioactive glass, aimingto enhance its potential as a scaffold material in tissue engineering applications. Compressive strength and porosity wereanalyzed, revealing a significant enhancement in compressive strength and a reduction in porosity with increasing ZrO₂content. Specifically, compressive strength increased from approximately 210 MPa at 0 wt% ZrO₂ to about 300 MPa at 6 wt%ZrO₂, while porosity decreased from around 50 vol% to 30 vol% over the same range. These improvements are attributedto the reinforcing effect of ZrO₂, which enhances structural integrity and resistance to deformation, and promotes a densermaterial structure through liquid phase sintering and vitrification. Additionally, increases in hardness and Young's moduluswith higher ZrO₂ content were observed, further supporting the potential of ZrO₂-doped bioactive glasses for biomedicalapplications requiring enhanced mechanical performance. The observed improvements in mechanical properties, includingincreased compressive strength, reduced porosity, and enhanced hardness and Young's modulus, highlight the suitability ofZrO₂-doped bioactive glass for load-bearing applications in tissue engineering. These findings underscore the importance ofoptimizing ZrO₂ content to maximize mechanical performance while maintaining bioactivity and biocompatibility. Futureresearch should focus on further optimizing ZrO₂ content for specific applications, assessing the long-term stability andbioactivity of these materials in physiological conditions, and exploring the potential of ZrO₂-doped bioactive glasses in variousbiomedical applications.
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of varying ZrO₂ content on the mechanical properties of BG-85S bioactive glass, aimingto enhance its potential as a scaffold material in tissue engineering applications. Compressive strength and porosity wereanalyzed, revealing a significant enhancement in compressive strength and a reduction in porosity with increasing ZrO₂content. Specifically, compressive strength increased from approximately 210 MPa at 0 wt% ZrO₂ to about 300 MPa at 6 wt%ZrO₂, while porosity decreased from around 50 vol% to 30 vol% over the same range. These improvements are attributedto the reinforcing effect of ZrO₂, which enhances structural integrity and resistance to deformation, and promotes a densermaterial structure through liquid phase sintering and vitrification. Additionally, increases in hardness and Young's moduluswith higher ZrO₂ content were observed, further supporting the potential of ZrO₂-doped bioactive glasses for biomedicalapplications requiring enhanced mechanical performance. The observed improvements in mechanical properties, includingincreased compressive strength, reduced porosity, and enhanced hardness and Young's modulus, highlight the suitability ofZrO₂-doped bioactive glass for load-bearing applications in tissue engineering. These findings underscore the importance ofoptimizing ZrO₂ content to maximize mechanical performance while maintaining bioactivity and biocompatibility. Futureresearch should focus on further optimizing ZrO₂ content for specific applications, assessing the long-term stability andbioactivity of these materials in physiological conditions, and exploring the potential of ZrO₂-doped bioactive glasses in variousbiomedical applications.
참고문헌 (17)
- J. Lian, , Scripta Mater, 56(12), pp.1095~1098 (2007)
- M. A. Meyers, , Prog. Mater. Sci, 51, pp.427~556 (2006)
- M. Cain, , Appl. Organomet. Chem, 15(5), pp.321~330 (2001)
- O. J. Kamigaito, , Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall, 38, pp.315~321 (1991)
- W. A. Soer, , Acta Mater, 53(17), pp.4665~4676 (2005)
- U. Anselmi-Tamburini, , J. Mater. Res, 19(11), pp.3255~3262 (2004)
- A. A. Elmustafa, , J. Mechanics Phys. Solids, 51(2), pp.357~381 (2003)
- J. Spino, , J. Nucl. Mater, 322(2-3), pp.204~216 (2003)
- D. Caceres, , Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 191(1-4), pp.154~157 (2002)
- M. Alrwashdeh, , Energies, 15(21), pp.8008~ (2022)
- A. A. Elmustafa, , Scripta Mater, 43(10), pp.951~955 (2000)
- D. Mondal, , J. Mater. Sci, 48, pp.1863~1872 (2013)
- P. Sepulveda, , J. Biomed. Mater. Res, 58(6), pp.734~740 (2001)
- M. R. Ramsheh, , Iran Biomed. J, 25(3), pp.180~192 (2021)
- T. Oliveira, , Colloid Polym. Sci, 292, pp.863~871 (2014)
- M. Alrwashdeh, , Nucl. Sci. Eng, 194(2), pp.163~167 (2020)
- V. C. P. F. Aguiar, , J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed, 35(10), pp.1493~1510 (2024)
