탈근대적 생명정치 개념의 기초적 고찰－푸코와 로즈의 생명정치 개념을 중심으로－
The Postmodern Concept of Biopolitics－Foucault and Rose on Biopolitics－
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The total medicalisation of life implies both the politicizing and depoliticizing of life. The contemporary bioscience modifies the form and the meaning of life. It makes the life of individuals more somatic, risky, and variable. Analysing the power and truth discourses Foucault has argued the modern biopower controlls the modes of subjectifications of individuals in use of the double bind of individualising and totalising procedures, through that the modern men are reshaped as disciplined individual bodies and regulated population. The concern of the modern biopower is absolutely ‘making live’. For Rose who is indebted to Foucault, the postmodern biopolitics is related to the advent of the biovalue and the molecularization and capitalization of vitality. Rose suggests that the individuals are on the one hand subjected to the pastoral biopower and －capital. On the other they can take the new identities in terms of ‘somatic individuality’ and ‘biological citizenship’. The postmodern ‘politics of life itself’ of Rose enables the formation of new types of subjectification and identity, through that it can be defined as more positive and productive than Foucault’s. Rose’attempt to the positive reframing of the postmodern biopolitics is effective and meaningful, but his conception is not complete enough to include the basic problem of ‘power’ and ‘death’.
Abstract
The total medicalisation of life implies both the politicizing and depoliticizing of life. The contemporary bioscience modifies the form and the meaning of life. It makes the life of individuals more somatic, risky, and variable. Analysing the power and truth discourses Foucault has argued the modern biopower controlls the modes of subjectifications of individuals in use of the double bind of individualising and totalising procedures, through that the modern men are reshaped as disciplined individual bodies and regulated population. The concern of the modern biopower is absolutely ‘making live’. For Rose who is indebted to Foucault, the postmodern biopolitics is related to the advent of the biovalue and the molecularization and capitalization of vitality. Rose suggests that the individuals are on the one hand subjected to the pastoral biopower and －capital. On the other they can take the new identities in terms of ‘somatic individuality’ and ‘biological citizenship’. The postmodern ‘politics of life itself’ of Rose enables the formation of new types of subjectification and identity, through that it can be defined as more positive and productive than Foucault’s. Rose’attempt to the positive reframing of the postmodern biopolitics is effective and meaningful, but his conception is not complete enough to include the basic problem of ‘power’ and ‘death’.
참고문헌 (33)
- 조르조 아감벤, "벌거벗은 생명" (2008), 새물결
- 미셸 푸코, "성의 역사 1.앎의 의지" (1993), 나남
- 미셸 푸코, "성의 역사 2.쾌락의 활용" (1990), 나남
- 미셸 푸코, "성의 역사 3.자기에의 배려" (1990), 나남
- 미셸 푸코, "사회를 보호해야 한다. in: 콜레주 드 프랑스에서의 강의" (1998), 동문선
- 미셸 푸코, "주체의 해석학. 1981～1982, 콜레주 드 프랑스에서의 강의" (2007), 동문선
- 미셸 푸코, "감시와 처벌. 감옥의 역사" (2005), 나남
- 김부용, "미셀 푸코 사회인식론의 정립 가능성을 위한 시론", 철학사상, (31), pp.337~373 (2009), 철학사상연구소
- 김성우, "푸코의 역사－비판 존재론으로서 의학적 시선의 고고학", 의철학연구, 7, pp.43~61 (2009), 한국의철학회
- 양운덕, "미시권력들의 작용과 생명 정치 : 푸꼬의 권력분석틀과 아감벤의 근대 생명정치학 비판", 철학연구, (36), pp.169~213 (2008), 철학연구소
- J. P. Bishop, "Biopolitics, Terri Schiavo, and the Sovereign Subject of Death", Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33, pp.538~557 (2009)
- J. P. Bishop, "Revisiting Foucault", Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 34, pp.323~327 (2009)
- J. P. Bishop, "Foucauldian Diagnostics: Space, Time, and the Metaphysics of Medicine", Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 34, pp.328~349 (2009)
- L. Cadman, "Life and Death Decision in our Posthuman(ist) Times", Antipode, 41(1), pp.133~158 (2009)
- M. Foucault, "Die Geburt der Biopolitik. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität 2, Frankfurt", ~ (2009)
- P. Gehring, "Was ist Biomacht?, Frankfurt", ~ (2006)
- P. Gehring, "Foucault－Die Philosophie im Archiv, Frankfurt", ~ (2004)
- S. Graefe, "Autonomie am Lebensende?, Frankfurt", ~ (2007)
- M. Lazzarato, "From Biopower to Biopolitics", The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 13 (2002)
- T. Lemke, "The Birth of Bio－Politics’－Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo－Liberal Governmentality", Economy & Society, 30(2) (2001)
- T. Lemke, "Gouvernementalität der Gegenwart, Frankfurt", ~ (2000)
- A. Lösch, "Genomprojekt und Moderne, Frankfurt", ~ (2001)
- E. Myers, "Resisting Foucauldian Ethics: Associative Politics and the Limits of the Care of the Self", Contemporary Political Theory, 7, pp.125~146 (2008)
- H. Raab, "Foucault und der feministische Poststrukturalismus, Dortmund", ~ (1998)
- J. Rifkin, "Das biotechnische Zeitalter, Frankfurt", ~ (2007)
- N. Rose, "The Politics of Life Itself", Theory, Culture & Society, 18(6), pp.1~30 (2001)
- N. Rose, "The Politics of Life Itself, Princeton", ~ (2006)
- N. Rose, "Biopower Today", BioSocieties, 1, pp.195~217 (2006)
- N. Rose, "Molecular Biopolitics, Somatic Ethics and the Spirit of Biocapital", Social Theory & Health, 5, pp.3~29 (2007)
- N. Rose, "Beyond medicalisation", Lancet, 369, pp.700~702 (2007)
- N. Rose, "Race, Risk and Medicine in the Age of ‘Your Own Personal Genome’", BioSocieties, 3, pp.423~439 (2008)
- N. Rose, "The value of life: somatic ethics & the spirit of biocapital", Daedalus, 137(1), pp.36~48 (2008)
- N. Rose, "Governmentality", Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, pp.83~104 (2006)